Search (50 results, page 1 of 3)

0.23674397 = product of:
  0.39457327 = sum of:
    0.15109384 = weight(_text_:comparative in 315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15109384 = score(doc=315,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.64474034 = fieldWeight in 315, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=315)
    0.07314736 = weight(_text_:general in 315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07314736 = score(doc=315,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.44860157 = fieldWeight in 315, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=315)
    0.17033209 = product of:
      0.34066418 = sum of:
        0.34066418 = weight(_text_:syntax in 315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34066418 = score(doc=315,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.24882086 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.258808 = idf(docFreq=229, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03975531 = queryNorm
            1.3691143 = fieldWeight in 315, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              6.258808 = idf(docFreq=229, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

BK

17.52 / Syntax

Classification

17.52 / Syntax

Footnote

Originaltitel: Aspects of the theory of syntax (1965)

LCSH

Grammar, Comparative and general / Syntax

RSWK

Syntax / Grammatik (DNB)

Subject

Syntax / Grammatik (DNB)
Grammar, Comparative and general / Syntax

0.11957378 = product of:
  0.19928962 = sum of:
    0.07631392 = weight(_text_:comparative in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07631392 = score(doc=4543,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.32564306 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
    0.036944993 = weight(_text_:general in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036944993 = score(doc=4543,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.226578 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
    0.0860307 = product of:
      0.1720614 = sum of:
        0.1720614 = weight(_text_:syntax in 4543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1720614 = score(doc=4543,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.24882086 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.258808 = idf(docFreq=229, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03975531 = queryNorm
            0.69150716 = fieldWeight in 4543, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.258808 = idf(docFreq=229, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4543)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Abstract

The objective of the work is to explore the potency of integrating structural and citation information with effective syntax-semantic text-based analysis for scientific plagiarism detection. One of the major limitations in today's plagiarism checkers is their sole dependence on text-based detection, where they ignore the citation and structural information. Further, the text-based detection approaches that they employ usually fail to trace out intelligent manipulations. In the proposed work, a plagiarism detection system is presented that employs the effective coupling of various modules, namely, logical structure classifications and citation parsing, two-stage candidate document selections, syntax-semantic-based exhaustive passage level analysis with plagiarism analysis using structural and citation information. Further, a new plagiarism score, namely, weighted overall similarity index is proposed, opposed to the general plagiarism scores. The proposed approach is evaluated on the data set created by Alzahrani et al. (2011),1 which contains scientific publications imposed with various plagiarism complexities. Comparison of the final system results is done against a potential baseline approach. The proposed approach exhibits considerable improvement over the comparative baseline, and hence reflects the potency of syntax-semantic text-based analysis with structural and citation information.

0.10872855 = product of:
  0.27182138 = sum of:
    0.18315339 = weight(_text_:comparative in 8702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18315339 = score(doc=8702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.7815433 = fieldWeight in 8702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8702)
    0.08866799 = weight(_text_:general in 8702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08866799 = score(doc=8702,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.54378724 = fieldWeight in 8702, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8702)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Footnote

Vortrag, IFLA General Conference and Council Meeting, Barcelona, 1993 (IFLA-100-CAT-E)

0.10616078 = product of:
  0.26540196 = sum of:
    0.21367896 = weight(_text_:comparative in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21367896 = score(doc=3876,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.9118005 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
    0.051722992 = weight(_text_:general in 3876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051722992 = score(doc=3876,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.3172092 = fieldWeight in 3876, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3876)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Comparative study of knowledge management (KM) promises to lead to more effective knowledge use in all cultural environments. This pilot study compares KM priorities, needs, tools, and administrative structure components in large Chinese and American universities. General KM theory and literature related to KM in higher education are analyzed to develop the four components of the study. Comparative differences in KM practice at large Chinese and American universities are analyzed for each component. A correlation matrix reveals statistically significant co-variation among all but one of the study components. Four conclusions related to comparative KM and suggestions for future research are presented.

0.10111733 = product of:
  0.2527933 = sum of:
    0.21584833 = weight(_text_:comparative in 3540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21584833 = score(doc=3540,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.9210576 = fieldWeight in 3540, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3540)
    0.036944993 = weight(_text_:general in 3540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036944993 = score(doc=3540,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.226578 = fieldWeight in 3540, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3540)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Opinion mining refers to the use of natural language processing, text analysis, and computational linguistics to identify and extract subjective information in textual material. Opinion mining, also known as sentiment analysis, has received a lot of attention in recent times, as it provides a number of tools to analyze public opinion on a number of different topics. Comparative opinion mining is a subfield of opinion mining which deals with identifying and extracting information that is expressed in a comparative form (e.g., "paper X is better than the Y"). Comparative opinion mining plays a very important role when one tries to evaluate something because it provides a reference point for the comparison. This paper provides a review of the area of comparative opinion mining. It is the first review that cover specifically this topic as all previous reviews dealt mostly with general opinion mining. This survey covers comparative opinion mining from two different angles. One from the perspective of techniques and the other from the perspective of comparative opinion elements. It also incorporates preprocessing tools as well as data set that were used by past researchers that can be useful to future researchers in the field of comparative opinion mining.

0.09753007 = product of:
  0.1625501 = sum of:
    0.08633933 = weight(_text_:comparative in 3670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08633933 = score(doc=3670,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.36842304 = fieldWeight in 3670, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3670)
    0.04179849 = weight(_text_:general in 3670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04179849 = score(doc=3670,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.25634375 = fieldWeight in 3670, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3670)
    0.03441228 = product of:
      0.06882456 = sum of:
        0.06882456 = weight(_text_:syntax in 3670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06882456 = score(doc=3670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24882086 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.258808 = idf(docFreq=229, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03975531 = queryNorm
            0.27660286 = fieldWeight in 3670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.258808 = idf(docFreq=229, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Content

Inhalt: Argument hierarchy and other factors determining argument realization / Dieter Wunderlich - Mismatches in semantic-role hierarchies and the dimensions of role semantics / Beatrice Primus - Thematic roles : universal, particular, and idiosyncratic aspects / Manfred Bierwisch - Experiencer constructions in Daghestanian languages / Bernard Comrie and Helma van den Berg - Clause-level vs. predicate-level linking / Balthasar Bickel - From meaning to syntax semantic roles and beyond / Walter Bisang - Meaning, form and function in basic case roles / Georg Bossong - Semantic macroroles and language processing / Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. - Thematic roles as event structure relations / Maria Mercedes Pinango - Generalised semantic roles and syntactic templates: Anew framework for language comprehension / Ina Bornkessel and Matthias Schlesewsky

LCSH

Grammar, Comparative and general

Subject

Grammar, Comparative and general

0.08969648 = product of:
  0.2242412 = sum of:
    0.15109384 = weight(_text_:comparative in 4253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15109384 = score(doc=4253,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.64474034 = fieldWeight in 4253, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4253)
    0.07314736 = weight(_text_:general in 4253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07314736 = score(doc=4253,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.44860157 = fieldWeight in 4253, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4253)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

LCSH

Grammar, Comparative and general / Morphology

Subject

Grammar, Comparative and general / Morphology

0.0822797 = product of:
  0.20569924 = sum of:
    0.12210226 = weight(_text_:comparative in 1738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12210226 = score(doc=1738,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 1738, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1738)
    0.08359698 = weight(_text_:general in 1738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08359698 = score(doc=1738,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.5126875 = fieldWeight in 1738, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1738)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Updated and expanded volume offering in-depth evaluations of 77 general encyclopedias, including electronic products; and reviews of over 800 subject-specific and 44 foreign language encyclopedias. Each encyclopedia evaluated is graded according to its coverage, accuracy, recency and clarity

0.081126735 = product of:
  0.20281683 = sum of:
    0.15109384 = weight(_text_:comparative in 1751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15109384 = score(doc=1751,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.64474034 = fieldWeight in 1751, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1751)
    0.051722992 = weight(_text_:general in 1751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051722992 = score(doc=1751,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.3172092 = fieldWeight in 1751, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1751)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

In this article, our interest is focused on the automatic learning of Boolean queries in information retrieval systems (IRSs) by means of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms considering the classic performance criteria, precision and recall. We present a comparative study of four well-known, general-purpose, multi-objective evolutionary algorithms to learn Boolean queries in IRSs. These evolutionary algorithms are the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II), the first version of the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA), the second version of SPEA (SPEA2), and the Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA).

0.0724857 = product of:
  0.18121424 = sum of:
    0.12210226 = weight(_text_:comparative in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12210226 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
    0.05911199 = weight(_text_:general in 1465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05911199 = score(doc=1465,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.3625248 = fieldWeight in 1465, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1465)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

The authors analyse the specifics and results of lexical processing of scientific and technical texts for the purposes of information retrieval thesauri compilation and terminology unification. General and particular methods are identified for terms' meanings representation in thesauri and terminological systems. Procedures are proposed for concurrent solution of information retrieval tasks in descriptor systems and of terminology unification problems

0.0724857 = product of:
  0.18121424 = sum of:
    0.12210226 = weight(_text_:comparative in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12210226 = score(doc=1603,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
    0.05911199 = weight(_text_:general in 1603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05911199 = score(doc=1603,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.3625248 = fieldWeight in 1603, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1603)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely - order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features - simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specifity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes

0.0724857 = product of:
  0.18121424 = sum of:
    0.12210226 = weight(_text_:comparative in 4850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12210226 = score(doc=4850,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 4850, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4850)
    0.05911199 = weight(_text_:general in 4850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05911199 = score(doc=4850,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.3625248 = fieldWeight in 4850, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4850)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Reports on: commercially available CD-ROM titles for 1985-91; plots the comparative growth of CD-ROM and online titles for 1984-92; database type trends (indexes, source and reference) for 1987-91; subject distribution (social services 43%, science and technology 35%, arts and humanities 8% and general 13%); library and information science databases (including catalogues); CD-ROM hardware platform trends for 1990-91; CD-ROM update frequency trends; and overall, medium price trends for 1987-91. The medium price for CD-ROM databases has declined from $ 1273 in 1987 to $ 702 in 1991

0.0724857 = product of:
  0.18121424 = sum of:
    0.12210226 = weight(_text_:comparative in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12210226 = score(doc=5435,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.5210289 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
    0.05911199 = weight(_text_:general in 5435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05911199 = score(doc=5435,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.3625248 = fieldWeight in 5435, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5435)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Reports the methodology of a training seminar in which comparative analysis of pre-coordinated and post-coordinated procedures was examined. Evaluates training seminars as teaching activities which allow teachers to overcome the problem of a high number of students in a class

Imprint

Zaragoza : Libreria General

0.0720625 = product of:
  0.120104164 = sum of:
    0.05341974 = weight(_text_:comparative in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05341974 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.22795013 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
    0.03657368 = weight(_text_:general in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03657368 = score(doc=3431,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.22430079 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
    0.030110745 = product of:
      0.06022149 = sum of:
        0.06022149 = weight(_text_:syntax in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06022149 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24882086 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.258808 = idf(docFreq=229, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03975531 = queryNorm
            0.2420275 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.258808 = idf(docFreq=229, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)

Content

Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: HENRIKSEN, T.: A linguistic description model for indexing languages; MONTGOMERY, C.A.: Toward a natural language communications inferface; SPANG-HANSSEN, H.: Are classification systems similar to natural languages; LANCASTER, F.W.: Vocabulary control for on-line interactive retrieval systems: requirements and possible approaches; DAHLBERG, I.: On the theory of the concept; GROLIER, E. de: In search of an objective basis for the organization of knowledge; BELING, G.: Towards a set theoretical foundation of classification; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Fundamenbtal of subject indexing languages; CAVALCANTI, C.R.: Universal integrated media for information processing; DESAI, A.R.: Theory of integrative levels, general systems theory, theory of classification, theory of wvolution, and theory of pattern recognition (abstract); GOPINATH, M.A. u. S. SEETHARAMA: Interdisciplinary subjects and their classification; IMMROTH, J.P.: A lexical essay toward the developments of the theory of indexes to classification schemes; KOCHEN, M.: Organising knowledge for coping with needs; KURBAKOV, K.I. u. V.G. BOLDOV: Problem of compatibility of information classification systems and some probable methods of its solution; MAIXNER, V.: Classification systems and retrieval languages; MEINCKE, P.P.M. u. P. ATHERTON: Knowledge space: a conceptual basis for the organization of knowledge; NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Absolute syntax and structure of an indexing and switching language; NEILL, S.D. MacLuhan and classification; RICHMOND, P.A. u. N.J. WILLIAMSON: Three dimensional physical models in classification; SVENONIUS, E.: Translation between hierarchical structures: an exercise in abstract classification; BORKO, H.: Changing roles of and developments in automated classification; DREESE, M.J.: Comparison of document retrieval using UDC - notation given by UDC - expert with catch-words taken from title by clerk, stored in computer memory; GARFIELD, E., MALIN, M.V. u. H. SMALL: A system for automatic classification of scientific literature (abstract); HEAPS, H.S. u. K.V. LEuNG: Automatic document classification based on a theory of relevance; HOYLE, W.G.: A measure of overlap in classification systems; KLESZCZ: Method of information retrieval and subject index compilation for abstracting periodicals with the use of a thesaurus enlarged with machine part classification; SCHNEIDER, J.H.: AUTOCLASS: a computer system for facilitating the creation and updating of hierarchical classifications; JANOS, J.: Information systems with automated indexing based an the analysis of texts; RIGBY, M.: Advances since Elsinore in the use of automated equipment for vocabulary, classification schedule and information or data control on a universal scale; TOMAN, J.: Trend of the future: two ordering system used together? TOMAN, J. u. G.A. Lloyd: Introduction to the Subject-field Reference Code (SRC) or Broad System of Ordering (BSO) for UNISIST purposes; AUSTIN, D.: Differences between library classifications and machine-based subject retrieval systems; some inferences drawn from research in Britain, 1963-1973; JACHOWICZ, R.L.: Application of classification as basis for the formulation of thesaurus; KOFNOVEC, L. u. D. SIMANDL: Quantitative structure of world scientific and technical literature and its use for optimizing general classifications; RAJAN, T.N. u. B. GUHA: A comparative study of subject heading structuring according to POPSI and PRECIS; ROLLING, L.N.: Computer management of multi-lingual thesauri; SOKOLOV, A.V.: Compound indexing languages; VILENSKAYA, S.C.: Systems approach as a principle of thesaurus building on the basis of the subject headings language; WAHLIN, E.: Special classification systems used together with a common reference system; the AR-complex; WERSIG, G.: Experiences in compatibility research in documentary languages; WOLFF-TERROINE, M.: A macrothesaurus. Why? How? SAMUELSON, K.: Information ordering in worldwise communications; SHEPHERD, M. u. C. WATTERS: Hierarchical retrieval from structured text

0.06953721 = product of:
  0.17384301 = sum of:
    0.12950902 = weight(_text_:comparative in 3429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12950902 = score(doc=3429,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.5526346 = fieldWeight in 3429, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3429)
    0.044333994 = weight(_text_:general in 3429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044333994 = score(doc=3429,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.27189362 = fieldWeight in 3429, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3429)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Collaborative information-seeking (CIS) tasks, such as holiday planning, academic research, medical/health information seeking, cannot be tackled without making sense of the task and the encountered information together with collaborators, that is, collaborative sensemaking. In CIS, collaborative sensemaking is an important but understudied aspect. A thorough understanding of collaborative sensemaking behavior in CIS tasks is essential to develop tools to support collaborative sensemaking activities in CIS. In this article, we investigate the general patterns and differences in collaborative sensemaking behavior in travel planning and topic research tasks using the data from 2 observational user studies. The results show the common stages of the collaborative sensemaking process and the differences in users' collaborative sensemaking strategies and activities between the 2 tasks. This comparative study enhances our understanding of the collaborative sensemaking process in CIS tasks and the differences in user's sensemaking behavior according to tasks, and describes implications for supporting collaborative sensemaking behavior in CIS tasks.

0.06406891 = product of:
  0.16017228 = sum of:
    0.10792416 = weight(_text_:comparative in 1121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10792416 = score(doc=1121,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.4605288 = fieldWeight in 1121, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1121)
    0.052248113 = weight(_text_:general in 1121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052248113 = score(doc=1121,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.32042968 = fieldWeight in 1121, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1121)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

The Korean Decimal Classification (KDC) and Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) are national classification systems of Korea and Japan. They have been used widely in many libraries of each country and maintained successfully by each national library associations of Korean Library Association (KLA) and Japan Library Association (JLA). This study compares the general characteristics of these two national classification systems using their latest editions of KDC 6 and NDC 10. After reviewing the former research, their origins, general history and development, and usages were briefly compared. Various aspects including classification by discipline, not by subjects, decimal expansion of the classes using pure notations of Arabic, hierarchical structure, and mnemonics quality are checked for both systems. Results of the comparative analyses of major auxiliary tables, main classes and 100 divisions of schedules of two systems are suggested one by one with special regards to Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). The analyses focus on the differences between both systems as well as the characteristics which reflect the local situations of both countries. It suggests some ideas for future developments and research based on the results of their strengths and weaknesses.

0.06342499 = product of:
  0.15856247 = sum of:
    0.10683948 = weight(_text_:comparative in 3232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10683948 = score(doc=3232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.45590025 = fieldWeight in 3232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3232)
    0.051722992 = weight(_text_:general in 3232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051722992 = score(doc=3232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.3172092 = fieldWeight in 3232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3232)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Presents a comparative study of systematic classification methods and of subject-word classification methods, with regard to general utilization, advantages and disadvantages, electronic computer usage, trends and proposals. Analyzes a number of objective possibilities of treating the subject: accuracy requirements, fast search and retrieval requirements, and cost saving

0.06342499 = product of:
  0.15856247 = sum of:
    0.10683948 = weight(_text_:comparative in 6102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10683948 = score(doc=6102,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.45590025 = fieldWeight in 6102, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6102)
    0.051722992 = weight(_text_:general in 6102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051722992 = score(doc=6102,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.3172092 = fieldWeight in 6102, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6102)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Content

Vortrag anlässlich der 72ND IFLA General Conference and Council, 20-24 August 2006, Seoul, Korea

0.061709773 = product of:
  0.15427443 = sum of:
    0.091576695 = weight(_text_:comparative in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.091576695 = score(doc=490,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.39077166 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
    0.06269774 = weight(_text_:general in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06269774 = score(doc=490,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.38451564 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Reports results of a comparative analysis of choice and form of main entry in the monograph cataloguing of the LoC and that of the British Library and the national libraries of Canada and Australia in 1982 and 1989, examining the extent to which LoC practice and that of the other agencies was consistent and, when it was not, the apparent reasons for the inconsistency. The overall aim of the project was to investigate the achievement of UBC and the implicit idea that bibliographic records created by the national bibliographic agency (NBA) of one country should be acceptable, without modification, the NBAs of other countries. Part 1 provides a general introduction and background to the study, which set out to measure the degree of consistency achieved by the LoC and Association of Bibliographic Agencies of Australia, Britain, Canada and the USA (ABACUS) NBAs is assigning main entries to books catalogued, along with an analysis of broad patterns and patterns affecting the choice of main entry

Issue

Pt.1: Introduction, general observations, and choice of entry.

0.05794766 = product of:
  0.14486915 = sum of:
    0.10792416 = weight(_text_:comparative in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10792416 = score(doc=5640,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.23434836 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.4605288 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.8947687 = idf(docFreq=330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
    0.036944993 = weight(_text_:general in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036944993 = score(doc=5640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1630564 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03975531 = queryNorm
        0.226578 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1015 = idf(docFreq=1988, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Introduction 1. The Early Years of Library of Congress Collecting and Classifying (1801-1901) 1.1 Setting the Stage. The American Century 1.2 Expanding General Collections: The Window on Europe 1.3 A New Classification for the Library of Congress 2. Breaking Ground for Law: Classifications for the Discipline and its Literature 2.1 The Early Proposals for a Law Book Classification 2.2 Expanding Law Collections: The Second Window on Europe 2.3 The Law Classification Theater and the Players 2.4 Structure and Scope of the Anticipated Class K. Jurisdictionality 3. The Code vs. the Court report: Model Schemes for Civil and Common Law 3.1 The Washington Dialogues: Law for Law 3.2 In Search for Common Ground 3.2.1 The Committee Dialogues: Joint in Dissent 3.3 The Anglo-American Law: Model KF (Law of the United States) 3.4 The Law of the American Indians 4. The Civil law: Model KK (Law of Germany) 4.1 The Historic German Split and History of Law 4.2 KF and KK Comparatively 4.2.1 Private Law: Mixed Aspects 4.2.2 Constitutional and Administrative Law: Mixed Messages 4.3 KKA (Law of East Germany): Classification by Comparison 4.4 German States and Territories 5. The Regional Law: Model KJ (Law of Europe). Regionalism 5.1 The Resulting New Hierarchy 5.2 European Legal History: A Comparative Discipline 5.3 KJC Regional Comparative and Uniform Law 5.4 KJE Regional Organization and Integration 6. Regional Classification: KL-KWX ("The Rest of the World") Conclusion