Search (6179 results, page 4 of 309)

  1. #220 0.06
    0.060945332 = product of:
      0.121890664 = sum of:
        0.121890664 = product of:
          0.24378133 = sum of:
            0.24378133 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24378133 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  2. #1387 0.06
    0.060945332 = product of:
      0.121890664 = sum of:
        0.121890664 = product of:
          0.24378133 = sum of:
            0.24378133 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24378133 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  3. #2103 0.06
    0.060945332 = product of:
      0.121890664 = sum of:
        0.121890664 = product of:
          0.24378133 = sum of:
            0.24378133 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24378133 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  4. Altingovde, I. Sengor => Sengor Altingovde, I.: 0.06
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = product of:
          0.24240677 = sum of:
            0.24240677 = weight(_text_:i in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24240677 = score(doc=135,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.4143987 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  5. Almaguer, I. Barrios- -> Barrios-Almaguer, I.: 0.06
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = product of:
          0.24240677 = sum of:
            0.24240677 = weight(_text_:i in 951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24240677 = score(doc=951,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.4143987 = fieldWeight in 951, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=951)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Torres Ramírez, I. de => Ramírez, I. de Torres: 0.06
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = product of:
          0.24240677 = sum of:
            0.24240677 = weight(_text_:i in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24240677 = score(doc=3282,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.4143987 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Evangelista, I. Victorino => Victorino Evangelista, I.: 0.06
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = product of:
          0.24240677 = sum of:
            0.24240677 = weight(_text_:i in 4702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24240677 = score(doc=4702,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.4143987 = fieldWeight in 4702, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4702)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Evangelista, I. Victorino => Victorino Evangelista, I.: 0.06
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = product of:
          0.24240677 = sum of:
            0.24240677 = weight(_text_:i in 4734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24240677 = score(doc=4734,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.4143987 = fieldWeight in 4734, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Leiva, I. Gil- => Gil-Leiva, I.: 0.06
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = product of:
          0.24240677 = sum of:
            0.24240677 = weight(_text_:i in 4735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24240677 = score(doc=4735,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.4143987 = fieldWeight in 4735, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Leiva, I. Gil- => Gil-Leiva, I.: 0.06
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = product of:
          0.24240677 = sum of:
            0.24240677 = weight(_text_:i in 4912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24240677 = score(doc=4912,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.4143987 = fieldWeight in 4912, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=4912)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Gomez, I. Porto- => Porto-Gomez, I.: 0.06
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = product of:
          0.24240677 = sum of:
            0.24240677 = weight(_text_:i in 5372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24240677 = score(doc=5372,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.4143987 = fieldWeight in 5372, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=5372)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Mavriqi, I. Hasani- => Hasani-Mavriqi, I.: 0.06
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = product of:
          0.24240677 = sum of:
            0.24240677 = weight(_text_:i in 389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24240677 = score(doc=389,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.4143987 = fieldWeight in 389, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=389)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Leiva, I. Gil- => Gil-Leiva, I.: 0.06
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = product of:
          0.24240677 = sum of:
            0.24240677 = weight(_text_:i in 738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24240677 = score(doc=738,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.4143987 = fieldWeight in 738, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=738)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Sousa, I. Valle => Valle Sousa, I.: 0.06
    0.060601693 = product of:
      0.121203385 = sum of:
        0.121203385 = product of:
          0.24240677 = sum of:
            0.24240677 = weight(_text_:i in 757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24240677 = score(doc=757,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.4143987 = fieldWeight in 757, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.06
    0.060497127 = sum of:
      0.04510611 = product of:
        0.18042444 = sum of:
          0.18042444 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18042444 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01539102 = product of:
        0.03078204 = sum of:
          0.03078204 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03078204 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  16. Molholt, P.: Qualities of classification schemes for the Information Superhighway (1995) 0.06
    0.059126526 = product of:
      0.11825305 = sum of:
        0.11825305 = sum of:
          0.08747101 = weight(_text_:i in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08747101 = score(doc=5562,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.51037717 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
          0.03078204 = weight(_text_:22 in 5562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03078204 = score(doc=5562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5562)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    For my segment of this program I'd like to focus on some basic qualities of classification schemes. These qualities are critical to our ability to truly organize knowledge for access. As I see it, there are at least five qualities of note. The first one of these properties that I want to talk about is "authoritative." By this I mean standardized, but I mean more than standardized with a built in consensus-building process. A classification scheme constructed by a collaborative, consensus-building process carries the approval, and the authority, of the discipline groups that contribute to it and that it affects... The next property of classification systems is "expandable," living, responsive, with a clear locus of responsibility for its continuous upkeep. The worst thing you can do with a thesaurus, or a classification scheme, is to finish it. You can't ever finish it because it reflects ongoing intellectual activity... The third property is "intuitive." That is, the system has to be approachable, it has to be transparent, or at least capable of being transparent. It has to have an underlying logic that supports the classification scheme but doesn't dominate it... The fourth property is "organized and logical." I advocate very strongly, and agree with Lois Chan, that classification must be based on a rule-based structure, on somebody's world-view of the syndetic structure... The fifth property is "universal" by which I mean the classification scheme needs be useable by any specific system or application, and be available as a language for multiple purposes.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 21(1995) no.2, S.19-22
  17. #14007 0.06
    0.05713582 = product of:
      0.11427164 = sum of:
        0.11427164 = product of:
          0.22854328 = sum of:
            0.22854328 = weight(_text_:i in 4937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22854328 = score(doc=4937,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045439374 = queryNorm
                1.3335078 = fieldWeight in 4937, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.25 = fieldNorm(doc=4937)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Location
    Italien -> I
  18. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.06
    0.05628545 = sum of:
      0.036084887 = product of:
        0.14433955 = sum of:
          0.14433955 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14433955 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.38523552 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.020200564 = product of:
        0.040401127 = sum of:
          0.040401127 = weight(_text_:i in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040401127 = score(doc=7394,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.2357331 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  19. Tell, B.: On MARC and natural text searching : a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters (2000) 0.06
    0.055580027 = product of:
      0.111160055 = sum of:
        0.111160055 = sum of:
          0.07422161 = weight(_text_:i in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07422161 = score(doc=1183,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.43306938 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 1183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=1183,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1183, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The following discussion is in appreciation of the invaluable inspirations Pauline Cochrane, by her acumen and perspicacity, has implanted into my thinking regarding various applications of library and information science, especially those involving machine-readable records and subject categorization. It is indeed an honor for me at my age to be offered to contribute to Pauline's Festschrift when instead I should be concerned about my forthcoming obituary. In the following, I must give some Background to what formed my thinking before my involvement in the field and thus before I encountered Pauline.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  20. Salvesen, G.: Is the library able to find the answer? (2005) 0.06
    0.055580027 = product of:
      0.111160055 = sum of:
        0.111160055 = sum of:
          0.07422161 = weight(_text_:i in 3009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07422161 = score(doc=3009,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17138503 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.43306938 = fieldWeight in 3009, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3009)
          0.036938448 = weight(_text_:22 in 3009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036938448 = score(doc=3009,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15912095 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045439374 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3009, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3009)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To answer this question I need a theoretical discussion of the aspects that have implication on the quality of the reference service, and an empirical study of the service. By combining theories from the field of reference service, service, goods quality and service quality, I propose six factors related to the total quality of the reference service: The library, the servicescape, the librarian, the user and the answer. From these aspects I have in this paper chosen to focus on the librarian's ability to communicate with the user. The empirical study consists of an analysis of 20 dialogs conversations between user and librarian. The analysis has its theoretical and conceptual roots in Conversation Analysis or CA.
    Date
    22. 7.2009 10:54:45

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications