Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Garfield, E."
  1. Garfield, E.; Sager, N.: Mechanical indexing, structural linguistics and information retrieval (1993) 0.01
    0.0067306077 = product of:
      0.02692243 = sum of:
        0.02692243 = weight(_text_:information in 5900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02692243 = score(doc=5900,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5900, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5900)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 19(1993) no.2, S.164-165
  2. Garfield, E.: ¬The Permuterm Subject Index : an autobiographic review (1976) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 3299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=3299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3299)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.88-291
  3. Garfield, E.; Sher, I.H.: KeyWords Plus: algorithmic derivative indexing (1993) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 44(1993) no.5, S.298-299
  4. Garfield, E.: ¬A retrospective and prospective view of information retrieval and artificial intelligence in the 21st century (2001) 0.00
    0.004759258 = product of:
      0.019037032 = sum of:
        0.019037032 = weight(_text_:information in 5194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019037032 = score(doc=5194,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5194, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5194)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information tends to define community. Garfield reminisces about the reprint-sharing culture of science in the 1950s, and anticipates the digital full-text documents of the future.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Still the Frontier: Information Science at the Millenium
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.1, S.18-21
  5. Garfield, E.: How will new technology change the characteristics of libraries and their users? (1978) 0.00
    0.0035694437 = product of:
      0.014277775 = sum of:
        0.014277775 = weight(_text_:information in 901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014277775 = score(doc=901,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 901, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=901)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge and development. Reshaping library and information services for the world of tommorrow. Festschrift for Björn Tell. Ed. by S. Schwarz u. U. Willers
  6. Garfield, E.: ¬The relationship between mechanical indexing, structural linguistics and information retrieval (1992) 0.00
    0.0033653039 = product of:
      0.013461215 = sum of:
        0.013461215 = weight(_text_:information in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013461215 = score(doc=3632,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 18(1992) no.5, S.343-354
  7. Garfield, E.: Essays of an information scientist (1977-) 0.00
    0.0029745363 = product of:
      0.011898145 = sum of:
        0.011898145 = weight(_text_:information in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011898145 = score(doc=2015,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Garfield, E.: Chemico-linguistics : computer translation of chemical nomenclature (1961) 0.00
    0.0029745363 = product of:
      0.011898145 = sum of:
        0.011898145 = weight(_text_:information in 3458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011898145 = score(doc=3458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3458)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Zusammenfassung der Dissertation Vgl. auch: Garfield, E.: An algorithm for translating chemical names to molecular formulas. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1961. In: Essays of an information scientist. Vol. 7. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press, 1985. S.441-513.
  9. Garfield, E.: From citation indexes to informetrics : is the tail now wagging the dog? (1998) 0.00
    0.0029446408 = product of:
      0.011778563 = sum of:
        0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011778563 = score(doc=2809,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Provides a synoptic review and history of citation indexes and their evolution into research evaluation tools including a discussion of the use of bibliometric data for evaluating US institutions (academic departments) by the National Research Council (NRC). Covers the origin and uses of periodical impact factors, validation studies of citation analysis, information retrieval and dissemination (current awareness), citation consciousness, historiography and science mapping, Citation Classics, and the history of contemporary science. Illustrates the retrieval of information by cited reference searching, especially as it applies to avoiding duplicated research. Discusses the 15 year cumulative impacts of periodicals and the percentage of uncitedness, the emergence of scientometrics, old boy networks, and citation frequency distributions. Concludes with observations about the future of citation indexing
  10. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.00
    0.0029446408 = product of:
      0.011778563 = sum of:
        0.011778563 = weight(_text_:information in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011778563 = score(doc=6920,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1197-1202
  11. Garfield, E.: Random thoughts on citationology : Its theory and practice (1998) 0.00
    0.002379629 = product of:
      0.009518516 = sum of:
        0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009518516 = score(doc=5128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Theories of citation are as elusive as theories of information science, which have been debated for decade. Gives an overview of some of these theories, and as a basis for discussion offers the term citationology as the theory and practice of citation, including its derivative disciplines citation analysis and bibliometrics
  12. Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.00
    0.002379629 = product of:
      0.009518516 = sum of:
        0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009518516 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.5, S.400-412
  13. Garfield, E.: ¬An algorithm for translating chemical names to molecular formulas (1961) 0.00
    0.0021033147 = product of:
      0.008413259 = sum of:
        0.008413259 = weight(_text_:information in 3465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008413259 = score(doc=3465,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 3465, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3465)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This dissertation discusses, explains, and demonstrates a new algorithm for translating chemica l nomenclature into molecular formulas. In order to place the study in its proper context and perspective the historical development of nomenclature is first discussed, aa well as other related aspects of the chemical information problem. The relationship of nomenclature to modern linguistic studies is then introduced. Tire relevance of structural linguistic procedures to the study of chemical nomenclature is shown. The methods of the linguist are illustrated by examples from chemical discourse. The algorithm is then explained, first for the human translator and then for use by a computer. Flow diagrams for the computer syntactic analysis, dictionary Iook-up routine, and furmula calculation routine are included. The sampling procedure for testing the algorithm is explained and finalIy, conclusions are drawn with respect to the general validity of the method and the dirsction that might be taken for future research. A summary of modern chemical nomenclature practice is appened primarily for use by the reader who is not familiar with chemical nomenclature.
    Content
    Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1961. Vgl..: http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v7p441y1984.pdf. Auch in: Essays of an information scientist. Vol. 7. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press, 1985. S.441-513.
  14. Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996) 0.00
    0.0020821756 = product of:
      0.008328702 = sum of:
        0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008328702 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  15. Garfield, E.; Paris, S.W.; Stock, W.G.: HistCite(TM) : a software tool for informetric analysis of citation linkage (2006) 0.00
    0.0020821756 = product of:
      0.008328702 = sum of:
        0.008328702 = weight(_text_:information in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008328702 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.391-400
  16. Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002) 0.00
    0.0017847219 = product of:
      0.0071388874 = sum of:
        0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071388874 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1106-1112
  17. Garfield, E.: Citation indexing : its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (1979) 0.00
    0.0017847219 = product of:
      0.0071388874 = sum of:
        0.0071388874 = weight(_text_:information in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071388874 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    Philadelphia, PA : Institute for Scientific Information
  18. Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science (1985) 0.00
    0.0016826519 = product of:
      0.0067306077 = sum of:
        0.0067306077 = weight(_text_:information in 3632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067306077 = score(doc=3632,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 3632, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3632)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Indexes in general seek to provide a "key" to a body of literature intending to help the user in identifying, verifying, and/or locating individual or related items. The most common devices for collocation in indexes are authors' names and subjects. A different approach to collocating related items in an index is provided by a method called "citation indexing." Citation indexes attempt to link items through citations or references, in other works, by bringing together items cited in a particular work and the works citing a particular item. Citation indexing is based an the concept that there is a significant intellectual link between a document and each bibliographic item cited in it and that this link is useful to the scholar because an author's references to earlier writings identify relevant information to the subject of his current work. One of the major differences between the citation index and the traditional subject index is that the former, while listing current literature, also provides a retrospec tive view of past literature. While each issue of a traditional index is normally concerned only with the current literature, the citation index brings back retrospective literature in the form of cited references, thereby linking current scholarly works with earlier works. The advantages of the citation index have been considered to be its value as a tool for tracing the history of ideas or discoveries, for associating ideas between current and past work, and for evaluating works of individual authors or library collections. The concept of citation indexing is not new. It has been applied to legal literature since 1873 in a legal reference tool called Shepard's Citations. In the 1950s Eugene Garfield, a documentation consultant and founder and President of the Institute for Scientific Information (Philadelphia), developed the technique of citation indexing for scientific literature. This new application was facilitated by the availability of computer technology, resulting in a series of services: Science Citation Index (1955- ), Social Sciences Citation Index (1966- ), and the Arts & Humanities Index (1976- ). All three appear in printed versions and as machine-readable databases. In the following essay, the first in a series of articles and books elucidating the citation indexing system, Garfield traces the origin and beginning of this idea, its advantages, and the methods of preparing such indexes.
  19. Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002) 0.00
    0.0014872681 = product of:
      0.0059490725 = sum of:
        0.0059490725 = weight(_text_:information in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0059490725 = score(doc=5220,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.034944877 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1113-1119