Search (3692 results, page 1 of 185)

  1. Erickson, L.B.; Wisniewski, P.; Xu, H.; Carroll, J.M.; Rosson, M.B.; Perkins, D.F.: ¬The boundaries between : parental involvement in a teen's online world (2016) 0.16 
    0.15747648 = product of:
  0.31495297 = sum of:
    0.31495297 = sum of:
      0.2751809 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2751809 = score(doc=2932,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048925128 = queryNorm
          0.7261541 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
      0.039772075 = weight(_text_:22 in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039772075 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048925128 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The increasing popularity of the Internet and social media is creating new and unique challenges for parents and adolescents regarding the boundaries between parental control and adolescent autonomy in virtual spaces. Drawing on developmental psychology and Communication Privacy Management (CPM) theory, we conduct a qualitative study to examine the challenge between parental concern for adolescent online safety and teens' desire to independently regulate their own online experiences. Analysis of 12 parent-teen pairs revealed five distinct challenges: (a) increased teen autonomy and decreased parental control resulting from teens' direct and unmediated access to virtual spaces, (b) the shift in power to teens who are often more knowledgeable about online spaces and technology, (c) the use of physical boundaries by parents as a means to control virtual spaces, (d) an increase in indirect boundary control strategies such as covert monitoring, and (e) the blurring of lines in virtual spaces between parents' teens and teens' friends.
    Date
    7. 5.2016 20:05:22
  2. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.16 
    0.15623623 = product of:
  0.31247246 = sum of:
    0.31247246 = sum of:
      0.259443 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.259443 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048925128 = queryNorm
          0.6846246 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
      0.053029433 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053029433 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048925128 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Within the looming threat of the combination of computer databases with monitoring and surveillance devices, attempts to define the notion of privacy and its parameters. Considers the ethical issues posed by databases, touching on disclosure to organizations of matters such as personal taxation and financial information or security surveillance. Highlights the increasing information imbalance between persons and organizations and suggests ways to improve autonomy
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
  3. Tegenbos, J.; Nieuwenhuysen, P.: My kingdom for an agent? : Evaluation of Autonomy, an intelligent search agent for the Internet (1997) 0.13 
    0.12870409 = product of:
  0.25740817 = sum of:
    0.25740817 = product of:
      0.51481634 = sum of:
        0.51481634 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 747) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.51481634 = score(doc=747,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            1.35851 = fieldWeight in 747, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=747)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Evaluates a range of commercially available software designed to act as intelligent search agents to assist users find materials of interest on the Internet and WWW or selects for them without asking. Notes that existing search engines can be useful in finding information but their different features and sometimes unfriendly interfaces can be confusing and intelligent search agents may be able to overcome these difficulties. Singles out one package: Autonomy; from Autonomy Corporation, describes its specific features and reports results of a test conducted with the software. Concludes that, from the test results, Autonomy is not yet ready to challenge the existing Internet search engines, which in the tests performed better than Autonomy with regard to recall and precision of information retrieval. Autonomy did not give enough feedback to control the search action
    Object
    Autonomy
  4. Blakeman, K.: Intelligent agents : search tools of the future? (1997) 0.11 
    0.112342134 = product of:
  0.22468427 = sum of:
    0.22468427 = product of:
      0.44936854 = sum of:
        0.44936854 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44936854 = score(doc=765,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            1.1858047 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Reviews the Autonomy intelligent search agent for the Internet. The system searches for Internet sites based on a description of the search problem, the user selects suitable documents and the search is retained using this selection. The evaluation indicates that Autonomy is not suited to ad hac one-off searches as it takes too long compared to more traditional search engines. Search agents could be used for monitoring the WWW, or searching newspapers
    Object
    Autonomy
  5. Tsuchiya, S.: New challenges to Japanese corporations in organizational knowledge creation (1996) 0.10 
    0.097647645 = product of:
  0.19529529 = sum of:
    0.19529529 = sum of:
      0.16215189 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.16215189 = score(doc=914,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048925128 = queryNorm
          0.4278904 = fieldWeight in 914, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=914)
      0.033143397 = weight(_text_:22 in 914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033143397 = score(doc=914,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048925128 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 914, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=914)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We are in the midst of a new business revolution driven by information technology. The centerpiece of this business revolution is a new kind of product which delivers instant customer gratification in a cost-effective way. The ability to make such products will determine the successful corporations of the next century. The new business revolution demands drastic changes in organizational knowledge creation, among corporations as well as in a corporation. The key attributes of Japan's success in creation of organizational knowledge are: (1) participative management, (2) "Kaizen," and (3) "Keiretsu." In today's world of fast-moving markets and fierce competition, however, the Japan model betrays its weakness: too much time required for organizational decision making, difficulty to make revolutionary change, and obscurity of responsibility. To solve the problems, Japanese companies are decentralizing the organizations and forming virtual corporations. The changes from consensus management to responsibility management and from "keiretsu" groups to virtual corporations pose three fundamental challenges to Japanese corporations in organizational knowledge creation: (1) co-existence of firm central direction and maximum individual autonomy; (2) construction of sophisticated information networks; and (3) intercultural communication. Corporations, MITI, and universities in Japan are making concerted efforts to deal wich the winds of change that are sweeping through industry and the economy.
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  6. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.09759211 = sum of:
  0.07770607 = product of:
    0.2331182 = sum of:
      0.2331182 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.2331182 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41478777 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048925128 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.019886037 = product of:
    0.039772075 = sum of:
      0.039772075 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.039772075 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048925128 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  7. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.10 
    0.097291134 = product of:
  0.19458227 = sum of:
    0.19458227 = product of:
      0.38916454 = sum of:
        0.38916454 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38916454 = score(doc=6386,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            1.0269369 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Object
    Autonomy
  8. Robert Jr, L.P.; You, S.: Are you satisfied yet? : shared leadership, individual trust, autonomy, and satisfaction in virtual teams (2018) 0.10 
    0.097291134 = product of:
  0.19458227 = sum of:
    0.19458227 = product of:
      0.38916454 = sum of:
        0.38916454 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 4177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38916454 = score(doc=4177,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            1.0269369 = fieldWeight in 4177, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4177)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Despite the benefits associated with virtual teams, many people on these teams are unsatisfied with their experience. The goal of this study was to determine how to better facilitate satisfaction through shared leadership, individual trust, and autonomy. Specifically, in this study we sought a better understanding of the effects of shared leadership, team members' trust, and autonomy on satisfaction. We conducted a study with 163 individuals in 44 virtual teams. The results indicate that shared leadership facilitates satisfaction in virtual teams both directly and indirectly through the promotion of trust. Shared leadership moderated the relationships of individual trust and individual autonomy with satisfaction. Team-level satisfaction was a strong predictor of virtual team performance. We discuss these findings and the implications for theory and design.
  9. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Information literacy and autonomy : a cognitive view (2023) 0.09 
    0.091726966 = product of:
  0.18345393 = sum of:
    0.18345393 = product of:
      0.36690786 = sum of:
        0.36690786 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.36690786 = score(doc=980,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.96820545 = fieldWeight in 980, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=980)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Information literacy and autonomy have become key values for the image of man in a society that is increasingly shaped by digitalization and artificial intelligence. The purpose of this book is to describe abstraction, analogy, inference, plausibility and creativity as basic skills of cognitive information processing and prerequisites for autonomous informational action.
  10. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.08 
    0.08132677 = sum of:
  0.06475507 = product of:
    0.19426519 = sum of:
      0.19426519 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19426519 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41478777 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048925128 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.016571699 = product of:
    0.033143397 = sum of:
      0.033143397 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.033143397 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.048925128 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  11. Mattingley-Scott, M.: Knowledge and information (1996) 0.08 
    0.081075944 = product of:
  0.16215189 = sum of:
    0.16215189 = product of:
      0.32430378 = sum of:
        0.32430378 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 6257) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32430378 = score(doc=6257,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.8557808 = fieldWeight in 6257, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6257)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    On information - on autonomy - on sentients - on knowledge - on motivation - on communication - on metaphor - on learning - on philosophy - on humana - on information
  12. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.08 
    0.081075944 = product of:
  0.16215189 = sum of:
    0.16215189 = product of:
      0.32430378 = sum of:
        0.32430378 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32430378 = score(doc=5863,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.8557808 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
    Object
    Autonomy
  13. Rubel, A.; Castro, C.; Pham, A.: Algorithms and autonomy : the ethics of automated decision systems (2021) 0.08 
    0.081075944 = product of:
  0.16215189 = sum of:
    0.16215189 = product of:
      0.32430378 = sum of:
        0.32430378 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32430378 = score(doc=671,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.8557808 = fieldWeight in 671, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=671)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Algorithms influence every facet of modern life: criminal justice, education, housing, entertainment, elections, social media, news feeds, work... the list goes on. Delegating important decisions to machines, however, gives rise to deep moral concerns about responsibility, transparency, freedom, fairness, and democracy. Algorithms and Autonomy connects these concerns to the core human value of autonomy in the contexts of algorithmic teacher evaluation, risk assessment in criminal sentencing, predictive policing, background checks, news feeds, ride-sharing platforms, social media, and election interference. Using these case studies, the authors provide a better understanding of machine fairness and algorithmic transparency. They explain why interventions in algorithmic systems are necessary to ensure that algorithms are not used to control citizens' participation in politics and undercut democracy. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core
    Content
    Inhalt: Introduction -- Autonomy, agency, and responsibility -- What can agents reasonably endorse? -- What we informationally owe each other -- Freedom, agency, and information technology -- Epistemic paternalism and social media -- Agency laundering and information technologies -- Democratic obligations and technological threats to legitimacy -- Conclusions and caveats
  14. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08 
    0.07770607 = product of:
  0.15541214 = sum of:
    0.15541214 = product of:
      0.4662364 = sum of:
        0.4662364 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.4662364 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41478777 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  15. #220 0.07 
    0.06562058 = product of:
  0.13124116 = sum of:
    0.13124116 = product of:
      0.26248232 = sum of:
        0.26248232 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26248232 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  16. #1387 0.07 
    0.06562058 = product of:
  0.13124116 = sum of:
    0.13124116 = product of:
      0.26248232 = sum of:
        0.26248232 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26248232 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  17. #2103 0.07 
    0.06562058 = product of:
  0.13124116 = sum of:
    0.13124116 = product of:
      0.26248232 = sum of:
        0.26248232 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26248232 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17132746 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  18. Esser, M.: Was Sie über Suchmaschinen wissen sollten (1998) 0.06 
    0.06486075 = product of:
  0.1297215 = sum of:
    0.1297215 = product of:
      0.259443 = sum of:
        0.259443 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.259443 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.6846246 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Object
    Autonomy
  19. Autonomy, Inc.: Automatic classification (o.J.) 0.06 
    0.06486075 = product of:
  0.1297215 = sum of:
    0.1297215 = product of:
      0.259443 = sum of:
        0.259443 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 1666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.259443 = score(doc=1666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.6846246 = fieldWeight in 1666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  20. Pauen, M.; Welzer, H.: Autonomie : eine Verteidigung (2015) 0.06 
    0.06486075 = product of:
  0.1297215 = sum of:
    0.1297215 = product of:
      0.259443 = sum of:
        0.259443 = weight(_text_:autonomy in 3572) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.259443 = score(doc=3572,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.37895662 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.048925128 = queryNorm
            0.6846246 = fieldWeight in 3572, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.7456436 = idf(docFreq=51, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3572)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    LCSH
    Autonomy (Philosophy)
    Autonomy (Psychology)
    Subject
    Autonomy (Philosophy)
    Autonomy (Psychology)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3081
  • m 354
  • el 163
  • s 139
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications