-
Birmingham, J.: Internet search engines (1996)
0.13
0.12555163 = product of:
0.25110325 = sum of:
0.25110325 = sum of:
0.1665635 = weight(_text_:search in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1665635 = score(doc=5664,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.921628 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.08453976 = weight(_text_:22 in 5664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08453976 = score(doc=5664,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5664, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5664)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Basically a good listing in table format of features from the major search engines
- Content
- Darstellung zu verschiedenen search engines des Internet
- Date
- 10.11.1996 16:36:22
- Source
- http://www.stark.k12.oh.us/Docs/search/
-
Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970)
0.11
0.11188102 = product of:
0.22376204 = sum of:
0.22376204 = sum of:
0.111042336 = weight(_text_:search in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.111042336 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.6144187 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
0.11271969 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11271969 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2005 19:53:09
-
Roto, V.: Search on mobile phones. (2006)
0.11
0.10669871 = product of:
0.21339741 = sum of:
0.21339741 = sum of:
0.15703757 = weight(_text_:search in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15703757 = score(doc=5304,freq=16.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.86891925 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=5304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The search tools familiar from the personal computer are propagating to mobile devices. Are users willing to type keywords with the limited keypad of an ordinary mobile phone? How does mobile search differ from stationary search? The author found that users are surprisingly willing to use search also with the traditional phone keypad, and foresees a search revolution as mobile devices enable location-based search.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:35:39
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.10
0.103721194 = sum of:
0.08258625 = product of:
0.24775875 = sum of:
0.24775875 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24775875 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4408377 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.02113494 = product of:
0.04226988 = sum of:
0.04226988 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04226988 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Notess, G.R.: DejaNews and other Usenet search tools (1998)
0.10
0.10192698 = product of:
0.20385396 = sum of:
0.20385396 = sum of:
0.1241491 = weight(_text_:search in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1241491 = score(doc=5229,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.68694097 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
0.07970486 = weight(_text_:22 in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07970486 = score(doc=5229,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Internet Newsgroup archives on services such as DejaNews offer important sources of information that may not be found elsewhere online. Describes the content of the DejaNews Database which goes back to 1995 and covers more than 14,000 newsgroups. There are 2 search options: quick search and power search. Most Web search engines offer links to DejaNews, but AltaVista offers a smaller alternative and supplement to DejaNews. Reference.COM also offers a searchable archive, as well as a useful current awareness service which allows setting up multiple searches under the user profile tab
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
-
Iivonen, M.: Consistency in the selection of search concepts and search terms (1995)
0.10
0.10177215 = product of:
0.2035443 = sum of:
0.2035443 = sum of:
0.16127442 = weight(_text_:search in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16127442 = score(doc=1757,freq=30.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.89236253 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.04226988 = weight(_text_:22 in 1757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04226988 = score(doc=1757,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1757, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1757)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency in the selection of search terms. Based on an empirical study where 22 searchers from 4 different types of search environments analyzed altogether 12 search requests of 4 different types in 2 separate test situations between which 2 months elapsed. Statistically very significant differences in consistency were found according to the types of search environments and search requests. Consistency was also considered according to the extent of the scope of search concept. At level I search terms were compared character by character. At level II different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a rather simple evaluation of linguistic expressions. At level III, in addition to level II, the hierarchical approach of the search request was also controlled. At level IV different search terms were accepted as the same search concept with a broad interpretation of the search concept. Both intersearcher and intrasearcher consistency grew most immediately after a rather simple evaluation of linguistic impressions
-
Vidmar, D.J.: Darwin on the Web : the evolution of search tools (1999)
0.10
0.09789589 = product of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.097162046 = weight(_text_:search in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097162046 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.09862973 = weight(_text_:22 in 3175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862973 = score(doc=3175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Computers in libraries. 19(1999) no.5, S.22-28
-
Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000)
0.10
0.09789589 = product of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.097162046 = weight(_text_:search in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097162046 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.09862973 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862973 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 25. 8.2005 17:42:22
-
Dunning, A.: Do we still need search engines? (1999)
0.10
0.09789589 = product of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.097162046 = weight(_text_:search in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097162046 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
0.09862973 = weight(_text_:22 in 6021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862973 = score(doc=6021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Ariadne. 1999, no.22
-
Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973)
0.10
0.09789589 = product of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.19579178 = sum of:
0.097162046 = weight(_text_:search in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097162046 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5376164 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
0.09862973 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09862973 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.2005 19:52:29
-
Berinstein, P.: Turning visual : image search engines on the Web (1998)
0.10
0.09617919 = product of:
0.19235837 = sum of:
0.19235837 = sum of:
0.13599853 = weight(_text_:search in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13599853 = score(doc=3595,freq=12.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.75250614 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=3595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Gives an overview of image search engines on the Web. They work by: looking for graphics files; looking for a caption; looking for Web sites whose titles indicate the presence of picturres on a certain subject; or employing human intervention. Describes the image search capabilities of: AltaVista; Amazing Picture Machine (Http://www.ncrtec.org/picture.htm); HotBot; ImageSurfer (http://ipix.yahoo.com); Lycos; Web Clip Art Search Engine and WebSEEK. The search engines employing human intervention provide the best results
- Object
- Web Clip Art Search Engine
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.37-38,40-42
-
Sukiasyan, E.: Homo quaerens (the seeking man) : on the problem of development of the reader's cognitive capacities in the searching process (1992)
0.09
0.09025447 = product of:
0.18050894 = sum of:
0.18050894 = sum of:
0.1241491 = weight(_text_:search in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1241491 = score(doc=2380,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.68694097 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2380) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=2380,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2380, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2380)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Analyses the process of search of bibliographical information through the catalogue. Preference is given to the interactive and interdependent search by the user himself, who should organisze the search, chosse its parameters and the information he needs. Search through the bibliographer or automated search with the delivery of a ready list is always formal, less effective and lacks cognitive aspects
- Pages
- S.15-22
-
Conhaim, W.W.: Search tools (1996)
0.09
0.09025447 = product of:
0.18050894 = sum of:
0.18050894 = sum of:
0.1241491 = weight(_text_:search in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1241491 = score(doc=4738,freq=10.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.68694097 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.056359846 = weight(_text_:22 in 4738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056359846 = score(doc=4738,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4738, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4738)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the 3 most popular searching tools for the WWW: InfoSeek, Yahoo and Lycos. Searching Internet directories can also be a useful search technique. Lists other searching engines. Points out a number of evaluations of these search engines published on the WWW. A number of search tools are available for specialized areas. Sites are available that enable parallel searching using several tools at once. Describes WWW pages with information about search engines
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:39:31
-
Lopatovska, I.: Toward a model of emotions and mood in the online information search process (2014)
0.09
0.08914983 = product of:
0.17829967 = sum of:
0.17829967 = sum of:
0.14307477 = weight(_text_:search in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14307477 = score(doc=1348,freq=34.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.7916603 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
0.035224903 = weight(_text_:22 in 1348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035224903 = score(doc=1348,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1348, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1348)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This article reports the results of a study that examined relationships between primary emotions, secondary emotions, and mood in the online information search context. During the experiment, participants were asked to search Google to obtain information on the two given search tasks. Participants' primary emotions were inferred from analysis of their facial expressions, data on secondary emotions were obtained through participant interviews, and mood was measured using the Positive Affect Negative Affect Scale (PANAS; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) prior, during, and after the search. The search process was represented by the collection of search actions, search performance, and search outcome quality variables. The findings suggest existence of direct relationships between primary emotions and search actions, which in turn imply the possibility of inferring emotions from search actions and vice versa. The link between secondary emotions and searchers' evaluative judgments, and lack of evidence of any relationships between secondary emotions and other search process variables, point to the strengths and weaknesses of self-reported emotion measures in understanding searchers' affective experiences. Our study did not find strong relationships between mood and search process and outcomes, indicating that while mood can have a limited effect on search activities, it is a relatively stable and long-lasting state that cannot be easily altered by the search experience and, in turn, cannot significantly affect the search. The article proposes a model of relationships between emotions, mood, and several facets of the search process. Directions for future work are also discussed.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:58:40
-
Marchiori, M.: ¬The quest for correct information on the Web : hyper search engines (1997)
0.09
0.08892408 = product of:
0.17784816 = sum of:
0.17784816 = sum of:
0.1285333 = weight(_text_:search in 7453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1285333 = score(doc=7453,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.71119964 = fieldWeight in 7453, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7453)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 7453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=7453,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7453, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7453)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Presents a novel method to extract from a web object its hyper informative content, in contrast with current search engines, which only deal with the textual information content. This method is not only valuable per se, but it is shown to be able to considerably increase the precision of current search engines. It integrates with existing search engine technology since it can be implemented on top of every search engine, acting as a post-processor, thus automatically transforming a search engine into its corresponding hyper version. Shows how the hyper information can be usefully employed to face the search engines persuasion problem
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Wildemuth, B.M.: Evidence-based practice in search interface design (2006)
0.09
0.08892408 = product of:
0.17784816 = sum of:
0.17784816 = sum of:
0.1285333 = weight(_text_:search in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1285333 = score(doc=5302,freq=14.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.71119964 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.049314864 = weight(_text_:22 in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049314864 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are best practices and incorporate them into future search interfaces.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:30:09
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
-
Hock, R.E.: How to do field searching in Web search engines : a field trip (1998)
0.09
0.08793517 = product of:
0.17587034 = sum of:
0.17587034 = sum of:
0.096165486 = weight(_text_:search in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096165486 = score(doc=3601,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.5321022 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.07970486 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07970486 = score(doc=3601,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Explains how 5 Internet search engines (AltaVista, HotBot, InfoSeek, Lycos, and Yahoo) handle field searching. Includes a chart which identifies where on a search engine's page a particular field is searched and the prefix syntax used, and gives examples. Details the individual fields that can be searched: data, title, URL, images, audiovideo and other page content, links and page depth
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.3, S.18-22
-
Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff)
0.09
0.08643433 = sum of:
0.06882188 = product of:
0.20646563 = sum of:
0.20646563 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20646563 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4408377 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.017612452 = product of:
0.035224903 = sum of:
0.035224903 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035224903 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- 1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.09
0.08617224 = sum of:
0.06882188 = product of:
0.20646563 = sum of:
0.20646563 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20646563 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4408377 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.017350364 = product of:
0.03470073 = sum of:
0.03470073 = weight(_text_:search in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03470073 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.19200584 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
-
Westmancoat, J.: ¬The new British Library Maps file : how to get the best from a Blaise search (1997)
0.08
0.08429915 = product of:
0.1685983 = sum of:
0.1685983 = sum of:
0.09814849 = weight(_text_:search in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09814849 = score(doc=1629,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18072747 = queryWeight, product of:
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.54307455 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.475677 = idf(docFreq=3718, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
0.07044981 = weight(_text_:22 in 1629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07044981 = score(doc=1629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18208735 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051997773 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In July 1997 the first part of the major retrospective conversion programme on the British Library's Maps catalogue was completed. Discusses the scope of the enlarged file and outlines changes in search techniques, geographic headings and searching by data
- Date
- 17. 1.1999 13:49:22
