-
Best practices in teaching digital literacies (2018)
0.26
0.25970218 = product of:
0.46746388 = sum of:
0.0068403445 = weight(_text_:information in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068403445 = score(doc=5039,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
0.18702495 = weight(_text_:literacy in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18702495 = score(doc=5039,freq=12.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.7936317 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
0.057478435 = weight(_text_:study in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057478435 = score(doc=5039,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.4399686 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
0.19659208 = weight(_text_:teaching in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19659208 = score(doc=5039,freq=18.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.900482 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
0.019528063 = product of:
0.039056126 = sum of:
0.039056126 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 5039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039056126 = score(doc=5039,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16854395 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 5039, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5039)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Abstract
- The almost universal reliance upon digital tools for social, academic, and career development will only become more pronounced in the years to come. Teacher education programs remain ill-equipped to adequately prepare educators with the pedagogies needed to foster digital literacies. What is needed is a set of best practices towards teaching digital literacies so that teachers can better meet the emerging needs of their students in today's classrooms. Where should teachers begin? What are the essentials of digital literacies within K-12 contexts? And how might we reimagine teacher education programs to optimally prepare teachers for working with technologically connected youth, whose literacies are more complex, interconnected, and diverse than ever?This edited volume provides a practical framework for teacher education programs to develop K-12 students' digital literacies. It serves as a set of best practices in teaching digital literacies that promotes access to research-based pedagogies for immediate implementation in their classrooms
- LCSH
- Language and languages / Study and teaching
Media literacy / Study and teaching
Internet literacy / Study and teaching
Computers and literacy
- Series
- Literary research, practice and evaluation; 9
- Subject
- Language and languages / Study and teaching
Media literacy / Study and teaching
Internet literacy / Study and teaching
Computers and literacy
- Theme
- Information
-
Henderson, L.; Tallman, J.I.: Stimulated recall and mental models : tools for teaching and learning computer information literacy (2006)
0.23
0.22786266 = product of:
0.34179398 = sum of:
0.014101732 = weight(_text_:information in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014101732 = score(doc=1717,freq=34.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.19992396 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
0.035642955 = weight(_text_:resource in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035642955 = score(doc=1717,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19147538 = queryWeight, product of:
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.18614903 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
0.14284267 = weight(_text_:literacy in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14284267 = score(doc=1717,freq=28.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.6061462 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
0.03710217 = weight(_text_:study in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03710217 = score(doc=1717,freq=20.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.28399852 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
0.09829604 = weight(_text_:teaching in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09829604 = score(doc=1717,freq=18.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.450241 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
0.013808426 = product of:
0.027616853 = sum of:
0.027616853 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027616853 = score(doc=1717,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16854395 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.1638555 = fieldWeight in 1717, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(6/9)
- Content
- Inhalt: The research study - Mental models - Stimulated recall methodology - Mental models emphasizing procedural and product goals - Mental models facilitating procedural and conceptual understanding - The role of stimulated recall in identifying the effects of mental models on teaching - Use of mental models to analyze and understand teachers' pedagogies
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.3, S.456-457 (D. Cook): "In February 2006, the Educational Testing Service (ETS) announced the release of its brand new core academic assessment of its Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy Assessment. The core assessment is designed to assess the information literacy of high school students transitioning to higher education. Many of us already know ETS for some of its other assessment tools like the SAT and GRE. But ETS's latest test comes on the heels of its 2005 release of an advanced level of its ICT Literacy Assessment for college students progressing to their junior and senior year of undergraduate studies. Neither test, ETS insists, is designed to be an entrance examination. Rather, they are packaged and promoted as diagnostic assessments. We are in the grips of the Information Age where information literacy is a prized skill. Knowledge is power. However, information literacy is not merely creating flawless documents or slick PowerPoint presentations on a home PC. It is more than being able to send photos and text messages via cell phone. Instead, information literacy is gauged by one's ability to skillfully seek, access, and retrieve valid information from credible and reliable sources and using that information appropriately. It involves strong online search strategies and advanced critical thinking skills. And, although it is not clear whether they seized the opportunity or inherited it by default, librarians are in the vanguard of teaching information literacy to the next generation of would-be power brokers.
The release of Stimulated Recall and Mental Models, therefore, could not have been timelier. It describes an empirical qualitative, case study research conducted by authors Lyn Henderson and Julie Tallman in which they studied the mental models of school librarians teaching K-12 students how to use electronic databases. In this research, funded by the Spencer Foundation, Henderson and Tallman studied and analyzed the mental models of their subjects, six American and four Australian school librarians, as they went about the task of teaching students one-on-one how to access and retrieve the information they needed for class assignments from electronic databases. Each librarian and student underwent a structured pre-lesson interview to ascertain their mental models (the sum of their prior learning and experiences) regarding the upcoming lesson. The lesson followed immediately and was carefully video- and audio-recorded, with the full knowledge of the librarian and her student. After the lessons, both student and librarian were interviewed with the intent of learning what each were thinking and feeling at specific points during the lesson, using the recordings as memory joggers. After the first librarian-pupil session, the student was freed but the librarian was re-studied tutoring a second learner. Again, the teacher and new student were preinterviewed, their lesson was recorded, and they were debriefed using the recordings for stimulated recall. It is important to note here the use of the recordings to create stimulated recall. Though considered a dubious practice by many respected researchers, Henderson and Tallman expend considerable time and effort in this book trying to establish the credibility of stimulated recall as a valid research tool. I find it interesting that the authors report that their realization of the value of stimulated recall was a collateral benefit of their study; they claim the original objective of their research was to analyze and compare the pre- and post-lesson mental models of the teacher-librarians (p.15). Apparently, this realization provided the inspiration for this book (pp. I & 208). Hence, its place of importance in the book's title.
This book is evidence that Henderson and Tallman were meticulous in following their established protocols and especially in their record keeping while conducting their research. There are, however, a few issues in the study's framework and methodology that are worth noting. First, although the research was conducted in two different countries - the United Slates and Australia - it is not clear from the writing if the librarian-pupil pairs of each country hailed from the same schools (making the population opportunistic) or if the sampling was indeed more randomly selected. Readers do know, though, that the librarians were free to select the students they tutored from within their respective schools. Thus, there appears to he no randomness. Second, "[t]he data collection tools and questionnaires were grounded in a [single] pilot study with a [single] teacher-Iibrarian" (p. 7). Neither the procedures used nor the data collected from the pilot study are presented to establish its reliability and validity. Therefore, readers are left with only limited confidence in the study's instrumentation. Further, it is obvious from the reading, and admitted by the researchers, that the recording equipment in open view of the study's subjects skewed the data. That is, one of the librarians tinder study confessed that were it not for the cameras, she would have completely deserted one of her lessons when encountering what she perceived to be overwhelming obstacles: a classic example of the Hawthorne Effect in research. Yet. despite these issues, researchers Henderson and Tallman make a respectable ease in this book for the validity of both mental models and stimulated recall. The mental models developed during the prelesson interviews seem remarkably accurate when observing the school librarians during the lessons. Additionally, while the librarians were able to adapt their lessons based on situations, they generally did so within their mental models of what constitutes good teachers and good teaching.
As for the value of reflecting on their teaching performance, the authors report the not-so-startling denouement that while it is easy to identify and define malpractice and to commit to changing performance errors, it is often difficult to actually implement those improvements. Essentially, what is first learned is best learned and what is most used is best used. In the end, however, the authors rightfully call for further study to be conducted by themselves and others. ETS's core ICT Literacy Assessment is not currently a mandatory college entrance examination. Neither is the advanced ICT Literacy Assessment a mandatory examination for promotion to upper level undergraduate studies. But it would be naïve not to expect some enterprising institutions of higher education to at least consider making them so in the very near future. Consequently, librarians of all stripes (public. academic, school, or others) would do well to read and study Stimulated Recall and Mental Models if they are truly committed to leading the charge on advancing information literacy in the Information Age. In this book are some valuable how-tos for instructing patrons on searching electronic databases. And some of those same principles could be applicable to other areas of information literacy instruction."
- LCSH
- Electronic information resource literacy / Study and teaching / Evaluation
- Series
- Research methods in library and information studies ; 2
- Subject
- Electronic information resource literacy / Study and teaching / Evaluation
-
Handbuch Informationskompetenz (2016)
0.21
0.2147454 = product of:
0.3221181 = sum of:
0.012236381 = weight(_text_:information in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012236381 = score(doc=4361,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.1734784 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
0.0403254 = weight(_text_:resource in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0403254 = score(doc=4361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19147538 = queryWeight, product of:
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.21060358 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
0.13658373 = weight(_text_:literacy in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13658373 = score(doc=4361,freq=10.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.5795867 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
0.026548153 = weight(_text_:study in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026548153 = score(doc=4361,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.2032128 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
0.090802 = weight(_text_:teaching in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.090802 = score(doc=4361,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.41591486 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
0.01562245 = product of:
0.0312449 = sum of:
0.0312449 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 4361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0312449 = score(doc=4361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16854395 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.18538132 = fieldWeight in 4361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(6/9)
- Content
- Zur Einführung: Neudefinition von Informationskompetenz notwendig? -- Grundlagen, Methoden, Technologien -- Informationskompetenz anders denken - zum epistemologischen Kern von information literacy" -- Standards der Informationskompetenz - neue Entwicklungen in Deutschland, Großbritannien und den USA -- Referenzrahmen Informationskompetenz für alle Bildungsebenen -- Empirische Erfassung von Informationskompetenz -- Informationskompetenz in ethischer Perspektive -- Informationskompetenz und Rhetorik Informationspsychologische Grundlagen der Informationskompetenz -- Mobil, vernetzt, always on" - Lebenswelten junger Menschen und Informationskompetenzförderung der Bibliotheken -- Big Data - neue Herausforderungen für Informationskompetenz und Bildung -- Resource Discovery Systeme -- Suchmaschinenkompetenz als Baustein der Informationskompetenz -- Förderung von Informationskompetenz durch E-Learning: Wie viel Technik soll es sein? -- Vorschule und Schule -- Informationskompetenz bei Kindergartenkindern
Förderung von Informationskompetenz als Aufgabe von Schule -- Das kooperative Schulungsmodell zur Förderung von Informationskompetenz - am Beispiel der Teaching Library Vorarlberg -- Die Förderung der Informationskompetenz zusammen mit Lehrkräften -- ASK UB - Evaluation und Weiterentwicklung eines Schulungskonzeptes für Informationskompetenz -- Hochschulstudium -- Förderung wissenschaftlicher Informationskompetenz in deutschen Hochschulen -- Informationskompetenz an Massenuniversitäten - Wherever, Whenever! Bibliotheken an Hochschulen in Bayern: Bestandsaufnahme und Modell Ansbach -- Informationskompetenz und forschungsorientiertes Studium - ein Beitrag aus der Hochschuldidaktik -- Grenzverschiebungen: Wissenschaftliches Schreiben, Schreibwerkstätten und Informationskompetenz Förderung von Informationskompetenz in der KIT-Bibliothek unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Ausbildung von Lernkompetenz als zentraler Komponente von Informationskompetenz -- Fit für die Bachelorarbeit - wie Institutsbibliotheken Blended Learning einsetzen können -- Informationskompetenz institutionell verankern am Beispiel der Universitätsbibliothek Bern -- Wissenschaft und Forschung -- Informationskompetenz im Wissenschaftssystem Informationsservices auf Augenhöhe - So können Bibliotheken den Forschungsprozess proaktiv unterstützen DOI: 10.1515/9783110403367
- LCSH
- Information literacy
Information literacy / Study and teaching
- Subject
- Information literacy
Information literacy / Study and teaching
-
Matusiak, K.K.: Image and multimedia resources in an academic environment : a qualitative study of students' experiences and literacy practices (2013)
0.20
0.1990292 = product of:
0.35825256 = sum of:
0.008208414 = weight(_text_:information in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008208414 = score(doc=1002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
0.060488097 = weight(_text_:resource in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060488097 = score(doc=1002,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19147538 = queryWeight, product of:
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.31590536 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
0.12957469 = weight(_text_:literacy in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12957469 = score(doc=1002,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.54984415 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
0.048772074 = weight(_text_:study in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048772074 = score(doc=1002,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.37332577 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
0.11120928 = weight(_text_:teaching in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11120928 = score(doc=1002,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.5093896 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Abstract
- The digital environment provides an abundance of images and multimedia and offers a new potential for using resources in multiple modes of representation for teaching and learning. This article reports the findings of a case study that investigated the use of image and multimedia resources in an undergraduate classroom. The study assumed a contextual approach and focused on different class contexts and students' literacy practices. The class, which took place in a resource-rich, multimodal environment, was perceived by students as a positive learning experience. The distribution of resources and their role in teaching and learning varied and depended on the context of use. The findings indicate that images fulfilled important descriptive and mnemonic functions when students were introduced to new concepts, but their role was limited in practices that required students to analyze and synthesize knowledge.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1577-1589
-
Creanor, L.; Durndell, H.; Primrose, C.: Library and study skills using hypertext : the TILT experience (1996)
0.17
0.17380443 = product of:
0.31284797 = sum of:
0.009576483 = weight(_text_:information in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009576483 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
0.07056945 = weight(_text_:resource in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07056945 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19147538 = queryWeight, product of:
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.36855626 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
0.04645927 = weight(_text_:study in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04645927 = score(doc=401,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.3556224 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
0.15890351 = weight(_text_:teaching in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15890351 = score(doc=401,freq=6.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.72785103 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
0.027339289 = product of:
0.054678578 = sum of:
0.054678578 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054678578 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16854395 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.32441732 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Abstract
- When the Glasgow University Teaching with Independent Learning Technologies (TILT) project began in Jan 1993, its main aim was to demonstrate how IT could be successfully incorporated into university teaching within a single institution. 4 years later, TILT has demonstrated its value in many areas, particularly in library and study skills. More than 130 institutions both in the UK and overseas are now using the 5 hypertext information skills modules as a resource in their undergraduate teaching, and detailed evaluations of their effectiveness have been carried out. Discusses the development and evaluation of the courseware and details its transformation from Guide through Toolbook to WWW
-
Boon, S.; Johnston, B.; Webber, S.: ¬A phenomenographic study of English faculty's conceptions of information literacy (2007)
0.17
0.17195767 = product of:
0.38690475 = sum of:
0.023695651 = weight(_text_:information in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023695651 = score(doc=829,freq=24.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
0.26449323 = weight(_text_:literacy in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26449323 = score(doc=829,freq=24.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
1.1223648 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
0.033185188 = weight(_text_:study in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033185188 = score(doc=829,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.25401598 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
0.065530695 = weight(_text_:teaching in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065530695 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.30016068 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this research is to identify UK English academics' conceptions of information literacy and compare those conceptions with current information literacy standards and frameworks. Design/methodology/approach - Three year AHRB-funded study involving 80 academics interviewed throughout the UK and using the phenomenographic research method to discover variation in experience leading towards identification of qualitatively different conceptions of information literacy. Conceptions are then reviewed in light of previous research and current librarian-generated frameworks and standards. Findings - The findings identify UK English academics' conceptions of information literacy and show them to be both similar to and significantly different from conceptions described in previous research and librarian-generated frameworks and standards. Research limitations/implications - The research focuses on creating a conceptual snapshot-in-time for the 20 English academics taking part. The research implies that disciplinary differences in conception of information literacy are significant and suggests further research to assess disciplinary conceptual differences. Practical implications - Librarians working with English faculty on information literacy need to be aware of differences in conception between themselves and academics to work effectively. The paper also highlights the significance of information literacy in English faculty's teaching and research practices and this relevance suggests that information literacy should be integrated into course and curriculum design. Originality/value - The paper fills a major gap in literature on information literacy by focussing on conceptions of lecturers, thereby counterbalancing the abundance of work produced by librarians. The paper illustrates the complexity of English academics' conceptions of information literacy and informs academics' use and understanding of information literacy.
-
Lloyd, A.: Chasing Frankenstein's monster : information literacy in the black box society (2019)
0.17
0.16614787 = product of:
0.3738327 = sum of:
0.024625242 = weight(_text_:information in 5476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024625242 = score(doc=5476,freq=18.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 5476, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5476)
0.24241205 = weight(_text_:literacy in 5476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24241205 = score(doc=5476,freq=14.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
1.0286642 = fieldWeight in 5476, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5476)
0.02815857 = weight(_text_:study in 5476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02815857 = score(doc=5476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.21553972 = fieldWeight in 5476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5476)
0.07863684 = weight(_text_:teaching in 5476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07863684 = score(doc=5476,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.36019284 = fieldWeight in 5476, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5476)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce and examine algorithmic culture and consider the implications of algorithms for information literacy practice. The questions for information literacy scholars and educators are how can one understand the impact of algorithms on agency and performativity, and how can one address and plan for it in their educational and instructional practices? Design/methodology/approach In this study, algorithmic culture and implications for information literacy are conceptualised from a sociocultural perspective. Findings To understand the multiplicity and entanglement of algorithmic culture in everyday lives requires information literacy practice that encourages deeper examination of the relationship among the epistemic views, practical usages and performative consequences of algorithmic culture. Without trying to conflate the role of the information sciences, this approach opens new avenues of research, teaching and more focused attention on information literacy as a sustainable practice. Originality/value The concept of algorithmic culture is introduced and explored in relation to information literacy and its literacies.
- Theme
- Information
-
Lux, C.; Sühl-Strohmenger, W.: Teaching Library in Deutschland : Vermittlung von Informationsund Medienkompetenz als Kernaufgabe für Öffentliche und Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken (2004)
0.17
0.16562288 = product of:
0.29812115 = sum of:
0.015477933 = weight(_text_:information in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015477933 = score(doc=1427,freq=16.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.1057973 = weight(_text_:literacy in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1057973 = score(doc=1427,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.4489459 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.037544757 = weight(_text_:study in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037544757 = score(doc=1427,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.2873863 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.12841341 = weight(_text_:teaching in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12841341 = score(doc=1427,freq=12.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.5881924 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.010887727 = product of:
0.021775454 = sum of:
0.021775454 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021775454 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14070424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Abstract
- "Teaching Library" - dies ist nicht nur der Titel dieses Buches, sondern vor allem auch eine selbstbewusste Behauptung in einem Land, in dem die Politik die Bibliotheken als Partner des Lernens noch nicht entdeckt hat, in dem die kommunalen Gremien in Zeiten des Sparens die Ausgaben für Bibliotheken als angeblich freiwillige Leistungen in dem Feld der Kultur neben Museen und Theatern munter kürzen. Dabei belegen die internationalen Studien (PISA, TIMSS etc.) zur Leistungsfähigkeit von Bildungssystemen bereits jetzt schon erhebliche Defizite des deutschen Bildungswesens, insbesondere hinsichtlich der Schlüsselqualifikationen, die unter "Literacy" gefasst werden. Als notwendige Antwort auf dieses Defizit empfehlen die Autoren dieses Buches die viel pointiertere Einbindung der gesamten Bibliotheken in Deutschland in unser Bildungssystem, um sowohl die Unentbehrlichkeit zu unterstreichen, als auch Synergien mit anderen Bildungsträgern zu nutzen. Das vorliegende Buch zeigt eindrucksvoll die erstaunliche Vielfalt der Initiativen und den Einfallsreichtum der Bibliothekare in dieser Hinsicht.
- Classification
- AN 76400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksbenutzung / Auskunft, Information
- Date
- 22. 2.2008 14:17:00
- LCSH
- Information literacy / Study and teaching / Germany
Information retrieval / Study and teaching / Germany
- RSWK
- Bibliothekswesen / Information / Medienkompetenz (ÖVK)
- RVK
- AN 76400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Bibliotheksbenutzung / Auskunft, Information
- Subject
- Bibliothekswesen / Information / Medienkompetenz (ÖVK)
Information literacy / Study and teaching / Germany
Information retrieval / Study and teaching / Germany
-
Detlor, B.; Julien, H.; Willson, R.; Serenko, A.; Lavallee, M.: Learning outcomes of information literacy instruction at business schools (2011)
0.17
0.16552193 = product of:
0.37242436 = sum of:
0.0232169 = weight(_text_:information in 4356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0232169 = score(doc=4356,freq=16.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4356, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4356)
0.24241205 = weight(_text_:literacy in 4356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24241205 = score(doc=4356,freq=14.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
1.0286642 = fieldWeight in 4356, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4356)
0.02815857 = weight(_text_:study in 4356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02815857 = score(doc=4356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.21553972 = fieldWeight in 4356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4356)
0.07863684 = weight(_text_:teaching in 4356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07863684 = score(doc=4356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.36019284 = fieldWeight in 4356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4356)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- This paper reports results from an exploratory study investigating the factors affecting student learning outcomes of information literacy instruction (ILI) given at business schools. Specifically, the potential influence of student demographics, learning environment factors, and information literacy program components on behavioral, psychological, and benefit outcomes were examined. In total, 79 interviews with library administrators, librarians, teaching faculty, and students were conducted at three business schools with varying ILI emphases and characteristics. During these interviews, participants discussed students' ILI experiences and the outcomes arising from those experiences. Data collection also involved application of a standardized information literacy testing instrument that measures student information literacy competency. Analysis yielded the generation of a new holistic theoretical model based on information literacy and educational assessment theories. The model identifies potential salient factors of the learning environment, information literacy program components, and student demographics that may affect ILI student learning outcomes. Recommendations for practice and implications for future research are also made.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.3, S.572-585
-
Riedling, A.M.: Information literacy : what does it look like in the school library media center? (2004)
0.16
0.16460136 = product of:
0.37035304 = sum of:
0.02163107 = weight(_text_:information in 1435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02163107 = score(doc=1435,freq=20.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.30666938 = fieldWeight in 1435, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1435)
0.17072965 = weight(_text_:literacy in 1435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17072965 = score(doc=1435,freq=10.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.7244834 = fieldWeight in 1435, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1435)
0.046930946 = weight(_text_:study in 1435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046930946 = score(doc=1435,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.35923287 = fieldWeight in 1435, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1435)
0.13106139 = weight(_text_:teaching in 1435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13106139 = score(doc=1435,freq=8.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.60032135 = fieldWeight in 1435, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1435)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- The overall goal of this textbook is to teach library media specialists what information literacy looks like. While readers may find it difficult to envision what information literacy actually looks like in action, Riedling makes an admirable attempt to do so in this relatively slim manual. In fact, the annotated endnote references for each chapter seem sometimes as long as the chapters themselves. The book is organized into six extensively researched chapters. The author includes boxed insets of pertinent questions, information, statistics, and sample formats for various applications. If you carry away nothing else, the following statistic should change how you teach technology: citing a survey commissioned by the OCLC, of the 1050 college students representing 18- to 24-year-olds throughout the nation, "only 4 percent of college students question the information they encounter" on the Internet. The information about how this all meshes together into a coherent whole that leads to learning and also aligns to district, state, and national requirement makes this book a worthwhile addition.
- LCSH
- Information literacy / Study and teaching
Information retrieval / Study and teaching
- Subject
- Information literacy / Study and teaching
Information retrieval / Study and teaching
-
Hicks, A.: Moving beyond the descriptive : the grounded theory of mitigating risk and the theorisation of information literacy (2020)
0.16
0.16306327 = product of:
0.36689237 = sum of:
0.024663214 = weight(_text_:information in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024663214 = score(doc=5651,freq=26.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.34965688 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
0.253233 = weight(_text_:literacy in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.253233 = score(doc=5651,freq=22.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
1.0745825 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
0.023465473 = weight(_text_:study in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023465473 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.17961644 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
0.065530695 = weight(_text_:teaching in 5651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065530695 = score(doc=5651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.30016068 = fieldWeight in 5651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5651)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose Information literacy has been consistently undertheorised. The purpose of this paper is to contribute in the ongoing theorisation of information literacy by exploring the meaning and implications of the emergent grounded theory of mitigating risk for information literacy research and practice. Design/methodology/approach The grounded theory was produced through a qualitative study that was framed by practice theory and the theoretical constructs of cognitive authority and affordance, and employed constructivist grounded theory, semi-structured interviews and photo-elicitation methods to explore the information literacy practices of language-learners overseas. Findings This paper provides a theoretically rich exploration of language-learner information literacy practices while further identifying the importance of time, affect and information creation within information literacy research and practice as well as the need for the continued theorisation of information literacy concepts. Research limitations/implications The paper's constructivist grounded theorisation of information literacy remains localised and contextualised rather than generalisable. Practical implications The paper raises questions and points of reflection that may be used to inform the continued development of information literacy instruction and teaching practices. Originality/value This paper contributes to an increasingly sophisticated theoretical conceptualisation of information literacy as well as forming a basis for ongoing theoretical development in the field.
- Theme
- Information
-
Andretta, S.: Information literacy : a practitioner's guide (2004)
0.15
0.14972457 = product of:
0.22458686 = sum of:
0.016042031 = weight(_text_:information in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016042031 = score(doc=589,freq=44.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.2274321 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
44.0 = termFreq=44.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
0.025203373 = weight(_text_:resource in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025203373 = score(doc=589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19147538 = queryWeight, product of:
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.13162723 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
0.101005025 = weight(_text_:literacy in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.101005025 = score(doc=589,freq=14.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.42861012 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
0.026235199 = weight(_text_:study in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026235199 = score(doc=589,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.20081729 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
0.0463372 = weight(_text_:teaching in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0463372 = score(doc=589,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.21224566 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
0.0097640315 = product of:
0.019528063 = sum of:
0.019528063 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019528063 = score(doc=589,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16854395 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.11586332 = fieldWeight in 589, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=589)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(6/9)
- Abstract
- This book explores two main models of Information Literacy or IL: the SCONUL (Society of College, National and University Libraries) Seven Pillars of Information Skills and the IL competencies identified by the ALA (American Library Association). Practical examples for the development of IL skills identified by these models are illustrated using printed and web-based resources. The process of integrating IL provision within a programme of study is outlined to illustrate two strategies underpinning this integration at generic-skills level, the 'plug & play' approach, and at subject-specific level, the 'research skills approach'. A range of diagnostic and assessment methods, to monitor the iterative process of IL skills development, are also included.
- Content
- Key Features - Explores practical applications of two major IL models - Explores strategies to integrate IL provision in a multi-disciplinary environment - Offers a range of learning and evaluation strategies appropriate for, as well as resources associated with, IL provision - Provides a gateway to generic and subject specific IL resources by complementing the publication with web-based access to an online collection relevant to Information Research and a range of web-based tutorials (existing and customised) to develop IL skills for online environments Readership Information practitioners operating in teaching as well as library support roles who are interested, or required, to develop IL. Academics in management positions responsible for the implementation of learning and teaching strategies. Contents Introduction From user education to IL: national and international perspectives - technological advancements and access to information; changes in higher education institutions: the student-centred learning approach; information practitioner as facilitator ('Sage an the stage vs. Guide an the side') IL models - SCONUUs Seven Pillars of Information Skills principles of progressions and iteration; ALA/ALRC: information competency standards for higher education (principle of self-directed learning); comparative analysis of the two models Practical applications of IL - provision through the level of competence: the plug & play approach (assessing IL skills); provision through integration by subject: the research skills approach; IL and pedagogy (studentcentred learning; transferability of skills) Challenges - IL and the 'what do I do now?' Syndrome; design and resource implications of IL provision
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 59(2006) H.4, S.74-76 (M. Katzmayr): "Information Literacy (IL) bzw. Informationskompetenz ist in aller Munde, wird sie doch als Schlüsselqualifikation angesehen, um an der so genannten Informationsgesellschaft teilzuhaben. Susie Andretta, Dozentin für Informationsmanagement an der London Metropolitan University, hat nun einen praxisorientierten Leitfaden zur IL vorgelegt, worin zwei Aspekte im Vordergrund stehen: einerseits die Vermittlung der IL in der universitären Lehre, womit andererseits auch ein erfolgreiches lebenslanges Lernen nach Verlassen der Universität ermöglicht werden soll. Das Buch beginnt mit einer theoretischen Einführung. Dort ist zu lesen, dass sich die Vermittlung von IL aus Kursen zur Bibliotheksbenutzung entwickelt habe - doch während letztere traditionell den effektiven Umgang mit Bibliotheksressourcen vermitteln und somit auf die Bibliothek beschränkt seien, beinhalte IL auch Herangehensweisen zur Lösung komplexer Problemstellungen. Drei prominente IL-Konzeptionen folgender Organisationen werden anschließend ausführlicher vorgestellt und verglichen: die der US-amerikanischen "Association of Colleges and Research Libraries" (ACRL), des "Australian and New Zealand Institute for information Literacy" (ANZIIL) und der britischen "Society of College, National and University Libraries" (SCONUL). In allen drei besteht IL zumindest aus dem Wahrnehmen eines Informationsbedarfes, Methoden zum Erhalt dieser Information und schließlich ihrer Bewertung, um die Fragen zu beantworten, die zum Informationsbedarf geführt haben. Alle drei gehen über die rein technologische Kompetenz (IT-Kompetenz) hinaus und umfassen u. a. Medien-, Bibliotheks-, und Recherchekompetenzen, um nur einige zu nennen. Allerdings gehen zwei dieser Konzeptionen noch wesentlich weiter - so fordert die ANZIIL von einer informationskompetenten Person u.a. folgende Fähigkeit: "the information-literate person applies prior and new information to construct new concepts or create new understandings" (S. 157), der Lernzielkatalog der SCONUL beinhaltet: "The ability to synthesise and build upon existing information, contributing to the creation of new knowledge" (S. 162).
Was hier auffällt, ist der äußerst weit reichende inhaltliche Anspruch dieser Sichtweise von IL. Inwieweit dadurch eine Abgrenzung zum Themenund Lehrgebiet des "wissenschaftlichen Arbeitens" bzw. zu den Charakteristika umfassender Bildung überhaupt noch sinnvoll möglich ist, wird von der Autorin leider nicht behandelt. Interessant ist der Stellenwert der Bibliotheken in der Lehre der IL: In allen drei Konzeptionen wird eine Kooperation zwischen Bibliothek und Wissenschaftsbetrieb empfohlen, ja erfolge die Vermittlung von IL idealiter im jeweiligen Fachstudium durch die problemlösungsorientierte Bearbeitung spezifischer Fragestellungen. So gesehen könne also nicht von einem Monopol der Bibliotheken ausgegangen werden, ihre Rolle sei vielmehr mit dem Motto "information literacy is an issue for the library but not of the library" (S. 53) angemessen umschrieben. In Großbritannien gehe dabei die Initiative meist von den Bibliotheken aus, in den USA und Australien eher vom Wissenschaftsbetrieb. In beiden Fällen funktioniere diese Partnerschaft aber nicht immer reibungslos. Die Beweggründe von Bibliotheken, sich hierzu engagieren, werden von der Autorin jedoch keiner tiefer gehenden Analyse unterzogen. Dies wurde vielleicht nicht völlig unbeabsichtigt unterlassen, da daran nämlich eine - im vorliegenden Werk ausgeblendete - grundsätzliche und weit verbreitete Kritik an der IL anknüpfen könnte. Ein Blick in die relevante Literatur zeigt nämlich, dass Bibliothekarinnen nicht nur hehre Motive zugeschrieben werden, wenn sie sich am IL-Hype beteiligen bzw. ihn vorantreiben. Neben Erfahrungen mit der dürftigen Informationskompetenz vieler Studierender werden ihnen auch ganz andere, pragmatischere Beweggründe zugedacht'. Ein Beispiel: Die zunehmende institutionelle Marginalisierung von Bibliotheken und ihren Mitarbeiterinnen im Universitätsbetrieb mag eine kreative Vorwärtsverteidigung unter dem Deckmantel der IL als zweckmäßig erscheinen lassen' - überspitzt formuliert: IL als Konstrukt oder zumindest willkommene Gelegenheit, um den Bibliotheken auch weiterhin eine zentrale Rolle an den Universitäten zu sichern. Zum Glück gelingt es Andretta, anhand der relevanten Literatur und eigener Erfahrungen als Dozentin plausibel zu argumentieren, dass der Mangel vieler Studierender an Informationskompetenz tatsächlich eklatant und somit ein Handlungsbedarf gegeben ist. Welche Motive die Bibliotheken hier sonst noch haben mögen, kann so gesehen ruhig im Dunkeln bleiben.
- LCSH
- Information literacy / Examinations / Study guides
Information science / Examinations / Study guides
- Series
- Chandos Information Professional Series
- Subject
- Information literacy / Examinations / Study guides
Information science / Examinations / Study guides
- Theme
- Information
-
Walton, G.; Hepworth, M.: ¬A longitudinal study of changes in learners' cognitive states during and following an information literacy teaching intervention (2011)
0.15
0.14574784 = product of:
0.2623461 = sum of:
0.017304856 = weight(_text_:information in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017304856 = score(doc=4543,freq=20.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.2453355 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
0.1057973 = weight(_text_:literacy in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1057973 = score(doc=4543,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.4489459 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
0.018772379 = weight(_text_:study in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018772379 = score(doc=4543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.14369315 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
0.104849115 = weight(_text_:teaching in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104849115 = score(doc=4543,freq=8.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.4802571 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
0.01562245 = product of:
0.0312449 = sum of:
0.0312449 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0312449 = score(doc=4543,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16854395 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.18538132 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper seeks to identify the changes in cognition associated with becoming information-literate, specifically, in relation to the evaluation of information. Additionally, it puts forward a model for a teaching and learning intervention that engages the learner and leads to higher order information literacy (IL) thinking. From a theoretical perspective the research integrates ideas from the fields of IL, teaching and learning, e-learning and information behaviour (IB). Design/methodology/approach - Three interventions were designed to develop the information literacies of first-year undergraduates studying Sport and Exercise at Staffordshire University, to teach and test IL. Interventions took a blended approach and combined face-to-face and online social network learning (OSNL) - also referred to as social media learning (SML) - and focused on one aspect of information literacy: the ability to evaluate source material. Data were captured via interviews, focus groups and from the online discussion that was analysed thematically and categorised using task, behaviour, cognitive states, affective states, cognitive states and knowledge. This helped to evaluate the efficacy of the interventions and provided data for further analysis. This paper focuses on the cognitive data and their transitions during the interventions and, in particular, among those respondents who experienced OSNL. Findings - The changing cognitive states, associated with IL learning were modelled and made evident key cognitive states and transitions. This is represented in the paper in diagrammatic and mathematical notation. The findings indicate the complexity of the information behaviours associated with IL including the cognitive, behavioural, cognitive and affective elements. Although the cognitive transitions are the focus of this paper, an insight is also given into an IL intervention that fosters the capability to interact critically and reflectively with information. The pedagogy that underpins these changes is indicated. The intervention, which incorporated OSNL, proved the most successful. Research limitations/implications - Undergraduate students' IB can be changed and IL developed. Additional long-term data would have indicated whether this intervention had a lasting impact on the undergraduates. Practical implications - IL practitioners should consider incorporating OSNL and assessment in their interventions. Incorporating discussion, reflection and peer-to-peer assessment is likely to lead to deeper learning when teaching IL. Originality/value - The research adds detail to the understanding of the cognitive, behavioural, affective and cognitive states associated with IL and makes explicit how these may change, as the learner becomes information-literate.
-
Herring, J.E.: Teaching information skills in schools (1996)
0.13
0.12998994 = product of:
0.29247737 = sum of:
0.020106426 = weight(_text_:information in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020106426 = score(doc=795,freq=12.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
0.05631714 = weight(_text_:study in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05631714 = score(doc=795,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.43107945 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
0.19262011 = weight(_text_:teaching in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19262011 = score(doc=795,freq=12.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.8822886 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
0.023433676 = product of:
0.046867352 = sum of:
0.046867352 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046867352 = score(doc=795,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16854395 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.278072 = fieldWeight in 795, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=795)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Combines theory and practice of library user training into a framework for teaching information skills in school libraries. The main focus is on in secondary schools (ages 11-18) but teachers and librarians in upper primary and secondary schools and in further education colleges can bebefit from the work. The PLUS model proposed covers: purpose; location; use; and self evaluation. The intention is not to suggest that the PLUS model is radically different from other but to provide an integrated framework to be used both by pupils and those who support them
- LCSH
- Information technology / Study and teaching (Secondary) / Great Britain
Information resources / Study and teaching (Secondary) / Great Britain
- Subject
- Information technology / Study and teaching (Secondary) / Great Britain
Information resources / Study and teaching (Secondary) / Great Britain
-
Macpherson, K.: ¬An information processing model of undergraduate electronic database information retrieval (2004)
0.11
0.11419924 = product of:
0.2569483 = sum of:
0.025957283 = weight(_text_:information in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025957283 = score(doc=2207,freq=20.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.36800325 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
0.09162314 = weight(_text_:literacy in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09162314 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.38879853 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
0.02815857 = weight(_text_:study in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02815857 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.21553972 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
0.11120928 = weight(_text_:teaching in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11120928 = score(doc=2207,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.5093896 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- In this paper, it is suggested that a number of theoretical and practical perspectives an information literacy can be obtained through the examination of tenets of cognitive psychology. One aspect of cognitive psychology information processing theory is applied to the development of a two-stage model of the information retrieval process. This model of information retrieval has utility along two dimensions: firstly, in the conceptualization of the information retrieval process; and secondly, in the development of teaching strategies informed by such a model. The efficacy of this model was tested in a large two-phase experimental study at the University of Canberra, Australia. Statistically significant results support the effectiveness of the concept-based teaching of information retrieval and the utility of the model as an explanation of the cognitive underpinnings of information retrieval.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.4, S.333-347
-
Williams, D.; Coles, L.: Evidence-based practice in teaching : an information perspective (2007)
0.11
0.1120157 = product of:
0.25203532 = sum of:
0.0232169 = weight(_text_:information in 848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0232169 = score(doc=848,freq=36.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 848, product of:
6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
36.0 = termFreq=36.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=848)
0.12216418 = weight(_text_:literacy in 848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12216418 = score(doc=848,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.51839805 = fieldWeight in 848, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=848)
0.032514717 = weight(_text_:study in 848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032514717 = score(doc=848,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.24888384 = fieldWeight in 848, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=848)
0.07413952 = weight(_text_:teaching in 848) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07413952 = score(doc=848,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.33959305 = fieldWeight in 848, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=848)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this research is to explore UK teachers' use of research-based information, with a particular focus on issues relating to access to information in schools, information literacy, and the role of the school librarian and school library services. Design/methodology/approach - The study adopts a mixed methodology. In-depth qualitative data gathered through vignette interviews (n=28), group exercises (four groups of between three and five teachers) and a discussion forum were supplemented by quantitative data gathered through surveys of teachers (n=312), head teachers (n=78), school librarians (n=78) and school library services (n=26). Findings - Teachers' professional use of research information reflects a preference for predigested information and informal sources. Although professional bodies and government departments promote the use of research by teachers and provide a range of customised web sites for information, lack of ready local access to information and lack of time were cited as major barriers to the use of research information. Teachers also revealed uncertainties and lack of confidence in their own ability to find and evaluate such information. The findings suggest scope for more targeted provision by school librarians of both information and skills to support the professional development of teachers. However, this raises issues of priorities and resources, and needs to be seen in the context of a wider change in ethos supported by senior management. The study also raises questions about teachers' own experiences and approaches to the use of information in professional learning, and how this might impact on the provision of support for their pupils and the potential for collaborative working between librarians and teachers. Research limitations/implications - The qualitative aspects of the study provided a rich source of data from teachers with varying levels of experience and involvement with the use of research information. However, a low response to the teacher questionnaire survey (10.9 per cent, overall, 312 teachers) resulted in a bias towards more research-oriented teachers in that particular data set. While the data from research-oriented teachers do appear to triangulate, it is difficult to generalise to other teachers. Therefore teacher survey data have been treated with some caution and drawn on only to aid further understanding of the issues raised in interviews and group exercises. Originality/value - In focusing attention on teachers' information behaviour and information literacy, this paper provides a new perspective on the issues affecting the lack of uptake of research evidence within the teaching profession, contributes to the literature on information behaviour and information literacy in professional contexts, and contributes to the understanding of factors which may have a bearing on the development of student information literacy in schools.
-
Ercegovac, Z.: LEArning portfolio for accessing engineering information for engineers (1999)
0.11
0.10841317 = product of:
0.24392962 = sum of:
0.022686856 = weight(_text_:information in 6717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022686856 = score(doc=6717,freq=22.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.32163754 = fieldWeight in 6717, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6717)
0.13224661 = weight(_text_:literacy in 6717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13224661 = score(doc=6717,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.5611824 = fieldWeight in 6717, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6717)
0.023465473 = weight(_text_:study in 6717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023465473 = score(doc=6717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.17961644 = fieldWeight in 6717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6717)
0.065530695 = weight(_text_:teaching in 6717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065530695 = score(doc=6717,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.30016068 = fieldWeight in 6717, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6717)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- This article describes design considerations of two interrelated programs that together make Learning Portfolio (LEAP) prototype system for accessing engineering information for engineers. The two programs are: Engineering Information Sources and Access (EISA), implemented as a Web-based self-learning prototype system; and Information Sources that Every Engineer should Know; ISEEK adds embedded instructional layer, representative queries, and constitutes the core layer of engineering sources for a beginner engineering student. Of analytical significance, the project has (1) defined indicators of information literacy (IL) for engineering students; (2) developed IL questionnaire to test engineering students' IL skills; (3) developed information literacy profile of engineering students under study; (4) assessed existing information resources, tools and search techniques. Of practical significance, we have: (5) applied students' responses in the design of EISA; (6) implemented the EISA information literacy program for engineers; (7) developed a series of hypertext-based tutorials each dealing with a specific IL issue; and (8) proposed set of the four design principles (i.e., understanding the user; active learning; conceptual model of teaching; and modularity). Finally, the article identifies and discusses future work
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Information Today
- Series
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
- Source
- Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
-
Pattuelli, M.C.: Modeling a domain ontology for cultural heritage resources : a user-centered approach (2011)
0.10
0.099924564 = product of:
0.17986421 = sum of:
0.009673708 = weight(_text_:information in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009673708 = score(doc=4194,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
0.050406747 = weight(_text_:resource in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050406747 = score(doc=4194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19147538 = queryWeight, product of:
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.26325446 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
0.040643394 = weight(_text_:study in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040643394 = score(doc=4194,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.3111048 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
0.065530695 = weight(_text_:teaching in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065530695 = score(doc=4194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.30016068 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
0.013609659 = product of:
0.027219318 = sum of:
0.027219318 = weight(_text_:22 in 4194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027219318 = score(doc=4194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14070424 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4194)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Abstract
- The use of primary source materials is recognized as key to supporting history and social studies education. The extensive digitization of library, museum, and other cultural heritage collections represents an important teaching resource. Yet, searching and selecting digital primary sources appropriate for classroom use can be difficult and time-consuming. This study investigates the design requirements and the potential usefulness of a domain-specific ontology to facilitate access to, and use of, a collection of digital primary source materials developed by the Library of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. During a three-phase study, an ontology model was designed and evaluated with the involvement of social studies teachers. The findings revealed that the design of the ontology was appropriate to support the information needs of the teachers and was perceived as a potentially useful tool to enhance collection access. The primary contribution of this study is the introduction of an approach to ontology development that is user-centered and designed to facilitate access to digital cultural heritage materials. Such an approach should be considered on a case-by-case basis in relation to the size of the ontology being built, the nature of the knowledge domain, and the type of end users targeted.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:11:34
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.314-342
-
Moreira dos Santos Macula, B.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification in the organization of knowledge : representing the concept of ethics (2023)
0.10
0.09976075 = product of:
0.22446167 = sum of:
0.050406747 = weight(_text_:resource in 1128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050406747 = score(doc=1128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19147538 = queryWeight, product of:
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.26325446 = fieldWeight in 1128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.765415 = idf(docFreq=1023, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1128)
0.023465473 = weight(_text_:study in 1128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023465473 = score(doc=1128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.17961644 = fieldWeight in 1128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1128)
0.13106139 = weight(_text_:teaching in 1128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13106139 = score(doc=1128,freq=8.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.60032135 = fieldWeight in 1128, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1128)
0.019528063 = product of:
0.039056126 = sum of:
0.039056126 = weight(_text_:evaluation in 1128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039056126 = score(doc=1128,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16854395 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.23172665 = fieldWeight in 1128, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1947007 = idf(docFreq=1811, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1128)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- Training in knowledge organization (KO) involves an understanding of theories for the construction, maintenance, use, and evaluation of logical documentary languages. Teaching these KO concepts in LIS programs are related basically to accessing documents and retrieving their intellectual content. This study focuses on access to documents and exploring the ethical theme in all its dimensions as applied to the teaching of an undergraduate discipline as part of a Bachelor of Library Science degree offered at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG). As a methodology, a Project-based Pedagogy strategy is used in the teaching of a discipline called "Classification Systems: UDC" for students to classify a documentary resource from a collection on ethics. The teaching of bibliographic classification requires students to learn how to use the mechanisms available to form a notation as well as to use a syntax schema (tables) appropriately. Students also learn to determine a place for the document in the collection, considering the knowledge represented in the collection as a whole. Altogether, such a practice can help students to understand the theory underlying a classification system. The results show that the students were able to understand the basic concepts of knowledge organization. The students were also able to observe that the elements of the different tables of a classification tool are essential mechanisms for the organization of knowledge in other contexts, especially for specific purposes.
-
Baro, E.E.; Seimode, F.D.: a case study : Information literacy programmes in university libraries (2013)
0.10
0.09616378 = product of:
0.2163685 = sum of:
0.009673708 = weight(_text_:information in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009673708 = score(doc=5067,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07053547 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
0.10797891 = weight(_text_:literacy in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10797891 = score(doc=5067,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23565711 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.4582035 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.8650045 = idf(docFreq=340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
0.033185188 = weight(_text_:study in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033185188 = score(doc=5067,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13064213 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.25401598 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2514048 = idf(docFreq=4653, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
0.065530695 = weight(_text_:teaching in 5067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.065530695 = score(doc=5067,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21831872 = queryWeight, product of:
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.04018021 = queryNorm
0.30016068 = fieldWeight in 5067, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.433489 = idf(docFreq=524, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5067)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Abstract
- This is a case study on information literacy (IL) practices in university libraries in Nigeria, the UK and the US. An online questionnaire was used for data collection. University libraries in the UK and US provide IL training in all the areas mentioned compared to university libraries in Nigeria. There are differences between university libraries in UK, US and Nigeria in IL training delivery methods. However, barriers such as lack of facilities, lack of understanding of IL, students' nonchalant attitude towards attending IL sessions, and low acceptance of the online approach were identified as factors militating against librarians' efforts when advocating and providing IL training in the university libraries in Nigeria, while barriers such as lack of time allotted for teaching IL skills, students tendency to be apathetic and bored, and a lack of understanding of what IL is were mentioned by the libraries studied in the UK and US. To have effective IL training programmes, university authorities in developing countries should see the need to provide the necessary facilities such as computers with stable Internet access in university libraries, regular power supplies, and training of librarians on IT. Most of all, librarians should collaborate with other stakeholders in their institutions to ensure an IL policy formulation and implementation in their institutions.
