Search (7450 results, page 1 of 373)

  1. #1483 0.26
    0.25714758 = product of:
      0.38572136 = sum of:
        0.27091292 = weight(_text_:semantic in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27091292 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            1.2862723 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
        0.11480845 = product of:
          0.2296169 = sum of:
            0.2296169 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2296169 = score(doc=1482,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050655533 = queryNorm
                1.1841862 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Object
    LSI -> Latent Semantic Indexing
  2. Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012) 0.25
    0.24924026 = product of:
      0.3738604 = sum of:
        0.12980995 = weight(_text_:semantic in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12980995 = score(doc=3197,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.616327 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
        0.24405044 = sum of:
          0.2028717 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2028717 = score(doc=3197,freq=34.0), product of:
              0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              1.0462552 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
                5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                  34.0 = termFreq=34.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
          0.04117875 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04117875 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17738704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Indexing consists of both novel and more traditional techniques. Cutting-edge indexing techniques, such as automatic indexing, ontologies, and topic maps, were developed independently of older techniques such as thesauri, but it is now recognized that these older methods also hold expertise. Indexing describes various traditional and novel indexing techniques, giving information professionals and students of library and information sciences a broad and comprehensible introduction to indexing. This title consists of twelve chapters: an Introduction to subject readings and theasauri; Automatic indexing versus manual indexing; Techniques applied in automatic indexing of text material; Automatic indexing of images; The black art of indexing moving images; Automatic indexing of music; Taxonomies and ontologies; Metadata formats and indexing; Tagging; Topic maps; Indexing the web; and The Semantic Web.
    Date
    24. 8.2016 14:03:22
    LCSH
    Indexing
    RSWK
    Semantic Web
    Subject
    Semantic Web
    Indexing
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  3. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Nagelschmidt, M.: Semantic knowledge representation for information retrieval (2014) 0.22
    0.22141683 = product of:
      0.33212525 = sum of:
        0.19253927 = weight(_text_:semantic in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19253927 = score(doc=987,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.91416067 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
        0.13958599 = sum of:
          0.09840724 = weight(_text_:indexing in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09840724 = score(doc=987,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.5075084 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
          0.04117875 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04117875 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17738704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This book covers the basics of semantic web technologies and indexing languages, and describes their contribution to improve languages as a tool for subject queries and knowledge exploration. The book is relevant to information scientists, knowledge workers and indexers. It provides a suitable combination of theoretical foundations and practical applications.
    Content
    Introduction: envisioning semantic information spacesIndexing and knowledge organization -- Semantic technologies for knowledge representation -- Information retrieval and knowledge exploration -- Approaches to handle heterogeneity -- Problems with establishing semantic interoperability -- Formalization in indexing languages -- Typification of semantic relations -- Inferences in retrieval processes -- Semantic interoperability and inferences -- Remaining research questions.
    Date
    23. 7.2017 13:49:22
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    Indexing
    RSWK
    Semantic Web
    Subject
    Semantic Web
    Indexing
    Semantic Web
  4. Gordon, M.D.; Dumais, S.: Using latent semantic indexing for literature based discovery (1998) 0.19
    0.18861692 = product of:
      0.28292537 = sum of:
        0.13545646 = weight(_text_:semantic in 4892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13545646 = score(doc=4892,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.64313614 = fieldWeight in 4892, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4892)
        0.14746891 = sum of:
          0.09942703 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09942703 = score(doc=4892,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.5127677 = fieldWeight in 4892, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4892)
          0.048041876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048041876 = score(doc=4892,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17738704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4892, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4892)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Latent semantic indexing (LSI) is a statistical technique for improving information retrieval effectiveness. Here, we use LSI to assist in literature-based discoveries. The idea behind literature-based discoveries is that different authors have already published certain underlying scientific ideas that, when taken together, can be connected to hypothesize a new dicovery, and that these connections can be made by exploring the scientific literature. We explore latent semantic indexing's effectiveness on 2 discovery processes: uncovering 'nearby' relationships that are necessary to initiate the literature based discovery process; and discovering more distant relationships that may genuinely generate new discovery hypotheses
    Date
    11. 2.2016 16:22:19
    Object
    Latent Semantic Indexing
  5. Story, R.E.: Latent semantic indexing (1998) 0.18
    0.18183081 = product of:
      0.2727462 = sum of:
        0.19156437 = weight(_text_:semantic in 1105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19156437 = score(doc=1105,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.90953195 = fieldWeight in 1105, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1105)
        0.081181824 = product of:
          0.16236365 = sum of:
            0.16236365 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16236365 = score(doc=1105,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050655533 = queryNorm
                0.8373461 = fieldWeight in 1105, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Object
    Latent Semantic Indexing
  6. Chute, C.G.: Latent semantic indexing of medical diagnoses using UMLS semantic structures (1992) 0.18
    0.18045676 = product of:
      0.27068514 = sum of:
        0.2011007 = weight(_text_:semantic in 5728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2011007 = score(doc=5728,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.95480967 = fieldWeight in 5728, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5728)
        0.06958442 = product of:
          0.13916884 = sum of:
            0.13916884 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13916884 = score(doc=5728,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050655533 = queryNorm
                0.7177252 = fieldWeight in 5728, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Object
    Latent Semantic Indexing
  7. Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003) 0.17
    0.1712607 = product of:
      0.25689104 = sum of:
        0.15144494 = weight(_text_:semantic in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15144494 = score(doc=1026,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.71904814 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
        0.1054461 = sum of:
          0.057404224 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057404224 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.29604656 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
          0.048041876 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048041876 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17738704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We have created software applications that allow users to both author and use Semantic Web metadata. To create and use a layer of semantic content on top of the existing Web, we have (1) implemented a user interface that expedites the task of attributing metadata to resources on the Web, and (2) augmented a Web browser to leverage this semantic metadata to provide relevant information and tasks to the user. This project provides a framework for annotating and reorganizing existing files, pages, and sites on the Web that is similar to Vannevar Bushrsquos original concepts of trail blazing and associative indexing.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  8. Rekabsaz, N. et al.: Toward optimized multimodal concept indexing (2016) 0.16
    0.16492793 = product of:
      0.2473919 = sum of:
        0.09675461 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09675461 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.45938298 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
        0.15063728 = sum of:
          0.08200603 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08200603 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.42292362 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
          0.068631254 = weight(_text_:22 in 2751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.068631254 = score(doc=2751,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17738704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2751, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2751)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Source
    Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al
  9. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.16
    0.16492793 = product of:
      0.2473919 = sum of:
        0.09675461 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09675461 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.45938298 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
        0.15063728 = sum of:
          0.08200603 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08200603 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.42292362 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.068631254 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.068631254 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17738704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
    Source
    Semantic keyword-based search on structured data sources: First COST Action IC1302 International KEYSTONE Conference, IKC 2015, Coimbra, Portugal, September 8-9, 2015. Revised Selected Papers. Eds.: J. Cardoso et al
  10. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.16
    0.16353896 = product of:
      0.24530843 = sum of:
        0.09386349 = product of:
          0.28159046 = sum of:
            0.28159046 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28159046 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.42945817 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050655533 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15144494 = weight(_text_:semantic in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15144494 = score(doc=306,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.71904814 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  11. Zhu, W.Z.; Allen, R.B.: Document clustering using the LSI subspace signature model (2013) 0.16
    0.16167164 = product of:
      0.24250746 = sum of:
        0.116105534 = weight(_text_:semantic in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.116105534 = score(doc=690,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.5512596 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
        0.12640192 = sum of:
          0.08522316 = weight(_text_:indexing in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08522316 = score(doc=690,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.4395151 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
          0.04117875 = weight(_text_:22 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04117875 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17738704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We describe the latent semantic indexing subspace signature model (LSISSM) for semantic content representation of unstructured text. Grounded on singular value decomposition, the model represents terms and documents by the distribution signatures of their statistical contribution across the top-ranking latent concept dimensions. LSISSM matches term signatures with document signatures according to their mapping coherence between latent semantic indexing (LSI) term subspace and LSI document subspace. LSISSM does feature reduction and finds a low-rank approximation of scalable and sparse term-document matrices. Experiments demonstrate that this approach significantly improves the performance of major clustering algorithms such as standard K-means and self-organizing maps compared with the vector space model and the traditional LSI model. The unique contribution ranking mechanism in LSISSM also improves the initialization of standard K-means compared with random seeding procedure, which sometimes causes low efficiency and effectiveness of clustering. A two-stage initialization strategy based on LSISSM significantly reduces the running time of standard K-means procedures.
    Date
    23. 3.2013 13:22:36
    Object
    Latent semantic indexing
  12. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.16
    0.15909657 = sum of:
      0.08045442 = product of:
        0.24136324 = sum of:
          0.24136324 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24136324 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.42945817 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.058052767 = weight(_text_:semantic in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058052767 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
            0.050655533 = queryNorm
          0.2756298 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.020589376 = product of:
        0.04117875 = sum of:
          0.04117875 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04117875 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17738704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  13. Mitri, M.: Combining semantic setworks with multi-attribute utility models : an evaluative data base indexing method (1995) 0.15
    0.14694148 = product of:
      0.22041221 = sum of:
        0.15480739 = weight(_text_:semantic in 6797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15480739 = score(doc=6797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.73501277 = fieldWeight in 6797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6797)
        0.06560482 = product of:
          0.13120964 = sum of:
            0.13120964 = weight(_text_:indexing in 6797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13120964 = score(doc=6797,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050655533 = queryNorm
                0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 6797, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6797)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
  14. Rehurek, R.: Machine learning in text analysis (2011) 0.15
    0.14694148 = product of:
      0.22041221 = sum of:
        0.15480739 = weight(_text_:semantic in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15480739 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.73501277 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
        0.06560482 = product of:
          0.13120964 = sum of:
            0.13120964 = weight(_text_:indexing in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13120964 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050655533 = queryNorm
                0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Aid
    Latent semantic indexing
  15. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.14
    0.14346477 = product of:
      0.21519715 = sum of:
        0.06772823 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06772823 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.32156807 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
        0.14746891 = sum of:
          0.09942703 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09942703 = score(doc=2245,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.5127677 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
          0.048041876 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048041876 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17738704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    To illustrate the theoretical analysis presented by J. Maniez published in Documentaliste 34(1997) nos.4/5 presents some concrete examples drawn for experience of the difficulties increasingly faced in trying to make different indexing languages compatible. Various types of problems may be considered: comparing semantic terms and relationships that compose indexing languages, setting standards for writing and vocabulary, and opposing pre and post coordinated descriptors. Proposes several solutions and discusses the need for further applied research in this area
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Compatibility of indexing languages: fusion, marriage or just living together? Some concrete examples
  16. Krause, J.: Semantic heterogeneity : comparing new semantic web approaches with those of digital libraries (2008) 0.14
    0.13857734 = product of:
      0.20786601 = sum of:
        0.1873645 = weight(_text_:semantic in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1873645 = score(doc=1908,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.88959134 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
        0.020501507 = product of:
          0.041003015 = sum of:
            0.041003015 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041003015 = score(doc=1908,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050655533 = queryNorm
                0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 1908, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1908)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To demonstrate that newer developments in the semantic web community, particularly those based on ontologies (simple knowledge organization system and others) mitigate common arguments from the digital library (DL) community against participation in the Semantic web. Design/methodology/approach - The approach is a semantic web discussion focusing on the weak structure of the Web and the lack of consideration given to the semantic content during indexing. Findings - The points criticised by the semantic web and ontology approaches are the same as those of the DL "Shell model approach" from the mid-1990s, with emphasis on the centrality of its heterogeneity components (used, for example, in vascoda). The Shell model argument began with the "invisible web", necessitating the restructuring of DL approaches. The conclusion is that both approaches fit well together and that the Shell model, with its semantic heterogeneity components, can be reformulated on the semantic web basis. Practical implications - A reinterpretation of the DL approaches of semantic heterogeneity and adapting to standards and tools supported by the W3C should be the best solution. It is therefore recommended that - although most of the semantic web standards are not technologically refined for commercial applications at present - all individual DL developments should be checked for their adaptability to the W3C standards of the semantic web. Originality/value - A unique conceptual analysis of the parallel developments emanating from the digital library and semantic web communities.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Digital libraries and the semantic web: context, applications and research".
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  17. Sauermann, L.; Kiesel, M.; Schumacher, K.; Bernardi, A.: Semantic Desktop (2009) 0.14
    0.13547534 = product of:
      0.203213 = sum of:
        0.17919207 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17919207 = score(doc=2416,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.85078925 = fieldWeight in 2416, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2416)
        0.024020938 = product of:
          0.048041876 = sum of:
            0.048041876 = weight(_text_:22 in 2416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048041876 = score(doc=2416,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17738704 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050655533 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2416, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2416)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag wird gezeigt, wie der Arbeitsplatz der Zukunft aussehen könnte und wo das Semantic Web neue Möglichkeiten eröffnet. Dazu werden Ansätze aus dem Bereich Semantic Web, Knowledge Representation, Desktop-Anwendungen und Visualisierung vorgestellt, die es uns ermöglichen, die bestehenden Daten eines Benutzers neu zu interpretieren und zu verwenden. Dabei bringt die Kombination von Semantic Web und Desktop Computern besondere Vorteile - ein Paradigma, das unter dem Titel Semantic Desktop bekannt ist. Die beschriebenen Möglichkeiten der Applikationsintegration sind aber nicht auf den Desktop beschränkt, sondern können genauso in Web-Anwendungen Verwendung finden.
    Date
    3. 1.2012 16:00:22
    Object
    Semantic Desktop
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  18. Bordoni, L.; Pazienza, M.T.: Documents automatic indexing in an environmental domain (1997) 0.13
    0.13130128 = product of:
      0.19695193 = sum of:
        0.06772823 = weight(_text_:semantic in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06772823 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.32156807 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
        0.1292237 = sum of:
          0.081181824 = weight(_text_:indexing in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.081181824 = score(doc=530,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.41867304 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
          0.048041876 = weight(_text_:22 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048041876 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17738704 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050655533 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, in HIRMA (Hypertextual Information Retrieval Managed by ARIOSTO), to the problem of document indexing by referring to a system which incorporates natural language processing techniques to determine the subject of the text of documents and to associate them with relevant semantic indexes. Describes briefly the overall system, details of its implementation on a corpus of scientific abstracts related to environmental topics and experimental evidence of the system's behaviour. Analyzes in detail an experiment designed to evaluate the system's retrieval ability in terms of recall and precision
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.1, S.17-28
  19. Ding, C.H.Q.: ¬A probabilistic model for Latent Semantic Indexing (2005) 0.13
    0.1308032 = product of:
      0.19620478 = sum of:
        0.1535932 = weight(_text_:semantic in 3459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1535932 = score(doc=3459,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.7292479 = fieldWeight in 3459, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3459)
        0.04261158 = product of:
          0.08522316 = sum of:
            0.08522316 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08522316 = score(doc=3459,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050655533 = queryNorm
                0.4395151 = fieldWeight in 3459, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI), when applied to semantic space built an text collections, improves information retrieval, information filtering, and word sense disambiguation. A new dual probability model based an the similarity concepts is introduced to provide deeper understanding of LSI. Semantic associations can be quantitatively characterized by their statistical significance, the likelihood. Semantic dimensions containing redundant and noisy information can be separated out and should be ignored because their negative contribution to the overall statistical significance. LSI is the optimal solution of the model. The peak in the likelihood curve indicates the existence of an intrinsic semantic dimension. The importance of LSI dimensions follows the Zipf-distribution, indicating that LSI dimensions represent latent concepts. Document frequency of words follows the Zipf distribution, and the number of distinct words follows log-normal distribution. Experiments an five standard document collections confirm and illustrate the analysis.
    Object
    Latent Semantic Indexing
  20. Kokiopoulou, E.; Saad, Y.: Polynomial filtering in Latent semantic indexing for information retrieval (2004) 0.13
    0.12987915 = product of:
      0.1948187 = sum of:
        0.13683169 = weight(_text_:semantic in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13683169 = score(doc=4080,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21061863 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050655533 = queryNorm
            0.64966565 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
        0.05798702 = product of:
          0.11597404 = sum of:
            0.11597404 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11597404 = score(doc=4080,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19390269 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050655533 = queryNorm
                0.59810436 = fieldWeight in 4080, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Object
    Latent Semantic Indexing

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 6217
  • m 650
  • el 467
  • s 309
  • x 78
  • r 59
  • b 46
  • i 26
  • n 17
  • p 13
  • ? 10
  • d 6
  • z 3
  • u 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications