-
Kashyap, M.M.: Algorithms for analysis and representation of subject contents in a documentary language (1983)
0.14
0.14227965 = product of:
0.2845593 = sum of:
0.16023606 = weight(_text_:representation in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16023606 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.81334853 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.12432324 = product of:
0.18648486 = sum of:
0.093663715 = weight(_text_:29 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093663715 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.09282114 = weight(_text_:22 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09282114 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Library herald. 22(1983), S.1-29
-
Jaenecke, P.: Knowledge organization due to theory formation (1995)
0.13
0.12569842 = product of:
0.25139683 = sum of:
0.113304004 = weight(_text_:representation in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113304004 = score(doc=3751,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.57512426 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
0.13809282 = product of:
0.20713922 = sum of:
0.16030736 = weight(_text_:theory in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16030736 = score(doc=3751,freq=12.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.9003184 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
0.046831857 = weight(_text_:29 in 3751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046831857 = score(doc=3751,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3751, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3751)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Theory formation is regarded as a process of domain-internal knowledge organization. Misunderstandings about the concept 'theory' are explained. A theory is considered as a systematical representation of a domain realized by three closely related theory-forming actions: establishment of a suitable system of basic concepts, ordering of the experience or given experimental results, synthesizing of conflicting hypotheses. In this view, theory formation means an ambitious kind of knowledge representation. Its consequences are summarized and its importance for the human sciences and for society is emphasized
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 17:26:47
-
Wissensrepräsentation : [Themenheft] (1989)
0.12
0.124211535 = product of:
0.24842307 = sum of:
0.22660801 = weight(_text_:representation in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22660801 = score(doc=5667,freq=16.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
1.1502485 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
0.021815069 = product of:
0.06544521 = sum of:
0.06544521 = weight(_text_:theory in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06544521 = score(doc=5667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Enthält: LAUBSCH, J.: Towards a theory of knowledge representation; REINFRANK, M.: Formulae and models: knowledge representation in logic; FALTINGS, B.: Knowledge representation for qualitative reasoning; STOYAN, H.: Knowledge representation or programming?; FRESKA, C.: Knowledge representation and cognitive science; HÄRDER, T.: Classical data models and knowledge representation; GÖRZ, G.: Knowledge representation and natural language processing; DECKER, R.: Bibliographie zu: Knowledge representation in artificial intelligence
-
Woods, W.A.: What's important about knowledge representation? (1983)
0.12
0.11948529 = product of:
0.23897058 = sum of:
0.20029509 = weight(_text_:representation in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20029509 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
1.0166857 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
0.03867548 = product of:
0.11602644 = sum of:
0.11602644 = weight(_text_:22 in 6143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11602644 = score(doc=6143,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.77380234 = fieldWeight in 6143, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6143)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Computer. 16(1983) no.10, S.22-27
-
Krause, P.J.; Clark, D.: Representing uncertain knowledge (1993)
0.12
0.11770061 = product of:
0.23540121 = sum of:
0.169956 = weight(_text_:representation in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.169956 = score(doc=798,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.8626864 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
0.06544521 = product of:
0.19633561 = sum of:
0.19633561 = weight(_text_:theory in 798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19633561 = score(doc=798,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
1.1026603 = fieldWeight in 798, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=798)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- LCSH
- Uncertainty (Information theory)
Knowledge representation (Information theory)
- Subject
- Uncertainty (Information theory)
Knowledge representation (Information theory)
-
Way, E.C.: Knowledge representation and metaphor (oder: meaning) (1994)
0.11
0.10666951 = product of:
0.21333902 = sum of:
0.1387685 = weight(_text_:representation in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1387685 = score(doc=771,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.7043805 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.07457052 = product of:
0.111855775 = sum of:
0.06544521 = weight(_text_:theory in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06544521 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.04641057 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04641057 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Enthält folgende 9 Kapitel: The literal and the metaphoric; Views of metaphor; Knowledge representation; Representation schemes and conceptual graphs; The dynamic type hierarchy theory of metaphor; Computational approaches to metaphor; Thenature and structure of semantic hierarchies; Language games, open texture and family resemblance; Programming the dynamic type hierarchy; Subject index
- Footnote
- Bereits 1991 bei Kluwer publiziert // Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.48-49 (O. Sechser)
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.10
0.10477377 = product of:
0.13969836 = sum of:
0.06800719 = product of:
0.20402157 = sum of:
0.20402157 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20402157 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36301607 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.060088523 = weight(_text_:representation in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060088523 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.3050057 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.011602643 = product of:
0.034807928 = sum of:
0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034807928 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Ranganathan's theory of facet analysis and knowledge representation (1992)
0.10
0.1019331 = product of:
0.2038662 = sum of:
0.16023606 = weight(_text_:representation in 6133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16023606 = score(doc=6133,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.81334853 = fieldWeight in 6133, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6133)
0.043630138 = product of:
0.13089041 = sum of:
0.13089041 = weight(_text_:theory in 6133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13089041 = score(doc=6133,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.7351069 = fieldWeight in 6133, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6133)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Hjoerland, B.: Subject representation and information seeking : contributions to a theory based on the theory of knowledge (1993)
0.10
0.097098045 = product of:
0.19419609 = sum of:
0.14020655 = weight(_text_:representation in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14020655 = score(doc=7555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.71167994 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
0.05398954 = product of:
0.16196862 = sum of:
0.16196862 = weight(_text_:theory in 7555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16196862 = score(doc=7555,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.90964836 = fieldWeight in 7555, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7555)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Evans, R.; Gazdar, G.: DATR: a language for lexical knowledge representation (1996)
0.10
0.09558822 = product of:
0.19117644 = sum of:
0.16023606 = weight(_text_:representation in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16023606 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.81334853 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
0.030940382 = product of:
0.09282114 = sum of:
0.09282114 = weight(_text_:22 in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09282114 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.167-216
-
Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014)
0.09
0.094829544 = product of:
0.18965909 = sum of:
0.120177045 = weight(_text_:representation in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.120177045 = score(doc=987,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.6100114 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
0.069482036 = product of:
0.10422305 = sum of:
0.06941512 = weight(_text_:theory in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06941512 = score(doc=987,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.3898493 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034807928 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Introduction: envisioning semantic information spacesIndexing and knowledge organization -- Semantic technologies for knowledge representation -- Information retrieval and knowledge exploration -- Approaches to handle heterogeneity -- Problems with establishing semantic interoperability -- Formalization in indexing languages -- Typification of semantic relations -- Inferences in retrieval processes -- Semantic interoperability and inferences -- Remaining research questions.
- Date
- 23. 7.2017 13:49:22
- LCSH
- Knowledge representation (Information theory)
- Subject
- Knowledge representation (Information theory)
-
Gopinath, M.A.: Research in classification : a pointer towards knowledge representation (1998)
0.09
0.09407769 = product of:
0.18815538 = sum of:
0.113304004 = weight(_text_:representation in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113304004 = score(doc=2251,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.57512426 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
0.07485138 = product of:
0.11227706 = sum of:
0.06544521 = weight(_text_:theory in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06544521 = score(doc=2251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.36755344 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
0.046831857 = weight(_text_:29 in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046831857 = score(doc=2251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses the importance of classificatory language and research, and identifies major trends in classification development. Looks at ways of testing the quality of representation in classification systems, highlighting a number of basic research fronts. Notes efforts towards the development of a science of classification, beginning with those of Ranganathan. Examines the problems of keeping classification schemes up to date, and the usefulness of classification theory in knowledge organization. Also discusses categorization at generic levels; developments and objectives in the teaching and learning of classification; and future directions for classification research
- Date
- 17.11.1998 18:23:29
-
Hodgson, J.P.E.: Knowledge representation and language in AI (1991)
0.09
0.09267894 = product of:
0.18535788 = sum of:
0.1660759 = weight(_text_:representation in 1529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1660759 = score(doc=1529,freq=22.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.84299123 = fieldWeight in 1529, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1529)
0.01928198 = product of:
0.057845935 = sum of:
0.057845935 = weight(_text_:theory in 1529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057845935 = score(doc=1529,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.3248744 = fieldWeight in 1529, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1529)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The aim of this book is to highlight the relationship between knowledge representation and language in artificial intelligence, and in particular on the way in which the choice of representation influences the language used to discuss a problem - and vice versa. Opening with a discussion of knowledge representation methods, and following this with a look at reasoning methods, the author begins to make his case for the intimate relationship between language and representation. He shows how each representation method fits particularly well with some reasoning methods and less so with others, using specific languages as examples. The question of representation change, an important and complex issue about which very little is known, is addressed. Dr Hodgson gathers together recent work on problem solving, showing how, in some cases, it has been possible to use representation changes to recast problems into a language that makes them easier to solve. The author maintains throughout that the relationships that this book explores lie at the heart of the construction of large systems, examining a number of the current large AI systems from the viewpoint of representation and language to prove his point.
- LCSH
- Knowledge / representation (Information theory)
- Subject
- Knowledge / representation (Information theory)
-
Schneider, J.W.: Emerging frameworks and methods : The Fourth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), The Information School, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA, July 21-25, 2002 (2002)
0.09
0.086520806 = product of:
0.17304161 = sum of:
0.08011803 = weight(_text_:representation in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08011803 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.40667427 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
0.092923574 = product of:
0.13938536 = sum of:
0.0925535 = weight(_text_:theory in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0925535 = score(doc=1857,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.51979905 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
0.046831857 = weight(_text_:29 in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046831857 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Bericht über die Tagung und Kurzreferate zu den 18 Beiträgen (u.a. BELKIN, N.J.: A classification of interactions with information; INGWERSEN, P.: Cognitive perspectives of document representation; HJOERLAND, B.: Principia informatica: foundational theory of the concepts of information and principles of information services; TUOMINEN, K. u.a.: Discourse, cognition and reality: towards a social constructionist meta-theory for library and information science
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.231-234
-
Chen, L.; Zeng, J.; Tokuda, N.: ¬A "stereo" document representation for textual information retrieval (2006)
0.09
0.08529096 = product of:
0.17058192 = sum of:
0.15897928 = weight(_text_:representation in 5292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15897928 = score(doc=5292,freq=14.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.8069692 = fieldWeight in 5292, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5292)
0.011602643 = product of:
0.034807928 = sum of:
0.034807928 = weight(_text_:22 in 5292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034807928 = score(doc=5292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5292)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A new document representation model is presented in this paper. This model is based on the idea of representing a document by two or more pictures of the document taken from different perspectives. It is shown that by applying the stereo representation model, enhanced textual retrieval performance is achieved because the new model improves the capability of capturing individual features of the document. Experiments have been conducted on two standard corpora, TIME and ADI, using the standard term vector method and the latent semantic indexing (LSI) method based upon both the stereo representation model and the traditional representation model. Statistical t-tests on the experimental results have convincingly illustrated that these methods achieve significant improvements in retrieval performances with the stereo representation model over those with the traditional representation model.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:33:43
-
Gao, Q.: Visual knowledge representation for three-dimensional computing vision (2000)
0.08
0.083762564 = product of:
0.16752513 = sum of:
0.14020655 = weight(_text_:representation in 4673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14020655 = score(doc=4673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.71167994 = fieldWeight in 4673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4673)
0.027318582 = product of:
0.081955746 = sum of:
0.081955746 = weight(_text_:29 in 4673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081955746 = score(doc=4673,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4673, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4673)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.66, [=Suppl.29]
-
Priss, U.: Faceted information representation (2000)
0.08
0.0821951 = product of:
0.1643902 = sum of:
0.099141 = weight(_text_:representation in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099141 = score(doc=5095,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.50323373 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.065249205 = product of:
0.09787381 = sum of:
0.057264555 = weight(_text_:theory in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057264555 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.04060925 = weight(_text_:22 in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04060925 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper presents an abstract formalization of the notion of "facets". Facets are relational structures of units, relations and other facets selected for a certain purpose. Facets can be used to structure large knowledge representation systems into a hierarchical arrangement of consistent and independent subsystems (facets) that facilitate flexibility and combinations of different viewpoints or aspects. This paper describes the basic notions, facet characteristics and construction mechanisms. It then explicates the theory in an example of a faceted information retrieval system (FaIR)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 17:47:06
-
Madalli, D.P.; Balaji, B.P.; Sarangi, A.K.: Music domain analysis for building faceted ontological representation (2014)
0.08
0.0821951 = product of:
0.1643902 = sum of:
0.099141 = weight(_text_:representation in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.099141 = score(doc=1437,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.50323373 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.065249205 = product of:
0.09787381 = sum of:
0.057264555 = weight(_text_:theory in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057264555 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.32160926 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.04060925 = weight(_text_:22 in 1437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04060925 = score(doc=1437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1437)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper describes to construct faceted ontologies for domain modeling. Building upon the faceted theory of S.R. Ranganathan (1967), the paper intends to address the faceted classification approach applied to build domain ontologies. As classificatory ontologies are employed to represent the relationships of entities and objects on the web, the faceted approach helps to analyze domain representation in an effective way for modeling. Based on this perspective, an ontology of the music domain has been analyzed that would serve as a case study.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973)
0.08
0.081285715 = product of:
0.32514286 = sum of:
0.32514286 = sum of:
0.16196862 = weight(_text_:theory in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16196862 = score(doc=3339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1780563 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.90964836 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1583924 = idf(docFreq=1878, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
0.081955746 = weight(_text_:29 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.081955746 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
0.0812185 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0812185 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14994325 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 5.2005 19:52:29
- Source
- Toward a theory of librarianship. Papers in honor of J.H. Shera. Ed. by H. Rawski
-
Griffiths, T.L.; Steyvers, M.: ¬A probabilistic approach to semantic representation (2002)
0.08
0.080422625 = product of:
0.16084525 = sum of:
0.1387685 = weight(_text_:representation in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1387685 = score(doc=3671,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19700786 = queryWeight, product of:
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.7043805 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.600994 = idf(docFreq=1206, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
0.022076748 = product of:
0.066230245 = sum of:
0.066230245 = weight(_text_:29 in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066230245 = score(doc=3671,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15062225 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.042818543 = queryNorm
0.43971092 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Semantic networks produced from human data have statistical properties that cannot be easily captured by spatial representations. We explore a probabilistic approach to semantic representation that explicitly models the probability with which words occurin diffrent contexts, and hence captures the probabilistic relationships between words. We show that this representation has statistical properties consistent with the large-scale structure of semantic networks constructed by humans, and trace the origins of these properties.
- Date
- 29. 6.2015 14:55:01
29. 6.2015 16:09:05
