Search (3660 results, page 1 of 183)

  1. Three systems are substantially enhanced (1995) 0.19
    0.18844156 = product of:
      0.37688312 = sum of:
        0.37688312 = sum of:
          0.32487747 = weight(_text_:iq in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.32487747 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04798058 = queryNorm
              0.7736144 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
          0.05200565 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05200565 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16801982 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04798058 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    For about 10 years, systems such as STATUS, CAIRS and INMAGIC have offered the ability to search for any word in a collection of unstructured text. Until recently, only librarians and documentalists have been interested, but free text retrieval is increasingly valued in the business world in general and all 3 systems are striving for a wider market by adding other features to their established core competence. Illustrates this trend with particualr reference to: STATUS/IQ; CAIRS; TMS and DB/TextWorks (the successor to InMagic Plus)
    Date
    22. 2.1996 10:18:16
  2. Stvilia, B.; Gasser, L.; Twidale, M.B.; Smith, L.C.: ¬A framework for information quality assessment (2007) 0.18
    0.18274358 = product of:
      0.36548716 = sum of:
        0.36548716 = product of:
          0.7309743 = sum of:
            0.7309743 = weight(_text_:iq in 610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.7309743 = score(doc=610,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                1.7406324 = fieldWeight in 610, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=610)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    One cannot manage information quality (IQ) without first being able to measure it meaningfully and establishing a causal connection between the source of IQ change, the IQ problem types, the types of activities affected, and their implications. In this article we propose a general IQ assessment framework. In contrast to context-specific IQ assessment models, which usually focus on a few variables determined by local needs, our framework consists of comprehensive typologies of IQ problems, related activities, and a taxonomy of IQ dimensions organized in a systematic way based on sound theories and practices. The framework can be used as a knowledge resource and as a guide for developing IQ measurement models for many different settings. The framework was validated and refined by developing specific IQ measurement models for two large-scale collections of two large classes of information objects: Simple Dublin Core records and online encyclopedia articles.
  3. Dawson announces Information Quest (1997) 0.14
    0.14213389 = product of:
      0.28426778 = sum of:
        0.28426778 = product of:
          0.56853557 = sum of:
            0.56853557 = weight(_text_:iq in 7459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.56853557 = score(doc=7459,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                1.3538252 = fieldWeight in 7459, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information Quest (IQ), launched by Dawson, Massachussetts, provides one stop worldwide access to scientific and technical, medical and business periodicals, in electronic form, through the Internet. IQ allows searching on any word within articles, searches the original text of articles and delivers the full text of the article, including graphics, to the user's desktop. IQ includes a database of over 6 million contents table entries from over 12.000 periodicals dating back to 1990 and, through existing relationships, to other periodicals. Electronic periodicals are being added as fast as publishers are making them available. IQ features full text searching, IP security, and individual and group user password aministration, WWW based periodicals ordering, and WWW based subscription management and ordering from FAXON ACQUIRE
  4. Stvilia, B.; Twidale, M.B.; Smith, L.C.; Gasser, L.: Information quality work organization in wikipedia (2008) 0.13
    0.13430391 = product of:
      0.26860783 = sum of:
        0.26860783 = product of:
          0.53721565 = sum of:
            0.53721565 = weight(_text_:iq in 1859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.53721565 = score(doc=1859,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                1.2792447 = fieldWeight in 1859, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1859)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The classic problem within the information quality (IQ) research and practice community has been the problem of defining IQ. It has been found repeatedly that IQ is context sensitive and cannot be described, measured, and assured with a single model. There is a need for empirical case studies of IQ work in different systems to develop a systematic knowledge that can then inform and guide the construction of context-specific IQ models. This article analyzes the organization of IQ assurance work in a large-scale, open, collaborative encyclopedia - Wikipedia. What is special about Wikipedia as a resource is that the quality discussions and processes are strongly connected to the data itself and are accessible to the general public. This openness makes it particularly easy for researchers to study a particular kind of collaborative work that is highly distributed and that has a particularly substantial focus, not just on error detection but also on error correction. We believe that the study of those evolving debates and processes and of the IQ assurance model as a whole has useful implications for the improvement of quality in other more conventional databases.
  5. Ewers, A.: ¬A review of new developments in text retrieval systems (1994) 0.12
    0.12309158 = product of:
      0.24618316 = sum of:
        0.24618316 = product of:
          0.4923663 = sum of:
            0.4923663 = weight(_text_:iq in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4923663 = score(doc=1063,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                1.1724472 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports a review of current and planned developments of the leading suppliers of text retrieval software, aimed at trying to establish trends in the industry. The products evaluated are those from minicomputer and mainframe computer backgrounds and can be best described as fully functional text information management systems, the majority of which operate in inverted file structures which index every word. The survey was conducted by means of interviews with senior executives of the suppliers concerned and the suppliers and systems reviewed were: Information Dimensions (BASISplus); BRS Dataware (BRS/Search); Excalibur Technologies (EFS); Status/IQ (Status/IQ); and Verity (TOPIC)
    Object
    Status/IQ
  6. Visschedijk, A.; Gibb, F.: Unconventional text retrieval systems (1993) 0.12
    0.12182905 = product of:
      0.2436581 = sum of:
        0.2436581 = product of:
          0.4873162 = sum of:
            0.4873162 = weight(_text_:iq in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4873162 = score(doc=4275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                1.1604216 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of some of the more unconventional text retrieval systems, emphasising those which have been made commercially available.; Methaphor; SIMPR; STATUS/IQ; TCS; TINA AND TOPIC
  7. Arazy, O.; Kopak, R.: On the measurability of information quality (2011) 0.12
    0.12182905 = product of:
      0.2436581 = sum of:
        0.2436581 = product of:
          0.4873162 = sum of:
            0.4873162 = weight(_text_:iq in 4135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4873162 = score(doc=4135,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                1.1604216 = fieldWeight in 4135, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4135)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The notion of information quality (IQ) has been investigated extensively in recent years. Much of this research has been aimed at conceptualizing IQ and its underlying dimensions (e.g., accuracy, completeness) and at developing instruments for measuring these quality dimensions. However, less attention has been given to the measurability of IQ. The objective of this study is to explore the extent to which a set of IQ dimensions-accuracy, completeness, objectivity, and representation-lend themselves to reliable measurement. By reliable measurement, we refer to the degree to which independent assessors are able to agree when rating objects on these various dimensions. Our study reveals that multiple assessors tend to agree more on certain dimensions (e.g., accuracy) while finding it more difficult to agree on others (e.g., completeness). We argue that differences in measurability stem from properties inherent to the quality dimension (i.e., the availability of heuristics that make the assessment more tangible) as well as on assessors' reliance on these cues. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
  8. Gardner, H.: Intelligenzen : Die Vielfalt des menschlichen Geistes (2002) 0.12
    0.11777597 = product of:
      0.23555194 = sum of:
        0.23555194 = sum of:
          0.20304841 = weight(_text_:iq in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20304841 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04798058 = queryNorm
              0.483509 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
          0.03250353 = weight(_text_:22 in 244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03250353 = score(doc=244,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16801982 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04798058 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 244, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 11:09:53
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Gehirn & Geist 2002, H.3, S.96 (C. Tertel: "Zu Recht gelten Picasso und Freud als kluge Köpfe. Doch wussten Sie, dass Ersterer in schulischer und Letzterer in musikalischer Hinsicht alles andere als Intelligenzbestien waren? Offenbar gibt es verschiedene Arten von Intelligenz. Ihnen geht der bekannte Harvard-Psychologe Howard Gardner in seinem neuen Buch auf den Grund. Seit über zwanzig Jahren wehrt er sich gegen die gängige Praxis, Menschen über IQ-Tests in schlau und dumm zu unterteilen. Stattdessen gesteht er uns allen verschiedene Intelligenzen zu: unter anderem eine sprachliche, eine musikalische und eine körperlich-kinästhetische. Die verschiedenen Anlagen seien bei jedem Menschen unterschiedlich stark ausgeprägt und könnten - je nach Situation und Aufgabe - einzeln oder im Zusammenspiel in Erscheinung treten. Gardners neues Buch liefert praxisnahe Denkanstöße, wie wir die Kenntnis über unsere unterschiedlichen Stärken Gewinn bringend in Schule, Bildung und Wirtschaft nutzen können. Hilfreich sind hier nicht zuletzt der ausführliche Anhang mit Tipps zu Lehrmaterialien, Newslettern und Kontaktadressen. Unterm Strich eine Lektüre für alle, die sich näher mit der Auffächerung unseres Geistes befassen möchten - aber kein Buch für solche Leser, die ihre Stärken anhand von Gardners Typologie einordnen und fördern möchten. Dies jedoch verspricht irreführenderweise der Klappentext!"). -
  9. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.095708 = sum of:
      0.07620588 = product of:
        0.22861764 = sum of:
          0.22861764 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22861764 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4067799 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04798058 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.019502118 = product of:
        0.039004236 = sum of:
          0.039004236 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039004236 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16801982 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04798058 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  10. Nori, R.: Web searching and navigation : age, intelligence, and familiarity (2020) 0.09
    0.08792255 = product of:
      0.1758451 = sum of:
        0.1758451 = product of:
          0.3516902 = sum of:
            0.3516902 = weight(_text_:iq in 5945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3516902 = score(doc=5945,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                0.83746225 = fieldWeight in 5945, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In using the Internet to solve everyday problems, older adults tend to find fewer correct answers compared to younger adults. Some authors have argued that these differences could be explained by age-related decline. The present study aimed to analyze the relationship between web-searching navigation and users' age, considering the Intelligence Quotient (IQ) and frequency of Internet and personal computer use. The intent was to identify differences due to age and not to other variables (that is, cognitive decline, expertise with the tool). Eighteen students (18-30?years) and 18 older adults (60-75?years) took part in the experiment. Inclusion criteria were the frequent use of computers and a web-searching activity; the older adults performed the Mini-Mental State Examination to exclude cognitive impairment. Participants were requested to perform the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test 2nd ed. to measure their IQ level, and nine everyday web-searching tasks of differing complexity. The results showed that older participants spent more time on solving tasks than younger participants, but with the same accuracy as young people. Furthermore, nonverbal IQ improved performance in terms of time among the older participants. Age did not influence web-searching behavior in users with normal expertise and intelligence.
  11. Web-2.0-Dienste als Ergänzung zu algorithmischen Suchmaschinen (2008) 0.09
    0.086146146 = product of:
      0.17229229 = sum of:
        0.17229229 = product of:
          0.34458458 = sum of:
            0.34458458 = weight(_text_:iq in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.34458458 = score(doc=4323,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                0.820542 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Mit sozialen Suchdiensten - wie z. B. Yahoo Clever, Lycos iQ oder Mister Wong - ist eine Ergänzung und teilweise sogar eine Konkurrenz zu den bisherigen Ansätzen in der Web-Suche entstanden. Während Google und Co. automatisch generierte Trefferlisten bieten, binden soziale Suchdienste die Anwender zu Generierung der Suchergebnisse in den Suchprozess ein. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird in diesem Buch der Frage nachgegangen, inwieweit soziale Suchdienste mit traditionellen Suchmaschinen konkurrieren oder diese qualitativ ergänzen können. Der vorliegende Band beleuchtet die hier aufgeworfene Fragestellung aus verschiedenen Perspektiven, um auf die Bedeutung von sozialen Suchdiensten zu schließen.
    Object
    Lycos iQ
  12. Seehaus, S.: Können Suchmaschinen von Sozialer Software profitieren? (2008) 0.08
    0.08121937 = product of:
      0.16243874 = sum of:
        0.16243874 = product of:
          0.32487747 = sum of:
            0.32487747 = weight(_text_:iq in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.32487747 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                0.7736144 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen eines Projekts gingen Stu­dierende an der HAW Hamburg für ihre Auftraggeber Lycos Europe und T-Online der Frage nach, wie sich Inhalte aus sozialen Suchdiensten in die algorithmische Suche einbinden lassen. Dazu analysierten und verglichen sie die Vor- und Nachteile der Systeme, die Relevanz der Sucher­gebnisse, die Benutzerfreundlichkeit sowie die Qualität der Inhalte. Für soziale Software ergaben sich daraus bedeutende Verbesserungspotentiale. Der Text beschreibt die Ergebnisse und die Empfehlungen für Lycos IQ.
  13. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.08
    0.07975667 = sum of:
      0.063504905 = product of:
        0.1905147 = sum of:
          0.1905147 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1905147 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.4067799 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04798058 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.016251765 = product of:
        0.03250353 = sum of:
          0.03250353 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03250353 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16801982 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04798058 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  14. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.08
    0.07620588 = product of:
      0.15241176 = sum of:
        0.15241176 = product of:
          0.45723528 = sum of:
            0.45723528 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.45723528 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4067799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  15. Zhang, Y.; Trace, C.B.: ¬The quality of health and wellness self-tracking data : a consumer perspective (2022) 0.07
    0.07178846 = product of:
      0.14357692 = sum of:
        0.14357692 = product of:
          0.28715384 = sum of:
            0.28715384 = weight(_text_:iq in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28715384 = score(doc=459,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                0.683785 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information quality (IQ) is key to users' satisfaction with information systems. Understanding what IQ means to users can effectively inform system improvement. Existing inquiries into self-tracking data quality primarily focus on accuracy. Interviewing 20 consumers who had self-tracked health indicators for at least 6 months, we identified eight dimensions that consumers apply to evaluate self-tracking data quality: value-added, accuracy, completeness, accessibility, ease of understanding, trustworthiness, aesthetics, and invasiveness. These dimensions fell into four categories-intrinsic, contextual, representational, and accessibility-suggesting that consumers judge self-tracking data quality not only based on the data's inherent quality but also considering tasks at hand, the clarity of data representation, and data accessibility. We also found that consumers' self-tracking data quality judgments are shaped primarily by their goals or motivations, subjective experience with tracked activities, mental models of how systems work, self-tracking tools' reputation, cost, and design, and domain knowledge and intuition, but less by more objective criteria such as scientific research results, validated devices, or consultation with experts. Future studies should develop and validate a scale for measuring consumers' perceptions of self-tracking data quality and commit efforts to develop technologies and training materials to enhance consumers' ability to evaluate data quality.
  16. Smeaton, A.F.: Prospects for intelligent, language-based information retrieval (1991) 0.07
    0.071066946 = product of:
      0.14213389 = sum of:
        0.14213389 = product of:
          0.28426778 = sum of:
            0.28426778 = weight(_text_:iq in 3700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28426778 = score(doc=3700,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41994753 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                0.6769126 = fieldWeight in 3700, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.752448 = idf(docFreq=18, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3700)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Current approaches to text retrieval based on indexing by words or index terms and on retrieving by specifying a Boolean combination of keywords are well known, as are their limitations. Statistical approaches to retrieval, as exemplified in commercial products like STATUS/IQ and Personal Librarian, are slightly better but still have their own weaknesses. Approaches to the indexing and retrieval of text based on techniques of automatic natural language processing (NLP) may soon start to realise their potential in terms of improving the quality and effectiveness of information retrieval. Examines some of the current attempts at using various NLP techniques in both the indexing and retrieval operations
  17. #220 0.06
    0.06435371 = product of:
      0.12870742 = sum of:
        0.12870742 = product of:
          0.25741485 = sum of:
            0.25741485 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25741485 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16801982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  18. #1387 0.06
    0.06435371 = product of:
      0.12870742 = sum of:
        0.12870742 = product of:
          0.25741485 = sum of:
            0.25741485 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25741485 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16801982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  19. #2103 0.06
    0.06435371 = product of:
      0.12870742 = sum of:
        0.12870742 = product of:
          0.25741485 = sum of:
            0.25741485 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25741485 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16801982 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  20. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.06
    0.063504905 = product of:
      0.12700981 = sum of:
        0.12700981 = product of:
          0.3810294 = sum of:
            0.3810294 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3810294 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4067799 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04798058 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

Languages

Types

  • a 3059
  • m 345
  • el 161
  • s 140
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications