-
Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.00
0.002379629 = product of:
0.009518516 = sum of:
0.009518516 = weight(_text_:information in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009518516 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Information Today, Inc.
-
De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008)
0.00
0.0016826519 = product of:
0.0067306077 = sum of:
0.0067306077 = weight(_text_:information in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067306077 = score(doc=3585,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- LCSH
- Information science / Statistical methods
- Subject
- Information science / Statistical methods
-
Beyond bibliometrics : harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly intent (2014)
0.00
0.0011898145 = product of:
0.004759258 = sum of:
0.004759258 = weight(_text_:information in 3026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004759258 = score(doc=3026,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3026, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3026)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Bibliometrics has moved well beyond the mere tracking of bibliographic citations. The web enables new ways to measure scholarly productivity and impact, making available tools and data that can reveal patterns of intellectual activity and impact that were previously invisible: mentions, acknowledgments, endorsements, downloads, recommendations, blog posts, tweets. This book describes recent theoretical and practical advances in metrics-based research, examining a variety of alternative metrics -- or "altmetrics" -- while also considering the ethical and cultural consequences of relying on metrics to assess the quality of scholarship. Once the domain of information scientists and mathematicians, bibliometrics is now a fast-growing, multidisciplinary field that ranges from webometrics to scientometrics to influmetrics. The contributors to Beyond Bibliometrics discuss the changing environment of scholarly publishing, the effects of open access and Web 2.0 on genres of discourse, novel analytic methods, and the emergence of next-generation metrics in a performance-conscious age.
-
Gingras, Y.: Bibliometrics and research evaluation : uses and abuses (2016)
0.00
0.0011898145 = product of:
0.004759258 = sum of:
0.004759258 = weight(_text_:information in 3805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004759258 = score(doc=3805,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06134496 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.034944877 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3805, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3805)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Series
- History and foundations of information science
