Search (4093 results, page 1 of 205)

  1. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.64
    0.637586 = product of:
      0.95637894 = sum of:
        0.88783973 = weight(_text_:3b in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.88783973 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47388655 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044713553 = queryNorm
            1.873528 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
        0.068539225 = product of:
          0.13707845 = sum of:
            0.13707845 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13707845 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044713553 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  2. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.18
    0.17953639 = product of:
      0.26930457 = sum of:
        0.04734465 = product of:
          0.14203395 = sum of:
            0.14203395 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14203395 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.379082 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044713553 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22195993 = weight(_text_:3b in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22195993 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47388655 = queryWeight, product of:
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044713553 = queryNorm
            0.468382 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  3. Baayen, R.H.; Lieber, H.: Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics (1997) 0.10
    0.097612046 = product of:
      0.29283613 = sum of:
        0.29283613 = sum of:
          0.20802315 = weight(_text_:semantics in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20802315 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.8483065 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
          0.08481297 = weight(_text_:22 in 3117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08481297 = score(doc=3117,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3117, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3117)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    28. 2.1999 10:48:22
  4. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.09
    0.09166114 = product of:
      0.2749834 = sum of:
        0.2749834 = sum of:
          0.23257694 = weight(_text_:semantics in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23257694 = score(doc=3283,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.9484354 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.042406484 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042406484 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 10th Metadata and Semantics Research Conference, MTSR 2016, held in Göttingen, Germany, in November 2016. The 26 full papers and 6 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 67 submissions. The papers are organized in several sessions and tracks: Digital Libraries, Information Retrieval, Linked and Social Data, Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures, Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment, Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications, European and National Projects.
  5. Boleda, G.; Evert, S.: Multiword expressions : a pain in the neck of lexical semantics (2009) 0.08
    0.08366746 = product of:
      0.25100237 = sum of:
        0.25100237 = sum of:
          0.17830555 = weight(_text_:semantics in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17830555 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.7271198 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
          0.07269683 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07269683 = score(doc=4888,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    1. 3.2013 14:56:22
  6. Bursa, O. et al.: Enriching preferences using DBpedia and Wordnet (2016) 0.08
    0.08366746 = product of:
      0.25100237 = sum of:
        0.25100237 = sum of:
          0.17830555 = weight(_text_:semantics in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17830555 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.7271198 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
          0.07269683 = weight(_text_:22 in 3276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07269683 = score(doc=3276,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3276, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3276)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  7. Brasethvik, T.: ¬A semantic modeling approach to metadata (1998) 0.07
    0.07418661 = product of:
      0.22255981 = sum of:
        0.22255981 = sum of:
          0.18015333 = weight(_text_:semantics in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18015333 = score(doc=5165,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.73465496 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
          0.042406484 = weight(_text_:22 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042406484 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    States that heterogeneous project groups today may be expected to use the mechanisms of the Web for sharing information. Metadata has been proposed as a mechanism for expressing the semantics of information and, hence, facilitate information retrieval, understanding and use. Presents an approach to sharing information which aims to use a semantic modeling language as the basis for expressing the semantics of information and designing metadata schemes. Functioning on the borderline between human and computer understandability, the modeling language would be able to express the semantics of published Web documents. Reporting on work in progress, presents the overall framework and ideas
    Date
    9. 9.2000 17:22:23
  8. Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.07
    0.06972288 = product of:
      0.20916864 = sum of:
        0.20916864 = sum of:
          0.14858796 = weight(_text_:semantics in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14858796 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.6059332 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.060580693 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060580693 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  9. Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016) 0.07
    0.06972288 = product of:
      0.20916864 = sum of:
        0.20916864 = sum of:
          0.14858796 = weight(_text_:semantics in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14858796 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.6059332 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
          0.060580693 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060580693 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  10. Celli, F. et al.: Enabling multilingual search through controlled vocabularies : the AGRIS approach (2016) 0.07
    0.06972288 = product of:
      0.20916864 = sum of:
        0.20916864 = sum of:
          0.14858796 = weight(_text_:semantics in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14858796 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.6059332 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
          0.060580693 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060580693 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  11. Marx, E. et al.: Exploring term networks for semantic search over RDF knowledge graphs (2016) 0.07
    0.06972288 = product of:
      0.20916864 = sum of:
        0.20916864 = sum of:
          0.14858796 = weight(_text_:semantics in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14858796 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.6059332 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
          0.060580693 = weight(_text_:22 in 3279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060580693 = score(doc=3279,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3279, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3279)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  12. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.07
    0.06972288 = product of:
      0.20916864 = sum of:
        0.20916864 = sum of:
          0.14858796 = weight(_text_:semantics in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14858796 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.6059332 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.060580693 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060580693 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  13. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.07
    0.06972288 = product of:
      0.20916864 = sum of:
        0.20916864 = sum of:
          0.14858796 = weight(_text_:semantics in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14858796 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.6059332 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.060580693 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060580693 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  14. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.07
    0.06972288 = product of:
      0.20916864 = sum of:
        0.20916864 = sum of:
          0.14858796 = weight(_text_:semantics in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14858796 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.6059332 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.060580693 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.060580693 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  15. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.06
    0.05946079 = product of:
      0.08919118 = sum of:
        0.071016975 = product of:
          0.21305092 = sum of:
            0.21305092 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21305092 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.379082 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044713553 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.018174207 = product of:
          0.036348414 = sum of:
            0.036348414 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036348414 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044713553 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  16. Metadata and semantics research : 7th Research Conference, MTSR 2013 Thessaloniki, Greece, November 19-22, 2013. Proceedings (2013) 0.06
    0.05902683 = product of:
      0.17708048 = sum of:
        0.17708048 = sum of:
          0.14709458 = weight(_text_:semantics in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14709458 = score(doc=1155,freq=16.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.59984326 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
                4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                  16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
          0.029985912 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029985912 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and semantics are integral to any information system and significant to the sphere of Web data. Research focusing on metadata and semantics is crucial for advancing our understanding and knowledge of metadata; and, more profoundly for being able to effectively discover, use, archive, and repurpose information. In response to this need, researchers are actively examining methods for generating, reusing, and interchanging metadata. Integrated with these developments is research on the application of computational methods, linked data, and data analytics. A growing body of work also targets conceptual and theoretical designs providing foundational frameworks for metadata and semantic applications. There is no doubt that metadata weaves its way into nearly every aspect of our information ecosystem, and there is great motivation for advancing the current state of metadata and semantics. To this end, it is vital that scholars and practitioners convene and share their work.
    The MTSR 2013 program and the contents of these proceedings show a rich diversity of research and practices, drawing on problems from metadata and semantically focused tools and technologies, linked data, cross-language semantics, ontologies, metadata models, and semantic system and metadata standards. The general session of the conference included 18 papers covering a broad spectrum of topics, proving the interdisciplinary field of metadata, and was divided into three main themes: platforms for research data sets, system architecture and data management; metadata and ontology validation, evaluation, mapping and interoperability; and content management. Metadata as a research topic is maturing, and the conference also supported the following five tracks: Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures; Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications; Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment; Big Data and Digital Libraries in Health, Science and Technology; and European and National Projects, and Project Networking. Each track had a rich selection of papers, giving broader diversity to MTSR, and enabling deeper exploration of significant topics.
    Date
    17.12.2013 12:51:22
  17. Ruge, G.: Sprache und Computer : Wortbedeutung und Termassoziation. Methoden zur automatischen semantischen Klassifikation (1995) 0.06
    0.055778306 = product of:
      0.16733491 = sum of:
        0.16733491 = sum of:
          0.11887037 = weight(_text_:semantics in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11887037 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.48474655 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
          0.04846455 = weight(_text_:22 in 1534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04846455 = score(doc=1534,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1534, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1534)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält folgende Kapitel: (1) Motivation; (2) Language philosophical foundations; (3) Structural comparison of extensions; (4) Earlier approaches towards term association; (5) Experiments; (6) Spreading-activation networks or memory models; (7) Perspective. Appendices: Heads and modifiers of 'car'. Glossary. Index. Language and computer. Word semantics and term association. Methods towards an automatic semantic classification
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.182-184 (M.T. Rolland)
  18. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.06
    0.055778306 = product of:
      0.16733491 = sum of:
        0.16733491 = sum of:
          0.11887037 = weight(_text_:semantics in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11887037 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.48474655 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.04846455 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04846455 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the effect of scheme change on the semantics in faceted classification. Two types of change are identified: ecological change and lexical change. Examples from different editions of the Colon Classification are used to illustrate change.
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
  19. Mehrotra, R.: Content-based image modeling and retrieval (1997) 0.05
    0.05414316 = product of:
      0.16242948 = sum of:
        0.16242948 = sum of:
          0.12608106 = weight(_text_:semantics in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12608106 = score(doc=761,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.51415133 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
          0.036348414 = weight(_text_:22 in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036348414 = score(doc=761,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Standard databases handle an abstracted world pertinent to specific problems in terms of alphanumeric data and respond to semantics defined by users and known to the databases. This conventional approach is not well suited to image databases, where the desired information and semantics need to be automatically or semi automatically extracted and and appropriately modelled to facilitate content based information retrieval and data manioulation. Discusses the key issues in content based image data modelling and information retrieval with particular reference to the MUlti-SEmantic Unstructured data Model (MUSEUM) system which is capable of dealing with image representatios of 3 dimensional shapes
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  20. Bittner, T.; Donnelly, M.; Winter, S.: Ontology and semantic interoperability (2006) 0.05
    0.05414316 = product of:
      0.16242948 = sum of:
        0.16242948 = sum of:
          0.12608106 = weight(_text_:semantics in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12608106 = score(doc=4820,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.24522169 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.51415133 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.484281 = idf(docFreq=498, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
          0.036348414 = weight(_text_:22 in 4820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036348414 = score(doc=4820,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15657924 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044713553 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4820, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    One of the major problems facing systems for Computer Aided Design (CAD), Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) applications today is the lack of interoperability among the various systems. When integrating software applications, substantial di culties can arise in translating information from one application to the other. In this paper, we focus on semantic di culties that arise in software integration. Applications may use di erent terminologies to describe the same domain. Even when appli-cations use the same terminology, they often associate di erent semantics with the terms. This obstructs information exchange among applications. To cir-cumvent this obstacle, we need some way of explicitly specifying the semantics for each terminology in an unambiguous fashion. Ontologies can provide such specification. It will be the task of this paper to explain what ontologies are and how they can be used to facilitate interoperability between software systems used in computer aided design, architecture engineering and construction, and geographic information processing.
    Date
    3.12.2016 18:39:22

Languages

Types

  • a 3387
  • m 395
  • el 228
  • s 173
  • b 40
  • x 38
  • i 23
  • r 23
  • n 10
  • ? 8
  • p 7
  • d 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications