Search (10826 results, page 1 of 542)

  1. McEathron, S.R.: ¬The cataloging of globes (1999) 0.17
    0.16888584 = product of:
      0.22518112 = sum of:
        0.13454175 = weight(_text_:description in 5321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13454175 = score(doc=5321,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.5811713 = fieldWeight in 5321, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5321)
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 5321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=5321,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 5321, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5321)
        0.03575128 = product of:
          0.07150256 = sum of:
            0.07150256 = weight(_text_:access in 5321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07150256 = score(doc=5321,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.4236785 = fieldWeight in 5321, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5321)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Globes are a unique cartographic format with special characteristics that need to be considered when providing bibliographic description and access. This article describes the challenges and characteristics of cataloging globes. It provides practical assistance in applying specific MARC 21 fields for globes. Special consideration is given to those fields that are unique to cataloging globes including: physical description areas, title, and subject access.
    Date
    26. 7.2006 10:20:20
  2. Martinez, J.M.: MPEG-7 tools for universal multimedia access (2007) 0.17
    0.16634181 = product of:
      0.22178908 = sum of:
        0.14270307 = weight(_text_:description in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14270307 = score(doc=479,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.6164252 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=479,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
        0.037919957 = product of:
          0.075839914 = sum of:
            0.075839914 = weight(_text_:access in 479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075839914 = score(doc=479,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 479, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Universal Multimedia Access (UMA) deals with seamless access to once-only-created content via any kind of terminal and any kind of network connectivity, which implies that the content should be adapted in order to fit a variety of terminal and network characteristics, as well as user preferences. The MPEG-7 standard offers some support for UMA within its section on Multimedia Description Schemes (MDS). Within the standard, several groups of tools serve this purpose. For instance, the Navigation and Access Tools provide some Description Schemes that allow the description of adapted content variations and summaries and allow for preprocessed content versions. Some support is also found in the Content Metadata Tools (Media and Usage Tools), for real-time ease in creation of online content versions and in limited support for session description, which is completed in MPEG-21.
    Date
    4. 8.2007 21:15:26
  3. Sundt, C.L.: ¬The quest for access to images : images and development (1998) 0.16
    0.15941696 = product of:
      0.31883392 = sum of:
        0.10977616 = weight(_text_:26 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10977616 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.62429106 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
        0.20905775 = sum of:
          0.10111989 = weight(_text_:access in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10111989 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.5991719 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
          0.10793786 = weight(_text_:22 in 4553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10793786 = score(doc=4553,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4553, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4553)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    26. 3.2000 20:02:09
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 22(1998), S.87-106
  4. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.15
    0.14761 = product of:
      0.19681333 = sum of:
        0.08408859 = weight(_text_:description in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08408859 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.36323205 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.03430505 = weight(_text_:26 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03430505 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.19509095 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.078419685 = sum of:
          0.0446891 = weight(_text_:access in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0446891 = score(doc=190,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.26479906 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.03373058 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03373058 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
  5. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.15
    0.14739981 = product of:
      0.29479963 = sum of:
        0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19027077 = score(doc=2830,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
        0.104528874 = sum of:
          0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050559945 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
          0.05396893 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05396893 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This case study details the evolution of descriptive practices and standards used in the Mount Holyoke College Archives and the Five College Finding Aids Access Project, discusses the relationship of Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the MARC standard in reference to archival description, and addresses the challenges and opportunities of transferring data from one metadata standard to another. The study demonstrates that greater standardization in archival description allows archivists to respond more effectively to technological change.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  6. Eden, B.; Bierman, K.J.: Knowledge access management at Lied Library : cataloging and Web site reengineering (2002) 0.15
    0.14535725 = product of:
      0.19380966 = sum of:
        0.09513538 = weight(_text_:description in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09513538 = score(doc=4797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=4797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
        0.043786198 = product of:
          0.087572396 = sum of:
            0.087572396 = weight(_text_:access in 4797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087572396 = score(doc=4797,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.51889807 = fieldWeight in 4797, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4797)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines a major departmental reorganization within UNLV's Lied Library, using the concept of knowledge access management as its basis. The establishment of the Knowledge Access Management (KAM) Division, comprising the Cataloging Department, the Systems Department, and the Web Maintenance/Digital Projects Unit, is discussed. The Cataloging Department's strategic vision is examined, along with an extensive description of the redesign of the new Lied Library's Web site.
    Date
    18.12.2005 17:43:26
  7. Danskin, A.: Linked and open data : RDA and bibliographic control (2012) 0.14
    0.14337601 = product of:
      0.19116801 = sum of:
        0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10090631 = score(doc=304,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
        0.07130171 = weight(_text_:26 in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07130171 = score(doc=304,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.40548897 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
        0.018959979 = product of:
          0.037919957 = sum of:
            0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037919957 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    RDA: Resource Description and Access is a new cataloguing standard which will replace the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, which has been widely used in libraries since 1981. RDA, like AACR2, is a content standard providing guidance and instruction on how to identify and record attributes or properties of resources which are significant for discovery. However, RDA is also an implementation of the FRBR and FRAD models. The RDA element set and vocabularies are being published on the Open Metadata Registry as linked open data. RDA provides a rich vocabulary for the description of resources and for expressing relationships between them. This paper describes what RDA offers and considers the challenges and potential of linked open data in the broader framework of bibliographic control.
    Date
    26. 6.2012 20:18:37
    26. 6.2012 20:26:43
  8. Androvic, A.: ¬1. Medzinarodny kngres CDS/ISIS, Bogota, Kolumbia 22.-26.5.1995 (1996) 0.14
    0.14113894 = product of:
      0.18818526 = sum of:
        0.09513538 = weight(_text_:description in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09513538 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
        0.038161796 = product of:
          0.07632359 = sum of:
            0.07632359 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07632359 = score(doc=5083,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The 1st International CDS/ISIS congress was organizes by the Columbian Association of CDS/ISIS users in cooperation with the Unesco regional office in Caracas, Venezuela. Reviews the programme including a detailed description of the CDS/ISIS library automation system which has 16.000 registered users and which can be run under MS-DOS, VAS/VMS, UNIX/INTEL or Windows. Written in the C++ programming language the system's main features unclude: portability; maintainability; upward compatibility; and client-server architecture implementation. Presents the text of the conference resolution
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: 1st International CDS/ISIS Congress, Bogota, Columbia 22-26 May 1995
  9. Elliot, J.D.: ¬The use of OPACs (Online Public Access Catalogues) in map libraries (1991) 0.14
    0.13933106 = product of:
      0.18577474 = sum of:
        0.09513538 = weight(_text_:description in 4240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09513538 = score(doc=4240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 4240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4240)
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 4240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=4240,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 4240, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4240)
        0.03575128 = product of:
          0.07150256 = sum of:
            0.07150256 = weight(_text_:access in 4240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07150256 = score(doc=4240,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.4236785 = fieldWeight in 4240, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4240)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Outlines plans at the British Library Map Library to provide a publicly-available online catalogue adapted from the OPACs that are being provided elsewhere in the British Library. Covers the following topics: a brief description of an OPAC; an outline of the 3 interlinked automated systems that are being devised at the British Library; automated cataloguing at the British Library Map Library; searching the Cartographic Materials online file; pitfalls and problems of coordinate searching; and towards public access; full OPAC operation
    Date
    3.10.2000 21:00:26
  10. McBride, J.L.: Faceted subject access for music through USMARC : a case for linked fields (2000) 0.13
    0.13499425 = product of:
      0.17999233 = sum of:
        0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10090631 = score(doc=5403,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=5403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
        0.037919957 = product of:
          0.075839914 = sum of:
            0.075839914 = weight(_text_:access in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075839914 = score(doc=5403,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The USMARC Format for Bibliographic Description contains three fields (045, 047, and 048) designed to facilitate subject access to music materials. The fields cover three of the main aspects of subject description for music: date of composition, form or genre, and number of instruments or voices, respectively. The codes are rarely used for subject access, because of the difficulty of coding them and because false drops would result in retrieval of bibliographic records where more than one musical work is present, a situation that occurs frequently with sound recordings. It is proposed that the values of the fields be converted to natural language and that subfield 8 be used to link all access fields in a bibliographic record for greater precision in retrieval. This proposal has implications beyond music cataloging, especially for metadata and any bibliographic records describing materials containing many works and subjects.
    Date
    27. 7.2006 19:26:55
  11. Hubert, R.: ¬The cataloguing of AV-media (1993) 0.13
    0.13275595 = product of:
      0.17700793 = sum of:
        0.09513538 = weight(_text_:description in 7197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09513538 = score(doc=7197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 7197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7197)
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 7197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=7197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 7197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7197)
        0.026984464 = product of:
          0.05396893 = sum of:
            0.05396893 = weight(_text_:22 in 7197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05396893 = score(doc=7197,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7197, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7197)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the development of cataloguing rules for audiovisual media in Austria in recent years, and the publication of ÖNORM A 2653, which encapsulates these rules, in 1991. Describes the main features of these rules; the concept of the audiovisual underlining them; their inclusion of unpublished material; the presence of content analysis in the bibliographic description, and the fact that they are aimed at computer cataloguing
    Source
    IASA journal. 1993, no.2, S.22-26
  12. Tillett, B.: Report on the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, held October 23-25, 1997 in Toronto, Canada (1998) 0.13
    0.13147756 = product of:
      0.17530343 = sum of:
        0.09513538 = weight(_text_:description in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09513538 = score(doc=3717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.41095015 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=3717,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
        0.025279973 = product of:
          0.050559945 = sum of:
            0.050559945 = weight(_text_:access in 3717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050559945 = score(doc=3717,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.29958594 = fieldWeight in 3717, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3717)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Report of the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, 23-25 Oct 1997, Toronto. This conference examined cataloguing principles and rules in light of both description and access within the framework of library catalogues. In particular it focused on bibliographic and authority records and the usability of the library catalogue
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 26(1998) no.2, S.31-55
  13. Prescott, D.F.: Early maps with or in printed publications : description and access (1999) 0.13
    0.1271876 = product of:
      0.16958345 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 5332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=5332,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 5332, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5332)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 5332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=5332,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5332, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5332)
        0.038312923 = product of:
          0.07662585 = sum of:
            0.07662585 = weight(_text_:access in 5332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07662585 = score(doc=5332,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.45403582 = fieldWeight in 5332, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5332)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article identifies the types of publications containing maps and the need for access to maps contained in them. The emphasis is on older maps; the comments are opposite for cataloging of current maps. The needs of map users are discussed, identifying the points of access that are critical to successful map retrieval. Main entry for maps is discussed. Various categories of associated map and book items are identified, and suggestions made, with USMARC examples, as to how these maps might be treated by the cataloger
    Date
    26. 7.2006 12:06:19
  14. O'Dell, A.J.: Maker metadata : problems and possibilities (2015) 0.13
    0.1271876 = product of:
      0.16958345 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=2618,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
        0.038312923 = product of:
          0.07662585 = sum of:
            0.07662585 = weight(_text_:access in 2618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07662585 = score(doc=2618,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.45403582 = fieldWeight in 2618, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2618)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information about makers is critical to bibliographic research, and special collections cataloging norms provide maker metadata. Still, access to maker metadata is hampered in online library catalogs. This article investigates the betterment of maker metadata in (or alongside) library catalogs using existing content guidelines, encoding schemas, and data models. Discussion finds that libraries have appropriate tools for improving access to maker metadata. This article thus encourages the profession to coordinate access to maker metadata. Cooperative maker description and the merger and/or linking of datasets generated by the research community are suggested areas for future investigation.
    Date
    19. 1.2016 15:45:26
  15. Alonso Lifante, M.P.; Molero Madrid, F.J.: Enhancing OPAC records : evaluating and fitting within cataloguing standards a new proposal of description parameters for historical astronomical resources (2015) 0.13
    0.12658575 = product of:
      0.2531715 = sum of:
        0.17477486 = weight(_text_:description in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17477486 = score(doc=2611,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.75496364 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
        0.07839665 = sum of:
          0.037919957 = weight(_text_:access in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037919957 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
          0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.040476695 = score(doc=2611,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04979191 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2611, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2611)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Enhancing content description of specialized resources, particularly astronomical resources, is a matter that is still unresolved in library and information science. In this paper, the authors outline deficiencies in some fields and elements of cataloging standards for description of historical astronomical resources, mainly star atlases and catalogs. Furthermore, they review their recent proposal of astronomical parameters for a better description and propose an approach for accommodating these parameters in the current criteria of MARC 21, the International Standard Bibliographic Description, and Resource Description and Access. Fourteen new parameters are considered, and recommendations are provided to standards developers for the addition of elements to accommodate attributes of celestial cartographic resources. This would improve bibliographic records for such resources in astronomical libraries' OPACs, which will have a beneficial effect on information retrieval.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Ibarra, A.M.T. -> Talavera Ibarra, A.M.: 0.12
    0.122808814 = product of:
      0.24561763 = sum of:
        0.16466424 = weight(_text_:26 in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16466424 = score(doc=2351,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.9364366 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
        0.08095339 = product of:
          0.16190678 = sum of:
            0.16190678 = weight(_text_:22 in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16190678 = score(doc=2351,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.92856276 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    3. 8.2006 14:22:26
  17. Craven, T.C.: 'DESCRIPTION' META tags in locally linked web pages (2001) 0.12
    0.122579426 = product of:
      0.24515885 = sum of:
        0.19027077 = weight(_text_:description in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19027077 = score(doc=701,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.8219003 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.05488808 = weight(_text_:26 in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05488808 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.31214553 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Advice given in printed and web-based sources on HTML META tags with NAME='DESCRIPTION' is surveyed.To determin patterns of relationships among descriptions on the same site,links were followed automatically from 460 pages registered withYahoo! and previously found to contain descriptions.Sites where the registered page pointed to many other pages were significantly less likely to reuse the same description on those other pages; where different descriptions were used words from the registered page's description tended to appear toward the beginnings of other descriptions.
    Date
    20. 1.2007 19:36:26
  18. Dillon, M.: ¬The OCLC Internet Resources Project : toward providing library services for computer-mediated communication (1994) 0.12
    0.12191467 = product of:
      0.1625529 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 5364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=5364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 5364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5364)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 5364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=5364,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5364, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5364)
        0.03128237 = product of:
          0.06256474 = sum of:
            0.06256474 = weight(_text_:access in 5364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06256474 = score(doc=5364,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 5364, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    OCLC's Internet Resources Project investigated the nature of electronic textual information available through remote Internet access, focusing on the practical and theoretical problems associated with creating MARC records. Details the project methods and results. The findings reveal aspects of electronic information objects available via the Internet, provide a taxonomy of the file types available via FTP, and a substantive body of data on the suitability of conventional methods for providing bibliographic description and access for Internet information objects. Makes recommendations for cataloguing Internet resources
    Date
    20.10.2000 11:31:26
  19. Armstrong, H.; Lundgren, J.: Cataloging aerial photograpbs and other remote-sensing materials (1999) 0.12
    0.12191467 = product of:
      0.1625529 = sum of:
        0.08324346 = weight(_text_:description in 5326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08324346 = score(doc=5326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.35958138 = fieldWeight in 5326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5326)
        0.048027072 = weight(_text_:26 in 5326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048027072 = score(doc=5326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.27312735 = fieldWeight in 5326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5326)
        0.03128237 = product of:
          0.06256474 = sum of:
            0.06256474 = weight(_text_:access in 5326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06256474 = score(doc=5326,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16876608 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 5326, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5326)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Remote-sensing images are valuable library resources, which provide highly useful information to a variety of library patrons. They are graphic representations of spatial relationships recorded by a device that was not in physical contact with the geographic entity being studied. Effective access and description in the library catalog is necessary so that these images may be found and used. This article discusses characteristics of remote-sensing images and maps: how to identify them; and how to catalog, classify and provide subject access for them. A variety of remote-sensing items and their catalog records are reproduced and discussed, including application of the new Remote-sensing 007 field.
    Date
    26. 7.2006 10:19:12
  20. Zavalina, O.; Palmer, C.L.; Jackson, A.S.; Han, M.-J.: Assessing descriptive substance in free-text collection-level metadata (2008) 0.12
    0.12173304 = product of:
      0.16231072 = sum of:
        0.10090631 = weight(_text_:description in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10090631 = score(doc=2647,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23150103 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.43587846 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.64937 = idf(docFreq=1149, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
        0.04116606 = weight(_text_:26 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116606 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17584132 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04979191 = queryNorm
            0.23410915 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5315237 = idf(docFreq=3516, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
        0.020238347 = product of:
          0.040476695 = sum of:
            0.040476695 = weight(_text_:22 in 2647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040476695 = score(doc=2647,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17436278 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04979191 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2647, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2647)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Collection-level metadata has the potential to provide important information about the features and purpose of individual collections. This paper reports on a content analysis of collection records in an aggregation of cultural heritage collections. The findings show that the free-text Description field often provides more accurate and complete representation of subjects and object types than the specified fields. Properties such as importance, uniqueness, comprehensiveness, provenance, and creator are articulated, as well as other vital contextual information about the intentions of a collector and the value of a collection, as a whole, for scholarly users. The results demonstrate that the semantically rich free-text Description field is essential to understanding the context of collections in large aggregations and can serve as a source of data for enhancing and customizing controlled vocabularies.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications