Search (6354 results, page 1 of 318)

  1. Kaiser, J.: Systematic indexing (1911) 0.41
    0.41396588 = product of:
      0.6209488 = sum of:
        0.50719744 = weight(_text_:systematic in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.50719744 = score(doc=225,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            1.7860854 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
        0.11375134 = product of:
          0.22750267 = sum of:
            0.22750267 = weight(_text_:indexing in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22750267 = score(doc=225,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                1.1962087 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Object
    Kaiser systematic indexing
  2. Kaiser, J.: Systematic indexing (1926) 0.33
    0.33117267 = product of:
      0.496759 = sum of:
        0.40575793 = weight(_text_:systematic in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40575793 = score(doc=217,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            1.4288683 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
        0.09100107 = product of:
          0.18200214 = sum of:
            0.18200214 = weight(_text_:indexing in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18200214 = score(doc=217,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.95696694 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Object
    Kaiser systematic indexing
  3. Vickery, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing (1953) 0.29
    0.29271805 = product of:
      0.43907708 = sum of:
        0.35864273 = weight(_text_:systematic in 2038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.35864273 = score(doc=2038,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            1.262953 = fieldWeight in 2038, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2038)
        0.08043434 = product of:
          0.16086867 = sum of:
            0.16086867 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16086867 = score(doc=2038,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.84584725 = fieldWeight in 2038, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2038)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  4. Mehl, S.: Systematic alternatives in lexicalization : the cases of gerund translation (1996) 0.23
    0.22717795 = product of:
      0.3407669 = sum of:
        0.28691417 = weight(_text_:systematic in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.28691417 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            1.0103624 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
        0.053852726 = product of:
          0.10770545 = sum of:
            0.10770545 = weight(_text_:22 in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10770545 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    31. 7.1996 9:22:19
  5. Rodriguez, R.D.: Kaiser's systematic indexing (1984) 0.21
    0.2085483 = product of:
      0.31282246 = sum of:
        0.24847499 = weight(_text_:systematic in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24847499 = score(doc=4521,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.8749996 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
        0.064347476 = product of:
          0.12869495 = sum of:
            0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12869495 = score(doc=4521,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    J. Kaiser (1868-1927) developed a system of subject indexing based on what he called "concretes" and "processes" to govern the form of subject headings and subdivisions. Although Kaiser applied his systematic indexing to specialized technical and business collections, his ideas are entirely applicable to all book collections and catalogs. Though largely ignored, Kaiser's system is of permanent interest in the study of the development of subject analysis
    Object
    Kaiser systematic indexing
  6. Dousa, T.M.: Documentary languages and the demarcation of information units in textual information : the case of Julius O. Kaisers's Systematic Indexing (2014) 0.21
    0.20698294 = product of:
      0.3104744 = sum of:
        0.25359872 = weight(_text_:systematic in 1311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25359872 = score(doc=1311,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.8930427 = fieldWeight in 1311, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1311)
        0.05687567 = product of:
          0.11375134 = sum of:
            0.11375134 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11375134 = score(doc=1311,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.59810436 = fieldWeight in 1311, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1311)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Object
    Kaisers's Systematic Indexing
  7. Belter, C.W.: Citation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviews (2016) 0.19
    0.1917852 = product of:
      0.2876778 = sum of:
        0.26354748 = weight(_text_:systematic in 3158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.26354748 = score(doc=3158,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.9280771 = fieldWeight in 3158, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3158)
        0.024130303 = product of:
          0.048260607 = sum of:
            0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048260607 = score(doc=3158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 3158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Systematic reviews are essential for evaluating biomedical treatment options, but the growing size and complexity of the available biomedical literature combined with the rigor of the systematic review method mean that systematic reviews are extremely difficult and labor-intensive to perform. In this article, I propose a method of searching the literature by systematically mining the various types of citation relationships between articles. I then test the method by comparing its precision and recall to that of 14 published systematic reviews. The method successfully retrieved 74% of the studies included in these reviews and 90% of the studies it could reasonably be expected to retrieve. The method also retrieved fewer than half of the total number of publications retrieved by these reviews and can be performed in substantially less time. This suggests that the proposed method offers a promising complement to traditional text-based methods of literature identification and retrieval for systematic reviews.
    Theme
    Citation indexing
  8. Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002) 0.17
    0.16634454 = product of:
      0.2495168 = sum of:
        0.20287897 = weight(_text_:systematic in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20287897 = score(doc=136,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.71443415 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
        0.04663783 = product of:
          0.09327566 = sum of:
            0.09327566 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09327566 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper suggests a framework and systematic definitions for 6 words commonly used in dthe field of information science: data, information, knowledge, wisdom, inspiration, and intelligence. We intend these definitions to lead to a quantification of information science, a quantification that will enable their measurement, manipulastion, and prediction.
    Date
    22. 2.2007 18:56:23
    22. 2.2007 19:22:13
  9. Dousa, T.M.: Categories and the architectonics of system in Julius Otto Kaiser's method of systematic indexing (2014) 0.15
    0.15341035 = product of:
      0.2301155 = sum of:
        0.12679936 = weight(_text_:systematic in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12679936 = score(doc=1418,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.44652134 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
        0.103316136 = sum of:
          0.06965818 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06965818 = score(doc=1418,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049684696 = queryNorm
              0.3662626 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
          0.033657953 = weight(_text_:22 in 1418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033657953 = score(doc=1418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049684696 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1418)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Categories, or concepts of high generality representing the most basic kinds of entities in the world, have long been understood to be a fundamental element in the construction of knowledge organization systems (KOSs), particularly faceted ones. Commentators on facet analysis have tended to foreground the role of categories in the structuring of controlled vocabularies and the construction of compound index terms, and the implications of this for subject representation and information retrieval. Less attention has been paid to the variety of ways in which categories can shape the overall architectonic framework of a KOS. This case study explores the range of functions that categories took in structuring various aspects of an early analytico-synthetic KOS, Julius Otto Kaiser's method of Systematic Indexing (SI). Within SI, categories not only functioned as mechanisms to partition an index vocabulary into smaller groupings of terms and as elements in the construction of compound index terms but also served as means of defining the units of indexing, or index items, incorporated into an index; determining the organization of card index files and the articulation of the guide card system serving as a navigational aids thereto; and setting structural constraints to the establishment of cross-references between terms. In all these ways, Kaiser's system of categories contributed to the general systematicity of SI.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  10. Koch, T.: Quality-controlled subject gateways : definitions, typologies, empirical overview (2000) 0.15
    0.15263343 = product of:
      0.22895013 = sum of:
        0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12552495 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
        0.103425175 = sum of:
          0.05630404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05630404 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049684696 = queryNorm
              0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
          0.047121134 = weight(_text_:22 in 631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047121134 = score(doc=631,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049684696 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 631, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=631)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    'Quality-controlled subject gateways' are Internet services which apply a rich set of quality measures to support systematic resource discovery. Considerable manual effort is used to secure a selection of resources which meet quality criteria and to display a rich description of these resources with standards-based metadata. Regular checking and updating ensure good collection management. A main goal is to provide a high quality of subject access through indexing resources using controlled vocabularies and by offering a deep classification structure for advanced searching and browsing. This article provides an initial empirical overview of existing services of this kind, their approaches and technologies, based on proposed working definitions and typologies of subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:37:55
  11. Dousa, T.: Everything Old is New Again : Perspectivism and Polyhierarchy in Julius O. Kaiser's Theory of Systematic Indexing (2007) 0.15
    0.15238476 = product of:
      0.22857714 = sum of:
        0.17932136 = weight(_text_:systematic in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17932136 = score(doc=4835,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.6314765 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
        0.049255773 = product of:
          0.09851155 = sum of:
            0.09851155 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09851155 = score(doc=4835,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.51797354 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In the early years of the 20th century, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927), a special librarian and indexer of technical literature, developed a method of knowledge organization (KO) known as systematic indexing. Certain elements of the method-its stipulation that all indexing terms be divided into fundamental categories "concretes", "countries", and "processes", which are then to be synthesized into indexing "statements" formulated according to strict rules of citation order-have long been recognized as precursors to key principles of the theory of faceted classification. However, other, less well-known elements of the method may prove no less interesting to practitioners of KO. In particular, two aspects of systematic indexing seem to prefigure current trends in KO: (1) a perspectivist outlook that rejects universal classifications in favor of information organization systems customized to reflect local needs and (2) the incorporation of index terms extracted from source documents into a polyhierarchical taxonomical structure. Kaiser's perspectivism anticipates postmodern theories of KO, while his principled use of polyhierarchy to organize terms derived from the language of source documents provides a potentially fruitful model that can inform current discussions about harvesting natural-language terms, such as tags, and incorporating them into a flexibly structured controlled vocabulary.
    Object
    Kaiser systematic indexing
  12. Dousa, T.M.: Empirical observation, rational structures, and pragmatist aims : epistemology and method in Julius Otto Kaiser's theory of systematic indexing (2008) 0.15
    0.15210077 = product of:
      0.22815116 = sum of:
        0.18635625 = weight(_text_:systematic in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18635625 = score(doc=2508,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.6562497 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
        0.041794907 = product of:
          0.083589815 = sum of:
            0.083589815 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.083589815 = score(doc=2508,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.4395151 = fieldWeight in 2508, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2508)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Hjoerland's typology of the epistemological positions underlying methods for designing KO systems recognizes four basic epistemological positions: empiricism, rationalism, historicism, and pragmatism. Application of this typology to close analysis of Julius Otto Kaiser's theory of systematic indexing shows that his epistemological and methodological positions were hybrid in nature. Kaiser's epistemology was primarily empiricist and pragmatist in nature, whereas his methodology was pragmatist in aim but rationalist in mechanics. Unexpected synergy between the pragmatist and rationalist elements of Kaiser's methodology is evidenced by his stated motivations for the admission of polyhierarchy into syndetic structure. The application of Hjørland's typology to similar analyses of other KO systems may uncover other cases of epistemological-methodological eclecticism and synergy.
    Object
    Kaisers systematic indexing
  13. Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing (1985) 0.14
    0.14084071 = product of:
      0.21126106 = sum of:
        0.16038992 = weight(_text_:systematic in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16038992 = score(doc=571,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.5648098 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
        0.050871145 = product of:
          0.10174229 = sum of:
            0.10174229 = weight(_text_:indexing in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10174229 = score(doc=571,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.5349608 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.
    Footnote
    Original in: Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing. London: Pitman 1991. Vol. II, Paragraphs 1-18, 52-58, 295-348.
    Object
    Kaiser systematic indexing
  14. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.13
    0.13082865 = product of:
      0.19624296 = sum of:
        0.10759281 = weight(_text_:systematic in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10759281 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
        0.08865015 = sum of:
          0.048260607 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048260607 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049684696 = queryNorm
              0.2537542 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04038954 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049684696 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LSCH), which celebrated its 100th birthday in 1998, is the largest cataloging and indexing language in the world for the indication of the topics and formats of books and similar publications. It consists of a controlled list of main headings, many with subdivisions, with a rich system of cross references. It is supported by the U.S. government, and undergoes systematic revision. In recent decades its managers have begun to confront challenges such as biased terminology, complicated syntax (how terms are put together to form headings), and effective displays in electronic media. Many suggestions have been made for its improvement, including moving to a fully faceted system.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
  15. Fugmann, R.: Subject analysis and indexing : theoretical foundation and practical advice (1993) 0.13
    0.12965536 = product of:
      0.19448304 = sum of:
        0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 8756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12552495 = score(doc=8756,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 8756, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8756)
        0.06895808 = product of:
          0.13791616 = sum of:
            0.13791616 = weight(_text_:indexing in 8756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13791616 = score(doc=8756,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.7251629 = fieldWeight in 8756, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8756)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Enthält folgende Kapitel: Information and information systems; Information system survival power; Theoretical considerations on information storage and retrieval; Indexing (representation of the essence of documents; extractive, assignment, consistent indexing, indexing and abstracting, book indexing, index language vocabulary, syntax, concept analysis, evaluation of indexing quality); Technology of information supply; Glossary of terms used; Systematic and 'basic index'
  16. Faraj, N.: Analyse d'une methode d'indexation automatique basée sur une analyse syntaxique de texte (1996) 0.13
    0.12597175 = product of:
      0.18895762 = sum of:
        0.14345708 = weight(_text_:systematic in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14345708 = score(doc=685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.5051812 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
        0.045500536 = product of:
          0.09100107 = sum of:
            0.09100107 = weight(_text_:indexing in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09100107 = score(doc=685,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.47848347 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Evaluates an automatic indexing method based on syntactical text analysis combined with statistical analysis. Tests many combinations for the choice of term categories and weighting methods. The experiment, conducted on a software engineering corpus, shows systematic improvement in the use of syntactic term phrases compared to using only individual words as index terms
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Analysis of an automatic indexing method based on syntactic analysis of text
  17. Chitty, A.B.: Indexing for the online catalog (1987) 0.13
    0.12597175 = product of:
      0.18895762 = sum of:
        0.14345708 = weight(_text_:systematic in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14345708 = score(doc=740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.5051812 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
        0.045500536 = product of:
          0.09100107 = sum of:
            0.09100107 = weight(_text_:indexing in 740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09100107 = score(doc=740,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.47848347 = fieldWeight in 740, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=740)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of online public access catalogs (OPACs) requires some systematic rationale for the comparative evaluation of their designs. Considered as an indexing application, the OPAC can be analyzed by three features: the variety of bibliographic data processed, the kinds of indexes constructed, and the ways in which the indexes are searched. No one configuration appiles to every library research project with equal efficacy or likelihood of satisfying queries. However, the rationale proposed can compare and evaluate alternative library computer catalogs in term of the library's understanding of the relationship between the library's collections and their use
  18. Hjoerland, B.: Indexing: concepts and theory (2018) 0.13
    0.12508266 = product of:
      0.18762398 = sum of:
        0.10759281 = weight(_text_:systematic in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10759281 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.3788859 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
        0.080031164 = product of:
          0.16006233 = sum of:
            0.16006233 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16006233 = score(doc=4644,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.84160745 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses definitions of index and indexing and provides a systematic overview of kinds of indexes. Theories of indexing are reviewed, and the theoretical basis of both manual indexing and automatic indexing is discussed, and a classification of theories is suggested (rationalist, cognitivist, empiricist, and historicist and pragmatist theories). It is claimed that although many researchers do not consider indexing to be a theoretical issue (or consider it to be a field without theories) indexing is indeed highly theory-laden (and the idea of atheoretical indexing is an oxymoron). An important issue is also the subjectivity of the indexer, in particular, her socio-cultural and paradigmatic background, as for example, when authors of documents are the best indexers of their own documents. The article contains a section about the tools available for indexing in the form of the indexing languages and their nature. It is concluded that the social epistemology first proposed by Jesse Shera in 1951 provides the most fruitful theoretical framework for indexing.
  19. Devadason, F.J.: Online construction of alphabetic classaurus : a vocabulary control and indexing tool (1985) 0.12
    0.12209346 = product of:
      0.18314019 = sum of:
        0.16038992 = weight(_text_:systematic in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16038992 = score(doc=1467,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.5648098 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
        0.022750268 = product of:
          0.045500536 = sum of:
            0.045500536 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1467) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045500536 = score(doc=1467,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.23924173 = fieldWeight in 1467, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1467)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Classaurus is a faceted hierarchic scheme of terms with vocabulary control features. It is a system of terms having separate hierarchic schedules of the elementary categories: discipline, entity, property and action, together with their respective species/types, parts and special modifiers. Also there are separate schedules for the common modifiers: form, time, environment, and place. Each of the terms in these hierarchic schedules is enriched with synonyms, quasi synonyms etc. The hierarchic schedules constituting the systematic part is supplemented by ab alphabetical index of chain entries. Classaurus is used in the formulation of subject headings in general, and in particular, subject headings according to the Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing (POPSI) language. For the construction of classaurus the POPSI language itself provides guidelines. A set or programs have been developed to construct a classaurus using as input, subject headings formulated according to POPSI language which are enriches with certain codes to deniote the different elementary categories, their species, parts, special modifiers and other common modifiers of different kinds. The resulting classaurus has hierarchic schedules but terms in an array are arranged only alphabetically. The hierarchic schedules constitute the systematic part of the classaurus. The system generates an alphabetic index part to the systematic part, in which for each term its broader terms are kept to its right hand side successively along with a code to denote the schedule to which the term belongs. To find out the position of a term in the systematic part, the whole entry for the term in the alphabetic part is taken and the sequence of the terms in it is reversed. Using the code for the schedule in the entry, the appropriate hierarchic schedule is selected. The schedule is then searched using the broader terms successively as keys until the the term in question is reached, wherein all the hierarchically related terms could be found, including synonyms, quasi-synonyms etc. Both the systematic part and the alphabetical index part are printed out for manual reference and also kept as direct access files for on-line access and on-the-spot updating and building up of the classaurus while inputting new subject headings formulated for this purpose
  20. Nielsen, H.J.: ¬The nature of fiction and its significance for classification and indexing (1997) 0.12
    0.12121933 = product of:
      0.18182899 = sum of:
        0.12552495 = weight(_text_:systematic in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12552495 = score(doc=1785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.049684696 = queryNorm
            0.44203353 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
        0.05630404 = product of:
          0.11260808 = sum of:
            0.11260808 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11260808 = score(doc=1785,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049684696 = queryNorm
                0.5920931 = fieldWeight in 1785, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1785)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the nature of fiction in relation to classification and indexing systems. Literary theory today is very heterogeneous. In designing an indexing system a single trend of school should not be chosen. Following a systematic extension and development of the 'how' facet of fictional documents is an useful approach. Themes should be a visible aspect in classification and indexing systems. Aspects of literary history, period, literary movement and influence should be noted

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 5366
  • m 558
  • el 280
  • s 243
  • b 46
  • x 45
  • r 40
  • i 26
  • p 15
  • ? 10
  • n 7
  • d 6
  • z 3
  • u 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications