Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  1. Subject librarians : engaging with the learning and teaching environment (2006) 0.22
    0.21632348 = product of:
      0.30285287 = sum of:
        0.035168886 = weight(_text_:libraries in 1582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035168886 = score(doc=1582,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.2514596 = fieldWeight in 1582, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1582)
        0.0719955 = weight(_text_:relations in 1582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0719955 = score(doc=1582,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22145554 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.32510135 = fieldWeight in 1582, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.2016215 = idf(docFreq=661, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1582)
        0.026763318 = weight(_text_:with in 1582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026763318 = score(doc=1582,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.26086536 = fieldWeight in 1582, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1582)
        0.10920717 = weight(_text_:faculty in 1582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10920717 = score(doc=1582,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.44311303 = fieldWeight in 1582, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1582)
        0.059718005 = product of:
          0.11943601 = sum of:
            0.11943601 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 1582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11943601 = score(doc=1582,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.4187297 = fieldWeight in 1582, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1582)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
    
    Abstract
    The university subject librarians' role is at the centre of new models of teaching and learning, yet further debate and published contributions are still needed to shape its future direction. "Subject Librarians: Engaging with the Learning and Teaching Environment" assesses trends and challenges in current practice, and aims to encourage renewed thinking and improved approaches. Its editors and authors include experienced practitioners and academics. At a time of great change and increasing challenges in higher education, this book offers directors of academic services, library managers, librarians and lecturers a chance to reflect on the key issues and consider the needs of the learning community. "Subject Librarians: Engaging with the Learning and Teaching Environment" also provides a perspective on current practice and a reference source for students of Information Management and Information Studies.
    Content
    Inhalt: PART I THE SUBJECT SPECIALIST IN HIGHER EDUCATION The Subject Specialist in Higher Education - A Review of the Literature / Margaret Feetham Professional Engagement - The Subject Specialist in Higher Education / Penny Dale with Maggie Leharne, Trudi Knight and Kate Marshall Quality Assurance, Quality Enhancement / Jill Beard Learning and Teaching / Kerry Shephard Relating to Further Education - Partners and Franchises / Jane Ryland Virtual Learning Environments / Marian Matthews Changing Relationships in the University / Kerry Shephard and Marian Matthews PART II SERVING DIFFERENT CONSTITUENCIES Serving Different Constituencies: Undergraduates / Jenny Campbell and Pete Maggs Serving Different Constituencies: Asynchronous Learners / Janet Peters Serving Different Constituencies: Researchers / Matt Holland Serving Different Constituencies: International Students / Frank Frew PART III INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES A Review of International Trends in Library Faculty Support in Higher Education: A Special Focus on Southern African University Libraries / Buhle Mbambo PART IV CONCLUSION Conclusion / Penny Dale, Matt Holland and Marian Matthews
    LCSH
    Academic libraries / Relations with faculty and curriculum
    Subject
    Academic libraries / Relations with faculty and curriculum
  2. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.18
    0.17685798 = product of:
      0.30950144 = sum of:
        0.030457148 = weight(_text_:libraries in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030457148 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
        0.023177713 = weight(_text_:with in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023177713 = score(doc=135,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.22591603 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
        0.09457618 = weight(_text_:faculty in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09457618 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.38374713 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
        0.1612904 = sum of:
          0.12668101 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12668101 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042574327 = queryNorm
              0.4441299 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
          0.0346094 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0346094 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042574327 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The reference lists of forty-three education dissertations on curriculum and instruction completed at the University of Minnesota during the calendar years 2000-2002 were analyzed to inform collection development. As one measure of use of the academic library collection, the citation analysis yielded data to guide journal selection, retention, and cancellation decisions. The project aimed to ensure that the most frequently cited journals were retained on subscription. The serial monograph ratio for citation also was evaluated in comparison with other studies and explored in the context of funding ratios. Results of citation studies can provide a basis for liaison conversations with faculty in addition to guiding selection decisions. This research project can serve as a model for similar projects in other libraries that look at literature in education as well as other fields.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Buchanan, L.E.; Luck, D.L.; Jones, T.C.: Integrating information literacy into the virtual university : a course model (2002) 0.13
    0.13370769 = product of:
      0.23398845 = sum of:
        0.025380958 = weight(_text_:libraries in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025380958 = score(doc=44,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
        0.019314762 = weight(_text_:with in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019314762 = score(doc=44,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.18826336 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
        0.13650897 = weight(_text_:faculty in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13650897 = score(doc=44,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.5538913 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
        0.052783757 = product of:
          0.105567515 = sum of:
            0.105567515 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.105567515 = score(doc=44,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.37010825 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The virtual university environment provides librarians with new opportunities to contribute to the educational process. Building on the success of team-teaching a traditional liberal arts core course with composition and communications faculty, librarians and a communications professor worked together to integrate the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2000) into the online environment. The resulting graduate-level course in multimedia literacy assembled faculty and curriculum resources normally untapped in traditional classrooms. All five information literacy standards covering need, access, evaluation, use and the social, economic, legal, and ethical issues surrounding information use were addressed. Readings and threaded discussions about intellectual property, fair use of copyrighted materials, the evaluation of free and fee-based Web information and Web page design and construction prepared students to work in groups to design and construct Web sites. Students also completed a capstone project in the form of individual Web portfolios, which demonstrated the information and multimedia principles they learned in the class. Assessment of information literacy skills occurred through the analysis of student discussion, evaluative annotations, Web site assignments, perception surveys, and a master's level comprehensive exam question. What was learned in this course will serve as a model for future collaborative partnerships in which faculty and librarians work together to ensure that students who learn from a distance truly master information literacy competencies.
  4. Borgman, C.L.; Smart, L.J.; Millwood, K.A.; Finley, J.R.; Champeny, L.; Gilliland, A.J.; Leazer, G.H.: Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research : implications for the design of digital libraries (2005) 0.13
    0.13136502 = product of:
      0.22988877 = sum of:
        0.04060953 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04060953 = score(doc=3231,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.29036054 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
        0.010926079 = weight(_text_:with in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010926079 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.10649783 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
        0.1668167 = weight(_text_:faculty in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1668167 = score(doc=3231,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.6768663 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
        0.011536467 = product of:
          0.023072934 = sum of:
            0.023072934 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023072934 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    ADEPT is a 5-year project whose goals are to develop, deploy, and evaluate inquiry learning capabilities for the Alexandria Digital Library, an extant digital library of primary sources in geography. We interviewed nine geography faculty members who teach undergraduate courses about their information seeking for research and teaching and their use of information resources in teaching. These data were supplemented by interviews with four faculty members from another ADEPT study about the nature of knowledge in geography. Among our key findings are that geography faculty are more likely to encounter useful teaching resources while seeking research resources than vice versa, although the influence goes in both directions. Their greatest information needs are for research data, maps, and images. They desire better searching by concept or theme, in addition to searching by location and place name. They make extensive use of their own research resources in their teaching. Among the implications for functionality and architecture of geographic digital libraries for educational use are that personal digital libraries are essential, because individual faculty members have personalized approaches to selecting, collecting, and organizing teaching resources. Digital library services for research and teaching should include the ability to import content from common office software and to store content in standard formats that can be exported to other applications. Digital library services can facilitate sharing among faculty but cannot overcome barriers such as intellectual property rights, access to proprietary research data, or the desire of individuals to maintain control over their own resources. Faculty use of primary and secondary resources needs to be better understood if we are to design successful digital libraries for research and teaching.
    Date
    3. 6.2005 20:40:22
  5. Creth, S.D.: ¬The information arcade : playground for the mind (1994) 0.12
    0.12184125 = product of:
      0.42644435 = sum of:
        0.15762697 = weight(_text_:faculty in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15762697 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.6395786 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
        0.26881737 = sum of:
          0.21113503 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.21113503 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042574327 = queryNorm
              0.7402165 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
          0.057682335 = weight(_text_:22 in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057682335 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042574327 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The information arcade at the main library, University of Iowa encourage and facilitates the integration of electronic information resources into the academic curriculum and into research activities. It is the result of a collaboration between librarians, faculty and computing staff. Describes how the service was set up and the services it provides
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 20(1994) no.1, S.22-23
  6. Education for library cataloging : international perspectives (2006) 0.11
    0.10973652 = product of:
      0.1920389 = sum of:
        0.021980554 = weight(_text_:libraries in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021980554 = score(doc=207,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.15716225 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
        0.018067306 = weight(_text_:with in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018067306 = score(doc=207,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.17610425 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
        0.078813486 = weight(_text_:faculty in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078813486 = score(doc=207,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.3197893 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
        0.073177546 = sum of:
          0.052783757 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052783757 = score(doc=207,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042574327 = queryNorm
              0.18505412 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
          0.020393785 = weight(_text_:22 in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.020393785 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042574327 = queryNorm
              0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Classification
    025.3/071 22
    Content
    Inhalt: Education and training for cataloguing at the University of Botswana Library : an overview / Rose Tiny Kgosiemang -- The relevance of cataloguing in library science curriculum in Cross River State of Nigeria in this technological age / J.I. Iwe -- The education and training of cataloguing students in South Africa through distance education / Linda M. Cloete -- Education of cataloging and classification in China / Zhanghua Ma -- The status quo and future development of cataloging and classification education in China / Li Si -- Education for knowledge organization : the Indian scene / K.S. Raghavan -- Current status of cataloging and classification education in Japan / Shoichi Taniguchi -- A study on the job training and self-training of the cataloging and classification librarians working in South Korean academic libraries / Chul-Wan Kwak -- Beyond our expectations : a review of an independent learning module in descriptive cataloguing at the Queensland University of for cataloguing and classification in Australia / Ross Harvey, Susan Reynolds -- Education for cataloging and classification in Austria and Germany / Monika Münnich, Heidi Zotter-Straka, Petra Hauke -- Education and training on studies and professional librarianship schools / Anna Sitarska -- Cataloging education on the sunny side of the Alps / Jerry D. Saye, Alenka ^Sauperl -- Education for cataloging in Spanish universities : a descriptive and López-Cózar -- Education and training for cataloguing and classification in the British Isles / J.H. Bowman -- The teaching of information processing in the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina / Elsa E. Barber, Silvia L. Pisano -- Education for cataloging and classification in Mexico / Filiberto Felipe Martínez Arellano -- Education for cataloging and related areas in Peru / Ana María Talavera Ibarra -- Cataloging and classification education in Egypt : stressing the fundamentals while moving toward automated applications / Mohammed Fat'hy Abdel Hady, Ali Kamal Shaker -- An account of cataloging and classification education in Iranian universities / Mortaza Kokabi -- Cataloging instruction in Israel / Snunith Shoham -- Continuing education for catalogers in Saudi Arabia / Zahiruddin Khurshid.
    DDC
    025.3/071 22
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 33(2006) no.2, S.119-20 (S.S. Intner): "This survey of cataloging education around the world offers readers a rich menu of experiences, educational offerings, and approaches to the subject of cataloging education as it is currently practiced in 24 countries of the world, excluding the United States and Canada. The exclusion does not mean that English-speaking countries are entirely absent from the book, however. Two nations outside North America, South Africa (in one chapter) and Australia (in two chapters), are covered. The chapters are organized geographically, beginning with the African continent, and followed by several each under headings for Asia, Australia (two chapters), Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Nations whose cataloging education programs are described include (in order of presentation) Botswana, Nigeria, South Africa, China (both the People's Republic of China and Taiwan), India, Japan, South Korea, Australia, Austria and Germany (described together in one chapter), Poland, Slovenia, Spain, the British Isles (England, Scotland, and Wales), Argentina, Mexico, Peru, Egypt, Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. As readers might expect, many chapters reflect common experiences among the countries, particularly regarding the proliferation of subjects in competition with cataloging and classification in library school curricula. There are also some common problems, such as dealing with the changes in education and training prompted by automation. Generally, computer-based cataloging is not a new issue anywhere, although in some areas of the world, catalogers still work with manual systems. Describing cataloging education in Nigeria, J. I. Iwe states: "... the card catalogue is still being used in all libraries, including the University of Calabar library where the only library school in the state exists (p. 33)." In other places, computer infrastructure has developed to a level that supports coursework online. As Linda M. Cloete writes, "The ultimate goal of the training resource program is to develop an online, fully interactive course: an online virtual cataloging classroom (p. 66)."
    The eternal debate in the teaching of cataloging over theory versus practice emerges in this volume. As Li Si suggests in describing cataloging education in the People's Republic of China, the matter might be laid at the door of the faculty, stating, "Although the majority of teaching faculty members in the library and information science programs have a solid theoretical foundation from their school education and training, they do not normally possess practical work experience in their field of specialty and they are not familiar with the application of technologies in the field. In order to enhance their practical skills, these faculty members should be given the opportunity to work in libraries... This way, they would be able to put theory into practice and gain rich, practical field experience, thus improving the relevance and quality of their teaching (p. 97)." One wonders how warmly faculty members would welcome that kind of opportunity! On the other hand, in many places, onthe-job training is weak, as Shoichi Taniguchi describes it in Japan, "on the job training and continuing education are neither encouraged nor promoted (p. 132)." Among the most interesting and important aspects of this book are the tables of hard data it presents. Almost every chapter reports on surveys done by the authors on the state of library education in general and/or the kinds of offerings in cataloging and classification available within their countries. Some authors also include statistics on the numbers of persons receiving certificates, diplomas, and/or master's degrees, which is useful in understanding the different levels of expertise being developed over time. While one could argue that there are gaps in coverage, with large, influential countries such as France and Italy in Europe, Brazil, Bolivia, and Chile in South America, and Thailand and Myanmar in Asia, left out of the book, for the most part there is good representation from different parts of the globe. Education for Library Cataloging is a good choice as a textbook for coursework in International Librarianship as well as a primer in what to expect if one's information center is affiliated with partners outside the United States and Canada. This book should be seen as an important "must read" for all library students and practitioners concerned about issues of increasing globalization in bibliographic control. It is highly recommended."
  7. ¬The library's guide to graphic novels (2020) 0.10
    0.09531178 = product of:
      0.16679561 = sum of:
        0.053300012 = weight(_text_:libraries in 717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053300012 = score(doc=717,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.3810982 = fieldWeight in 717, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=717)
        0.021377524 = weight(_text_:with in 717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021377524 = score(doc=717,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.20836936 = fieldWeight in 717, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=717)
        0.055169437 = weight(_text_:faculty in 717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055169437 = score(doc=717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.22385249 = fieldWeight in 717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=717)
        0.036948632 = product of:
          0.073897265 = sum of:
            0.073897265 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.073897265 = score(doc=717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.2590758 = fieldWeight in 717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The circ stats say it all: graphic novels' popularity among library users keeps growing, with more being published (and acquired by libraries) each year. The unique challenges of developing and managing a graphics novels collection have led the Association of Library Collections and Technical Services (ALCTS) to craft this guide, presented under the expert supervision of editor Ballestro, who has worked with comics for more than 35 years. Examining the ever-changing ways that graphic novels are created, packaged, marketed, and released, this resource gathers a range of voices from the field to explore such topics as: a cultural history of comics and graphic novels from their World War II origins to today, providing a solid grounding for newbies and fresh insights for all; catching up on the Big Two's reboots: Marvel's 10 and DC's 4; five questions to ask when evaluating nonfiction graphic novels and 30 picks for a core collection; key publishers and cartoonists to consider when adding international titles; developing a collection that supports curriculum and faculty outreach to ensure wide usage, with catalogers' tips for organizing your collection and improving discovery; real-world examples of how libraries treat graphic novels, such as an in-depth profile of the development of Penn Library's Manga collection; how to integrate the emerging field of graphic medicine into the collection; and specialized resources like The Cartoonists of Color and Queer Cartoonists databases, the open access scholarly journal Comic Grid, and the No Flying, No Tights website. Packed with expert guidance and useful information, this guide will assist technical services staff, catalogers, and acquisition and collection management librarians.
    Content
    Inhalt: Between the Panels: A Cultural History of Comic Books and Graphic Novels / by Joshua Everett -- Graphic Novel Companies, Reboots, and Numbering / by John Ballestro -- Creating and Developing a Graphic Literature Collection in an Academic Library / by Andrea Kingston -- Non-Fiction Graphic Novels / by Carli Spina -- Fiction Graphic Novels / by Kayla Kuni -- International Comics and Graphic Novels / by Emily Drew, Lucia Serantes, and Amie Wright -- Building a Japanese Manga Collection for Non-Traditional Patrons in an Academic Library / by Molly Desjardins and Michael P. Williams -- Graphic Medicine in Your Library: Ideas and Strategies for Collecting Comics about Healthcare / by Alice Jaggers, Matthew Noe, and Ariel Pomputius -- The Nuts and Bolts of Comics Cataloging / by Allison Bailund, Hallie Clawson, and Staci Crouch -- Teaching and Programming with Graphic Novels in Academic Libraries / by Jacob Gordon and Sarah Kern.
    LCSH
    Libraries / Special collections / Graphic novels
    Libraries / Special collections / Comic books, strips, etc.
    Academic libraries / Collection development
    Subject
    Libraries / Special collections / Graphic novels
    Libraries / Special collections / Comic books, strips, etc.
    Academic libraries / Collection development
  8. Pinto, M.: Assessing disciplinary differences in faculty perceptions of information literacy competencies (2016) 0.09
    0.08799549 = product of:
      0.20532282 = sum of:
        0.015451809 = weight(_text_:with in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015451809 = score(doc=2963,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.15061069 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
        0.17833455 = weight(_text_:faculty in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17833455 = score(doc=2963,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.7236005 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
        0.011536467 = product of:
          0.023072934 = sum of:
            0.023072934 = weight(_text_:22 in 2963) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023072934 = score(doc=2963,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2963, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2963)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - Uncovering faculty members' conceptions of Information Literacy (IL), as well as exploring their perceptions with regard to the importance given to a previously defined set of core IL competences grouped into four categories: searching, evaluation, processing and communication and dissemination. Ascertaining the possible differences among the five knowledge branches (arts and humanities, sciences, social and legal sciences, health sciences, and technical disciplines); and understanding the importance granted to a set of learning improvement initiatives by the faculty. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach - The survey was completed by a set of faculty members from the University of Granada (Spain). Data were collected using the IL-HUMASS survey. The research is based on subjective data, first approached from a descriptive point of view. Later, data correlation, analysis and non-parametric tests were used with the goal of finding significant differences of faculty perceptions among the relevant academic areas. Findings - Results suggest that more than half of the surveyed faculty have what the authors define as an Academic Concept of IL. The IL categories of communica\tion and dissemination and searching were graded in significance by the staff as being "very important," while those of evaluation and processing were assigned a slightly lesser rating of "important." Results suggest that IL awareness falls into two broad groups differentiated by subject discipline: those from health sciences, social and legal sciences and arts and humanities representing the first group, and sciences and technical disciplines the other. Research limitations/implications - This approach address the subjective status of faculty concepts in a single university, but also in all knowledge branches. Future research is needed. Originality/value - This is one of the few papers regarding faculty perceptions of IL.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Tompkins, P.; Perry, S.; Lippincott, J.K.: New learning communities : collaboration, networking, and information literacy (1998) 0.08
    0.080731645 = product of:
      0.18837383 = sum of:
        0.030457148 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030457148 = score(doc=3334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 3334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3334)
        0.09457618 = weight(_text_:faculty in 3334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09457618 = score(doc=3334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.38374713 = fieldWeight in 3334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3334)
        0.06334051 = product of:
          0.12668101 = sum of:
            0.12668101 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 3334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12668101 = score(doc=3334,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.4441299 = fieldWeight in 3334, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Coalition for Networked Information's (CNI) New Learning Communities Program was developed to support pioneers in education who use networks and networked information to support student centred teaching and learning. The programme focuses on 3 trends: the increased availability of computer networks in higher education, specifically the Internet; the need for students to develop information literacy skills as part of the curriculum; and the increasing importance of collaboration in both teaching and learning and the technological society. The Coalition for Networked Information brings together pioneer teams from higher education institutions and these teams: which can include faculty, librarians, information technologists, students and instructional designers; have developed new courses that use networking technologies and place emphasis on networked information resources. Through a series of workshops and conferences, a videotape and a Web site; CNI supported the pioneer temas and disseminated the lessons learned from their projects to others in the higher education community
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 17(1998) no.2, S.100-106
  10. Frâncu, V.; Popescu, T.: Twenty years after : scientific research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania (1993-2012) (2014) 0.08
    0.07881703 = product of:
      0.1379298 = sum of:
        0.025380958 = weight(_text_:libraries in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025380958 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
        0.019314762 = weight(_text_:with in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019314762 = score(doc=4692,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.18826336 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
        0.078813486 = weight(_text_:faculty in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078813486 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.3197893 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
        0.014420584 = product of:
          0.028841168 = sum of:
            0.028841168 = weight(_text_:22 in 4692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028841168 = score(doc=4692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The main point that we want to state in this study is that research in the field of knowledge organization in Romania over the last twenty years is unequally and unjustly distributed among different professional categories ranging from library and information science faculty members, library professionals, software tools developers and independent researchers. The special condition of library and information science functioning as a university department in Romania with an interruption of 20 years (1970-1990) affected the overall situation of scientific research in the specific fields associated with this discipline. Our study has three stages: data collection, data recording and data interpretation. The primary outcomes of the scientific research activities considered are publications (books, book chapters and journal articles). Given this, our interest will be directed towards analyzing to what extent research and writing for publication have an impact on the evolution of Romanian libraries over this twenty years span.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  11. Chen, K.-n.; Lin, P.-c.: Information literacy in university library user education (2011) 0.08
    0.07624305 = product of:
      0.17790045 = sum of:
        0.013657599 = weight(_text_:with in 4538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013657599 = score(doc=4538,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.1331223 = fieldWeight in 4538, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4538)
        0.11145909 = weight(_text_:faculty in 4538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11145909 = score(doc=4538,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.4522503 = fieldWeight in 4538, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4538)
        0.052783757 = product of:
          0.105567515 = sum of:
            0.105567515 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 4538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.105567515 = score(doc=4538,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.37010825 = fieldWeight in 4538, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4538)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The aim of this paper is to determine the essential features of information literacy; what role it should play in university library user education; and how programs can be best implemented. Design/methodology/approach - The researchers systemically surveyed and reviewed publications related to information literacy and library user education. Findings - It was found that a well-designed information literacy program benefits the library and its staff, faculty, and students; librarians should play a leading role in the design and operation of programs, but collaboration with faculty, IT professionals and students is essential; programs should be embedded in the curriculum, be largely cooperative, and be problem-based; evaluation and assessment are essential components; emphasis should be placed on first-year students; and, ideally, the librarians will turn into educators and the library will become a learning center combining learning, research and technology. Research limitations/implications - This paper reflects the opinions of the researchers and the authors of the reviewed literature who have insights into the issues related to information literacy and library user education. These opinions present useful guidelines for both librarian and teacher practitioners. Originality/value - This paper provides a point of view on the relationship between information literacy and library user education in the six themes described above.
  12. Benedetti, S.; Wu, A.; Hayes, S.: Art in a medium-sized university library : acquisition, cataloging, and access issues: challenges and opportunities (2004) 0.08
    0.07558437 = product of:
      0.13227263 = sum of:
        0.025380958 = weight(_text_:libraries in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025380958 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.18147534 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
        0.013657599 = weight(_text_:with in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013657599 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.1331223 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
        0.078813486 = weight(_text_:faculty in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078813486 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.3197893 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
        0.014420584 = product of:
          0.028841168 = sum of:
            0.028841168 = weight(_text_:22 in 133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028841168 = score(doc=133,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 133, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=133)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    In 2001, the William Madison Randall Library at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington found itself with a substantial collection of art, acquired over time through gifts and purchases to augment existing collections of faculty scholarship and regional materials. What had been tracked in a simple administrative database had become a collection deserving improved access. This paper outlines the acquisition, cataloging, and access issues that shaped the evolution of the art works from their status first as decoration on the library walls, then as fully cataloged library materials in the online catalog, then as digitized images available in a searchable Web tour. Explored are the reasons behind the collection development push and the methods of acquisition, how and why the collection outgrew its original inventory database, and why the university librarian turned to catalog librarians for solutions to improve access by utilizing and linking data existing in separate databases. The paper offers implications and lessons learned that could assist other libraries that may face such a challenge, as well as a literature review of the issues faced in art documentation. Randall Library's experience illustrates how a decision to invest in cataloging an unusual medium can go beyond the basics of author and subject access to create an unusually valuable foundation for promotional, curricular and Web-based ventures.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Rankin, K.L.: Video cataloguing : reducing backlogs (1996) 0.07
    0.07116902 = product of:
      0.16606104 = sum of:
        0.035533343 = weight(_text_:libraries in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035533343 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.25406548 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
        0.110338874 = weight(_text_:faculty in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.110338874 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.44770497 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
        0.020188818 = product of:
          0.040377636 = sum of:
            0.040377636 = weight(_text_:22 in 6934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040377636 = score(doc=6934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    At the University of Nevada, Las Vergas (UNLV), increases in student population and the creation of new academic programmes resulted in the recruitment of additional teaching faculty. This growth increased acquisitions budgets and collections. Library staff then faced a cataloguing backlog of hundreds of video titles. Describes how the library solved the backlog problem by implementing 'cataloguing shortcuts'. Outlines the previous cataloguing process and the elements which were streamlined by implementing shortcuts. The number of videos catalogued went from 604 in the 1991/2 academic year (prior to the shortcuts) to 804 titles in 1992/3 and 883 titles in 1993/4. The Special Formats Cataloguer now has time to work on formats other than video
    Date
    27.11.1995 17:07:22
    Source
    College and undergraduate libraries. 3(1996) no.1, S.69-78
  14. Loesch, M.F.; Deyrup, M.M.: Cataloging the curriculum library : new procedures for non-traditional formats (2002) 0.07
    0.070153594 = product of:
      0.24553758 = sum of:
        0.12610157 = weight(_text_:faculty in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12610157 = score(doc=5472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.51166284 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
        0.11943601 = product of:
          0.23887202 = sum of:
            0.23887202 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 5472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23887202 = score(doc=5472,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.8374594 = fieldWeight in 5472, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This report examines some of the technical problems of integrating a curriculum resource center into an academic library setting. Procedures for conducting an inventory of existing materials, processing multi-media and other non-print formats, and displaying and retrieving materials within a Web OPAC are discussed. An analysis of how cataloging staff can use the new ACRL standards to reshape how students and faculty access information resources is provided.
  15. Speier, C.; Palmer, J.; Wren, D.; Hahn, S.: Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication : a question of prestige and legitimacy (1999) 0.07
    0.06899636 = product of:
      0.24148726 = sum of:
        0.21841434 = weight(_text_:faculty in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21841434 = score(doc=3674,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.88622606 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
        0.023072934 = product of:
          0.046145868 = sum of:
            0.046145868 = weight(_text_:22 in 3674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046145868 = score(doc=3674,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3674, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3674)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Recent years have seen a proliferation of electronic journals across academic disciplines. Electronic journals offer many advantages to multiple constituencies, however, their acceptance by faculty and university promotion and tenure committees is unclear. This research examines perceptions of faculty and promotion and tenure committee members regarding the perceived prestige and legitimacy of electronic journals as an outlet for scholarly communication
    Date
    22. 5.1999 14:43:47
  16. Boon, S.; Johnston, B.; Webber, S.: ¬A phenomenographic study of English faculty's conceptions of information literacy (2007) 0.06
    0.064676575 = product of:
      0.150912 = sum of:
        0.019314762 = weight(_text_:with in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019314762 = score(doc=829,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.18826336 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
        0.078813486 = weight(_text_:faculty in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078813486 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.3197893 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
        0.052783757 = product of:
          0.105567515 = sum of:
            0.105567515 = weight(_text_:curriculum in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.105567515 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28523415 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.37010825 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.699675 = idf(docFreq=147, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this research is to identify UK English academics' conceptions of information literacy and compare those conceptions with current information literacy standards and frameworks. Design/methodology/approach - Three year AHRB-funded study involving 80 academics interviewed throughout the UK and using the phenomenographic research method to discover variation in experience leading towards identification of qualitatively different conceptions of information literacy. Conceptions are then reviewed in light of previous research and current librarian-generated frameworks and standards. Findings - The findings identify UK English academics' conceptions of information literacy and show them to be both similar to and significantly different from conceptions described in previous research and librarian-generated frameworks and standards. Research limitations/implications - The research focuses on creating a conceptual snapshot-in-time for the 20 English academics taking part. The research implies that disciplinary differences in conception of information literacy are significant and suggests further research to assess disciplinary conceptual differences. Practical implications - Librarians working with English faculty on information literacy need to be aware of differences in conception between themselves and academics to work effectively. The paper also highlights the significance of information literacy in English faculty's teaching and research practices and this relevance suggests that information literacy should be integrated into course and curriculum design. Originality/value - The paper fills a major gap in literature on information literacy by focussing on conceptions of lecturers, thereby counterbalancing the abundance of work produced by librarians. The paper illustrates the complexity of English academics' conceptions of information literacy and informs academics' use and understanding of information literacy.
  17. Albert, E.: Vpliv knjiznicarjevega vedenja na uspesnost referencne sluzbe v Slovenskih splosnoizobrazevalnih knjiznicah (1998) 0.06
    0.061002016 = product of:
      0.14233804 = sum of:
        0.030457148 = weight(_text_:libraries in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030457148 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
        0.09457618 = weight(_text_:faculty in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09457618 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.38374713 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
        0.0173047 = product of:
          0.0346094 = sum of:
            0.0346094 = weight(_text_:22 in 3049) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0346094 = score(doc=3049,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3049, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3049)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The authors are students of librarianship in the faculty of philosophy at Ljubljana University, Slovenia. Users were asked to describe their library visits and summarise what was most helpful and least helpful about the service received. In the list of best practices, the most frequent feature was that the staff member really listened (58,9%). Other aspects of most helpful behaviour (e.g. using different body language, showing genuine interest, willingness to investigate further) occured in less than 40% of the interviews. 3 features of least helpful behaviour were listed in more than 30% of the cases; not asking the user anything about the question and making no effort to determine the specific need, not telling the user what he/she was doing, making no effort to determine whether the user had found the relevant information
    Date
    22. 2.1999 19:29:43
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: The influence of the librarian's behaviour on the effectiveness of reference services in Slovene public libraries
  18. Bates, M.J.: Speculations on browsing, directed searching, and linking in relation to the Bradford distribution (2002) 0.06
    0.061002016 = product of:
      0.14233804 = sum of:
        0.030457148 = weight(_text_:libraries in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030457148 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13985899 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.2177704 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2850544 = idf(docFreq=4499, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
        0.09457618 = weight(_text_:faculty in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09457618 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.38374713 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
        0.0173047 = product of:
          0.0346094 = sum of:
            0.0346094 = weight(_text_:22 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0346094 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/Searching_Bradford-m020430.html.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    Imprint
    Greenwood Village, Co. : Libraries Unlimited
  19. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.06
    0.057882257 = product of:
      0.1350586 = sum of:
        0.023177713 = weight(_text_:with in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023177713 = score(doc=994,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.102594376 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.22591603 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.409771 = idf(docFreq=10797, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.09457618 = weight(_text_:faculty in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09457618 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.38374713 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.0173047 = product of:
          0.0346094 = sum of:
            0.0346094 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0346094 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  20. Ashoor, M.S.; Kanamugire, A.B.: Responding to researchers' and faculty use patterns and perceptions of CD-ROM services (1996) 0.06
    0.057544995 = product of:
      0.20140748 = sum of:
        0.17833455 = weight(_text_:faculty in 3723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17833455 = score(doc=3723,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24645443 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042574327 = queryNorm
            0.7236005 = fieldWeight in 3723, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.788804 = idf(docFreq=367, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3723)
        0.023072934 = product of:
          0.046145868 = sum of:
            0.046145868 = weight(_text_:22 in 3723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046145868 = score(doc=3723,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14908804 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042574327 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3723, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3723)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a brief report of a study of the use patterns and perception of faculty and researchers regarding CD-ROM services at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Library, Saudi Arabia. The main objectives were: to ascertain use patterns and perceptions of CD-ROM services; and to elicit comments which would be used in developing a planning strategy to expand and enhance CD-ROM services
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:10:24

Years

Languages

  • e 40
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 31
  • m 9
  • s 5
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…