Search (4147 results, page 1 of 208)

  1. Lynch, C.A.; Preston, C.M.: Describing and classifying networked information resources (1992) 0.18
    0.18438217 = product of:
      0.36876434 = sum of:
        0.36876434 = sum of:
          0.25850198 = weight(_text_:policy in 2974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.25850198 = score(doc=2974,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.9478471 = fieldWeight in 2974, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2974)
          0.11026237 = weight(_text_:22 in 2974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11026237 = score(doc=2974,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2974, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2974)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Electronic networking: research, applications, and policy. 2(1992) no.1, S.10-22
  2. Bawden, D.: Information policy or knowledge policy? (1997) 0.17
    0.17373002 = product of:
      0.34746003 = sum of:
        0.34746003 = sum of:
          0.29922023 = weight(_text_:policy in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.29922023 = score(doc=683,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              1.0971484 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
          0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 683) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048239786 = score(doc=683,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 683, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=683)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the types of information that are generally involved in information policy, from data, through information with varying degrees of structure, to knowledge and perhaps to wisdom. Information with lower levels of structure and raw data may be managed by systems, technical and administrative, and by procedures. Knowledge can only be managed by policies. There is, therefore, a close link between information policy formulation and evaluation and the emerging discipline of knowledge management. Concludes that information policy is: inevitably complex, not concerned with technical solutions; and dependent upon an appreciation of the meaning and significance of knowledge in its proper context
    Source
    Understanding information policy. Proceedings of a British Library funded Information Policy Unit Workshop, Cumberland Lodge, UK, 22-24 July 1996. Ed. by Ian Rowlands
  3. Understanding information policy : Proceedings of a British Library funded Information Policy Unit Workshop, Cumberland Lodge, UK, 22-24 July 1996 (1997) 0.17
    0.1720726 = product of:
      0.3441452 = sum of:
        0.3441452 = sum of:
          0.289014 = weight(_text_:policy in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.289014 = score(doc=684,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              1.0597253 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
          0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055131186 = score(doc=684,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Papers presented at a British Library funded workshop, organized by the Information Policy Unit, City University, Department of Information Science, which brought together delegates from research communities and from the 'real world' of policy making at corporate, national, and international levels to discuss information policy
  4. Rowlands, I.: Understanding information policy : concepts, frameworks and research tools (1996) 0.16
    0.15776558 = product of:
      0.31553116 = sum of:
        0.31553116 = sum of:
          0.27418277 = weight(_text_:policy in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.27418277 = score(doc=4339,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              1.0053437 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
          0.041348387 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041348387 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper considers the need for a more systematic and critical approach to the academic study of information policy at national and international level. It reviews the complex, multifaceted nature of large-scale information policy problems and considers some of the main sources of confusion in the journal literature. It is argued that while information policy has been largey technology-driven, the consideration of information policy has, for historical reasons, typically been discipline-bounded. This has contributed to a fragmentation of research effort and a lack of consensus on the most appropriate home discipline for the study of information policy. In the search for a more critical scientific understanding of information policy issues, a brief review is made of the strenghts, limitations and applicability of the broad theoretical and methodological approaches which have been adopted, often implicitly, by writers reporting in the library and information science literature. The paper concludes with a consideration of some desirable characteristics for the design of information policy studies
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.13-25
  5. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.13
    0.12925497 = sum of:
      0.08078585 = product of:
        0.24235754 = sum of:
          0.24235754 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24235754 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43122733 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.048469122 = product of:
        0.096938245 = sum of:
          0.096938245 = weight(_text_:policy in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.096938245 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.35544267 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  6. Woodhouse, S.: 'Dewey adapts to the world, the worlds adapt Dewey' : Strategic development of the classification into the millennium (1997) 0.12
    0.118959844 = product of:
      0.23791969 = sum of:
        0.23791969 = sum of:
          0.1827885 = weight(_text_:policy in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1827885 = score(doc=1810,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.67022914 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
          0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 1810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055131186 = score(doc=1810,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1810, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1810)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the Dewey Classification Editorial Policy Committee, Spring meeting 1997 which aimed to agree policies for the development of the classification over the next decade and put together a strategic plan to implement it. Details: themes for the future, the concept of edition, editorial policy on the relative index, manual, schedule development, and ways to determine areas for revision
    Date
    7. 8.1998 19:22:16
  7. Johnson, P.: Selecting electronic resources : developing a local decision-making matrix (1996) 0.12
    0.118959844 = product of:
      0.23791969 = sum of:
        0.23791969 = sum of:
          0.1827885 = weight(_text_:policy in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1827885 = score(doc=5549,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.67022914 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
          0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055131186 = score(doc=5549,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5549, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5549)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Selecting electronic resources requires both a policy statement to guide collection development and management and procedures to manage the process of selecting and handling these resources. Both policy and procedures must be crafted in response to local priorities, resources, limitations, and organizational structure. This paper examines issues that should be addressed when developing local procedures. Particular emphasis is given to preparing a mechanism to guide selection between various media and modes of information delivery-is explored.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.9-24
  8. Wang, J.; Halffman, W.; Zhang, Y.H.: Sorting out journals : the proliferation of journal lists in China (2023) 0.11
    0.107545376 = product of:
      0.21509075 = sum of:
        0.21509075 = sum of:
          0.18063375 = weight(_text_:policy in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18063375 = score(doc=1055,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.6623283 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
          0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 1055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03445699 = score(doc=1055,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1055, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1055)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Journal lists are instruments to categorize, compare, and assess research and scholarly publications. Our study investigates the remarkable proliferation of such journal lists in China, analyses their underlying values, quality criteria and ranking principles, and specifies how concerns specific to the Chinese research policy and publishing system inform these lists. Discouraged lists of "bad journals" reflect concerns over inferior research publications, but also the involved drain on public resources. Endorsed lists of "good journals" are based on criteria valued in research policy, reflecting the distinctive administrative logic of state-led Chinese research and publishing policy, ascribing worth to scientific journals for its specific national and institutional needs. In this regard, the criteria used for journal list construction are contextual and reflect the challenges of public resource allocation in a market-led publication system. Chinese journal lists therefore reflect research policy changes, such as a shift away from output-dominated research evaluation, the specific concerns about research misconduct, and balancing national research needs against international standards, resulting in distinctly Chinese quality criteria. However, contrasting concerns and inaccuracies lead to contradictions in the "qualify" and "disqualify" binary logic and demonstrate inherent tensions and limitations in journal lists as policy tools.
    Date
    22. 9.2023 16:39:23
  9. Moore, N.: Neo-liberal or dirigiste? : Policies for an information society (1997) 0.10
    0.10462518 = product of:
      0.20925036 = sum of:
        0.20925036 = sum of:
          0.16790198 = weight(_text_:policy in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16790198 = score(doc=685,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.6156448 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
          0.041348387 = weight(_text_:22 in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041348387 = score(doc=685,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Notes the profound changes that are affecting countries worldwide and afffecting the development of information policies intended to shape their own particular information societies. Although it is possible to identify differences in the motivating factors, nevertheless the goals of these policies are remakably similar. It is possible to identify 2 broadly divergent models. One is based on neoliberal economic philosophies and emphasizes the importance of market led solutions, exploiting private capital. The alternative model can be described as dirigiste and is based on a much greater degree of intervention by the state and so emphasizes the role of the state as a participant rather than as a facilitator. Argues that the neoliberal policy mechanism, with their emphasis on narrow economic solutions, are likely to be inadequate and the more holistic apporach of the dirigiste model seems mot appropriate
    Source
    Understanding information policy. Proceedings of a British Library funded Information Policy Unit Workshop, Cumberland Lodge, UK, 22-24 July 1996. Ed. by Ian Rowlands
  10. Koopmans, N.I.: What's your question? : The need for research information from the perspective of different user groups (2002) 0.10
    0.10462518 = product of:
      0.20925036 = sum of:
        0.20925036 = sum of:
          0.16790198 = weight(_text_:policy in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16790198 = score(doc=3612,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.6156448 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
          0.041348387 = weight(_text_:22 in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041348387 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper results of a field study into the need for research information of different user groups are presented: scientists, policy makers and policy researchers, industry and media. Main questions of semi-structured interviews were: what kind of research information users need, what kind of research information resources are used and which information resources are missing at the moment. User groups are missing for a diversity of reasons the overview of research, experts and institutes in the different scientific fields. Especially for the accessibility and transparency of the scientific world these overviews are reported to be needed. Neither Google nor any of the research institutes or policy research organisations are able to present surveys for different science fields at the moment. Giving users the possibility to search, browse and navigate through accessible and more specialised layers of research information might give answers to different user groups simultaneously.
    Date
    2. 7.2005 12:22:50
  11. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.10
    0.10408987 = product of:
      0.20817974 = sum of:
        0.20817974 = sum of:
          0.15993996 = weight(_text_:policy in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15993996 = score(doc=2509,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048239786 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
  12. Johnson, P.: Selecting electronic resources : developing a local decision-making matrix (1996) 0.10
    0.10408987 = product of:
      0.20817974 = sum of:
        0.20817974 = sum of:
          0.15993996 = weight(_text_:policy in 5542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15993996 = score(doc=5542,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 5542, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5542)
          0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 5542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048239786 = score(doc=5542,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5542, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5542)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Selecting electronic resources requires both a policy statement to guide collection development and management and procedures to manage the process of selecting and handling these resources. Both policy and procedures must be crafted in response to local priorities, resources, limitations, and organizational structure. This paper examines issues that should be addressed when developing local procedures. Particular emphasis is given to preparing a mechanism to guide selection. One possible model - a decision-making matrix to guide selection between various media and modes of information delivery - is explored.
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  13. Tsuchiya, T.; Tsuchiya, S.: Interorganizational knowledge creation and policy exercise (1996) 0.10
    0.10408987 = product of:
      0.20817974 = sum of:
        0.20817974 = sum of:
          0.15993996 = weight(_text_:policy in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15993996 = score(doc=913,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.5864505 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.048239786 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048239786 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Interorganizational knowledge creation has become a crucial factor for successful management of corporations in the environment surrounding them today. Collaboration with other organizations is indispensable for a corporation to resolve complex and Jong range issues such as customer satisfaction and sustainable development. One of the most fundamental obstacles in creating knowledge among organizations is partial or incomplete communication due to incommensurable point of view. Policy exercises can improve commensurability and facilitate inter-organizational knowledge creation by providing a shared model of the system under investigation. This paper will discuss it taking Intelligent Transportation System (TTS) Deployment Exercises as an example.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  14. Eichert, C.: ¬Die kommunale Bibliothek : der Knoten im Netz (1998) 0.10
    0.10360913 = product of:
      0.20721826 = sum of:
        0.20721826 = sum of:
          0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 6609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12925099 = score(doc=6609,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 6609, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6609)
          0.07796727 = weight(_text_:22 in 6609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07796727 = score(doc=6609,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6609, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6609)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Argues that current discussion on management of and training in networking is technocratic in nature and that it is the duty of public policy to foster personality development and present individuals with new intellectual challenges. Suggests that libraries are nodes in a communal network fulfilling the task of pathfinder, providing information, transferring knowledge, fostering cultural heritage and providing areas for communications and social integration
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:35:25
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.1, S.97-101
  15. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.10146004 = sum of:
      0.08078585 = product of:
        0.24235754 = sum of:
          0.24235754 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24235754 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43122733 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.020674193 = product of:
        0.041348387 = sum of:
          0.041348387 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041348387 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  16. Aspray, W.; Aspray, P.: Does technology really outpace policy, and does it matter? : a primer for technical experts and others (2023) 0.10
    0.098010376 = product of:
      0.19602075 = sum of:
        0.19602075 = sum of:
          0.16156375 = weight(_text_:policy in 1017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.16156375 = score(doc=1017,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.5924045 = fieldWeight in 1017, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1017)
          0.03445699 = weight(_text_:22 in 1017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03445699 = score(doc=1017,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1017, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1017)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reconsiders the outpacing argument, the belief that changes in law and other means of regulation cannot keep pace with recent changes in technology. We focus on information and communication technologies (ICTs) in and of themselves as well as applied in computer science, telecommunications, health, finance, and other applications, but our argument applies also in rapidly developing technological fields such as environmental science, materials science, and genetic engineering. First, we discuss why the outpacing argument is so closely associated with information and computing technologies. We then outline 12 arguments that support the outpacing argument, by pointing to some particular weaknesses of policy making, using the United States as the primary example. Then arguing in the opposite direction, we present 4 brief and 3 more extended criticisms of the outpacing thesis. The paper's final section responds to calls within the technical community for greater engagement of policy and ethical concerns and reviews the paper's major arguments. While the paper focuses on ICTs and policy making in the United States, our critique of the outpacing argument and our exploration of its complex character are of utility to actors in other political contexts and in other technical fields.
    Date
    22. 7.2023 13:28:28
  17. Riemer, J.J.: ¬The work of the CONSER subject and classification task force (1992) 0.09
    0.092191085 = product of:
      0.18438217 = sum of:
        0.18438217 = sum of:
          0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12925099 = score(doc=4247,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
          0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055131186 = score(doc=4247,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the value of the subject analysis fields in serial bibliographic records. Reports on the work of a recent CONSER task force on serial subject analysis. Presents finding of a detailed survey of the current subject analysis practices of all the full participants in the program, the policy issues the Task Force identified, and the recommendations it formulated. The group anticipated what the resultant supporting documentation would look like in the CONSER editing guide
    Source
    Serials librarian. 22(1992) nos.1/2, S.101-122
  18. Kirk, T.G.; Alldredge , N.S.: Coalition for networked information : the second year (1992) 0.09
    0.092191085 = product of:
      0.18438217 = sum of:
        0.18438217 = sum of:
          0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 5873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12925099 = score(doc=5873,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 5873, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5873)
          0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055131186 = score(doc=5873,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5873, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5873)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the fall meeting of the task force of the Coalition for Networked Information held from 21-22 Nov 91, in which the following topics were discussed: the current state of higher education, the development of networked information services, technological change and a costing model; 7 models of the economics of networked information; the Rights for Electronic Access to the Delivery of Information Programme; the state of and prospects for networked information resources and services in the humanities, atrs, and social sciences and public policy issues by which the NREN might be delivered
  19. Judge, A.J.N.: Envisaging the art of navigating conceptual complexity : in search of software combining artistic and conceptual insights (1995) 0.09
    0.092191085 = product of:
      0.18438217 = sum of:
        0.18438217 = sum of:
          0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12925099 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055131186 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper is concerned with approaches to the design and production of a software package to demonstrate the feasibility of enhancing comprehension, and navigating complexity. The concern her is with the design of a software package to demonstrate how the power of both 'scientific' and 'artistic' approaches may be integrated to enhance comprehension and navigation of complexity - as well as offering new forms of creativity in response to complex policy conditions, riches and subtleties of artistic insight
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.2-9
  20. Holsapple, C.W.: Knowledge management in decision making and decision support (1995) 0.09
    0.092191085 = product of:
      0.18438217 = sum of:
        0.18438217 = sum of:
          0.12925099 = weight(_text_:policy in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12925099 = score(doc=2437,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2727254 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.47392356 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.361833 = idf(docFreq=563, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
          0.055131186 = weight(_text_:22 in 2437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.055131186 = score(doc=2437,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1781178 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05086421 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2437, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2437)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge and policy. 8(1995) no.1, S.5-22

Languages

Types

  • a 3463
  • m 400
  • el 182
  • s 166
  • b 40
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 22
  • ? 9
  • n 5
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications