Search (8819 results, page 1 of 441)

0.2502824 = product of:
  0.37542358 = sum of:
    0.31143922 = weight(_text_:interest in 1040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31143922 = score(doc=1040,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        1.2420646 = fieldWeight in 1040, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1040)
    0.06398436 = product of:
      0.12796871 = sum of:
        0.12796871 = weight(_text_:classification in 1040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12796871 = score(doc=1040,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.7961767 = fieldWeight in 1040, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1040)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Object

Reader interest classification

0.23778866 = product of:
  0.356683 = sum of:
    0.31143922 = weight(_text_:interest in 5263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31143922 = score(doc=5263,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        1.2420646 = fieldWeight in 5263, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5263)
    0.045243774 = product of:
      0.09048755 = sum of:
        0.09048755 = weight(_text_:classification in 5263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09048755 = score(doc=5263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 5263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Object

Reader interest classification

0.18094924 = product of:
  0.27142385 = sum of:
    0.21543755 = weight(_text_:interest in 5548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21543755 = score(doc=5548,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.859196 = fieldWeight in 5548, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5548)
    0.05598631 = product of:
      0.11197262 = sum of:
        0.11197262 = weight(_text_:classification in 5548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11197262 = score(doc=5548,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.69665456 = fieldWeight in 5548, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5548)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

A review of the current use of reader-interest classification since 1980 as an alternative arrangement of bookstock to traditional classification. Reader-interest classification is known by a variety of names and used in many countries. With a current trend to make libraries more accessible and user-friendly, librarians are experimenting with reader-interest classification. The paper discusses the reasons for using it, principles, catalog aspects, what it brings together and separates, implementation, arrangement and presentation of the bookstock, the kind and size of library where it is in use and the outlook for its continued use. Recent studies and surveys are also considered.

Object

Reader interest classification

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.19, nos.3/4

Source

Classification: options and opportunities. Ed.: A.R. Thomas

0.17697638 = product of:
  0.26546457 = sum of:
    0.22022079 = weight(_text_:interest in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22022079 = score(doc=557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.8782723 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
    0.045243774 = product of:
      0.09048755 = sum of:
        0.09048755 = weight(_text_:classification in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09048755 = score(doc=557,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.5629819 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Object

Reader interest classification

0.15485434 = product of:
  0.2322815 = sum of:
    0.1926932 = weight(_text_:interest in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1926932 = score(doc=1973,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.7684883 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
    0.039588302 = product of:
      0.079176605 = sum of:
        0.079176605 = weight(_text_:classification in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.079176605 = score(doc=1973,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

In the recent years, several libraries in the United States have been experimenting with Book Industry Standards and Communications (BISAC), the classification system of the book industry, as an alternative to the Dewey Decimal Classification. Although rarely discussed, these cases of implementation of BISAC arguably resemble other past cases of replacement of traditional classifications that received the name of reader-interest classifications. In this article, a comparison of the BISAC cases to the previous cases of reader-interest classifications is taken in order to determine if the current application of BISAC to libraries is susceptible to the same problems, dangers, and ends as occurred in the past.

Object

Reader interest classification

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.2, S.137-155

0.15253174 = product of:
  0.22879761 = sum of:
    0.110110395 = weight(_text_:interest in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.110110395 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.43913615 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
    0.11868721 = sum of:
      0.06398436 = weight(_text_:classification in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06398436 = score(doc=5118,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.39808834 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
      0.054702852 = weight(_text_:22 in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.054702852 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Reviews the consequences of the traditional division of library staff into Technical Services and Reader Services and if decreased interest in cataloguing by library managers. Notes ways in which non cataloguers have had limited involvement in cataloguing. Describes different forms of a holistic approach to library practice and suggests advantages of a holistic work plan. Considers problems of a holistic work plan, advances some solutions and identifies implications for education in cataloguing in library schools

Footnote

Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Cataloging and classification: trends, transformations, teaching, and training."

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.5-22

0.14572906 = product of:
  0.21859358 = sum of:
    0.18466075 = weight(_text_:interest in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18466075 = score(doc=780,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.7364537 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
    0.03393283 = product of:
      0.06786566 = sum of:
        0.06786566 = weight(_text_:classification in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06786566 = score(doc=780,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

During the last century, the concept of reader-interest classifications and its related terminology have shown a well-established presence and commonly-agreed characteristics in the literature and other classification discourses. During the period 1952-1995, it was not unusual to find works, projects, and discourses using a common core of characteristics and terms to refer to a recognizable type of projects involving alternative classifications to the DDC and other traditional practices in libraries. However, although similar projects and characteristics are being used until the present day, such as those of implementation of BISAC in public libraries, the use of reader-interest classification-related terms and references have drastically declined since 1995. The present work attempts to overview the concept and terminology of reader-interest classifications in a historical perspective emphasizing the transformation of the concept and its remaining characteristics in time.

Object

Reader interest classification

0.14210257 = product of:
  0.21315385 = sum of:
    0.16516559 = weight(_text_:interest in 7213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16516559 = score(doc=7213,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.6587042 = fieldWeight in 7213, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7213)
    0.04798827 = product of:
      0.09597654 = sum of:
        0.09597654 = weight(_text_:classification in 7213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09597654 = score(doc=7213,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.5971325 = fieldWeight in 7213, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7213)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Reports recent changes to the Library of Congress Classification of interest to Judaica librarians and extracted from issues of the LoC Additions and Changes

0.13746183 = product of:
  0.20619273 = sum of:
    0.16516559 = weight(_text_:interest in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16516559 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.6587042 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
    0.04102714 = product of:
      0.08205428 = sum of:
        0.08205428 = weight(_text_:22 in 4248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08205428 = score(doc=4248,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4248, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4248)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Continuation of a regular semiannual series reporting a selection of recent scholarly and general reference books of interest to reference staff as an aid to selection and acquisitions

Date

29.12.1999 13:22:36

0.13273229 = product of:
  0.19909842 = sum of:
    0.16516559 = weight(_text_:interest in 394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16516559 = score(doc=394,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.6587042 = fieldWeight in 394, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=394)
    0.03393283 = product of:
      0.06786566 = sum of:
        0.06786566 = weight(_text_:classification in 394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06786566 = score(doc=394,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 394, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=394)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Object

Reader interest classification

0.13256618 = product of:
  0.19884928 = sum of:
    0.13625467 = weight(_text_:interest in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13625467 = score(doc=705,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.54340327 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
    0.06259461 = product of:
      0.12518921 = sum of:
        0.12518921 = weight(_text_:classification in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12518921 = score(doc=705,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.7788835 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This article offers a basic introduction to classification in the context of librarianship in the United States with an aim toward filling gaps in formal education and practical experience. The article defines the concept of classification and discusses the goals and purposes of classification, both functional and intellectual. Overviews of two common classification systems frequently used in U.S. libraries are presented: Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), Library of Congress Classification (LCC), as well as an introduction to a group of classifications known as "reader-interest classifications."

Content

Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1881008. Teil eines Themenheftes: Cataloging and Classification: Back to Basics

Object

Reader Interest Classification

Source

Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.2/3, S.203-224

0.12441054 = product of:
  0.18661581 = sum of:
    0.13763799 = weight(_text_:interest in 1122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13763799 = score(doc=1122,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.54892015 = fieldWeight in 1122, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1122)
    0.048977822 = product of:
      0.097955644 = sum of:
        0.097955644 = weight(_text_:classification in 1122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.097955644 = score(doc=1122,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.6094458 = fieldWeight in 1122, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Footnote

The workshop papers will be published in final versions in mid-2002 by Information Today as Advances in Classification Research; vol 12

0.12399262 = product of:
  0.18598893 = sum of:
    0.13763799 = weight(_text_:interest in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13763799 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.54892015 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
    0.04835095 = product of:
      0.0967019 = sum of:
        0.0967019 = weight(_text_:22 in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0967019 = score(doc=183,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Considers the role and nature of current awareness services with particular reference to the impact of electronic media, the Internet and WWW on the 5 basic components of these services: databases; user interest profiles; notifications; feedback and document delivery

Date

22. 2.1999 17:50:37

Source

Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.4, S.277-279

0.121806756 = product of:
  0.18271013 = sum of:
    0.16857144 = weight(_text_:interest in 1306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16857144 = score(doc=1306,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.6722872 = fieldWeight in 1306, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1306)
    0.014138679 = product of:
      0.028277358 = sum of:
        0.028277358 = weight(_text_:classification in 1306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028277358 = score(doc=1306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.17593184 = fieldWeight in 1306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1306)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

How to provide users a positive experience during interaction with information (i.e., the "Information eXperience" (IX)) is still an open question. As a starting point, this work investigates how the emotion of interest can be influenced by modifying the complexity of the information presented to users. The appraisal theory of interest suggests a "sweet spot" where interest will be at its peak: information that is novel and complex yet still comprehensible. This "sweet spot" is approximated using two studies. Study One develops a computational model of textual complexity founded on psycholinguistic theory on processing difficulty. The model was trained and tested on 12,420 articles, achieving a classification performance of 90.87% on two classes of complexity. Study Two puts the model to its ultimate test: Its application to change the user's IX. Using 18 news articles the influence of complexity on interest and its appraisals is unveiled. A structural equation model shows a positive influence of complexity on interest, yet a negative influence of comprehensibility, confirming a seemingly paradoxical relationship between complexity and interest. By showing when complexity becomes interesting, this paper shows how information systems can use the model of textual complexity to construct an interesting IX.

0.12142134 = product of:
  0.182132 = sum of:
    0.16516559 = weight(_text_:interest in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16516559 = score(doc=3626,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.6587042 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
    0.016966416 = product of:
      0.03393283 = sum of:
        0.03393283 = weight(_text_:classification in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03393283 = score(doc=3626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The concept of reader-interest classifications and its related terminology have shown a well-established presence and common characteristics in the knowledge organization literature for more than half a century. During the period 1952-1995, it was not unusual to find works, projects and discourses using a common core of characteristics and terms to refer to a recognizable type of projects involving alternative classifications to the DDC and other traditional practices in libraries. The use of reader-interest classification related terms and references drastically declined since 1995, although similar projects and characteristics are being used until the present day such as those of implementation of BISAC in American public libraries. The present paper attempts to overview the concept and terminology of reader-interest classifications in a historical perspective emphasizing the transformation of the concept and its remaining characteristics in time.

0.11997249 = product of:
  0.17995873 = sum of:
    0.080158204 = product of:
      0.2404746 = sum of:
        0.2404746 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2404746 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.427877 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.09980053 = sum of:
      0.058773387 = weight(_text_:classification in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.058773387 = score(doc=562,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.3656675 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.04102714 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04102714 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.11889433 = product of:
  0.1783415 = sum of:
    0.15571961 = weight(_text_:interest in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15571961 = score(doc=1774,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.6210323 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
    0.022621887 = product of:
      0.045243774 = sum of:
        0.045243774 = weight(_text_:classification in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045243774 = score(doc=1774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: ASTIN, J.: Cheshire: Alternative arrangement and beyond; READER, D.: User orientation in a Hertfordshire branch; CHANDLER, D.: Self-service-libraries: providing for the smaller community in Cambridgeshire; BETTS, D.: Reader interest categories in Surrey; DONBROSKI, L.: Categorisation at East Sussex County Library; McCARTHY, A.: Burning issues: stock appeal in Sunderland; MORSON, I. u. M. PERRY: Two-tier and total: stock arrangement in Brent

Object

Reader interest classification

0.118548766 = product of:
  0.17782314 = sum of:
    0.068818994 = weight(_text_:interest in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068818994 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.27446008 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
    0.10900415 = sum of:
      0.07481486 = weight(_text_:classification in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07481486 = score(doc=3483,freq=14.0), product of:
          0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.46547192 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
            3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
              14.0 = termFreq=14.0
            3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
      0.034189284 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.034189284 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17673394 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046903 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

Classification is an activity that transcends time and space and that bridges the divisions between different languages and cultures, including the divisions between academic disciplines. Classificatory activity, however, serves different purposes in different situations. Classifications for infonnation retrieval can be called "professional" classifications and classifications in other fields can be called "naïve" classifications because they are developed by people who have no particular interest in classificatory issues. The general purpose of naïve classification systems is to discover new knowledge. In contrast, the general purpose of information retrieval classifications is to classify pre-existing knowledge. Different classificatory purposes may thus inform systems that are intended to span the cultural specifics of the globalized information society. This paper builds an previous research into the purposes and characteristics of naïve classifications. It describes some of the relationships between the purpose and context of a naive classification, the units of analysis used in it, and the theory that the context and the units of analysis imply.

Footnote

Vgl.: Jacob, E.K.: Proposal for a classification of classifications built on Beghtol's distinction between "Naïve Classification" and "Professional Classification". In: Knowledge organization. 37(2010) no.2, S.111-120.

Pages

S.19-22

0.11841881 = product of:
  0.17762822 = sum of:
    0.13763799 = weight(_text_:interest in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13763799 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.54892015 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
    0.039990224 = product of:
      0.07998045 = sum of:
        0.07998045 = weight(_text_:classification in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07998045 = score(doc=4184,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

This book contains a series of essays explaining cataloguing rules and classification schedules on a broad range of subjects. It was intended mostly for cataloguers but it may be of interest to reference librarians

0.11841881 = product of:
  0.17762822 = sum of:
    0.13763799 = weight(_text_:interest in 7630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13763799 = score(doc=7630,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25074318 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05046903 = queryNorm
        0.54892015 = fieldWeight in 7630, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.9682584 = idf(docFreq=835, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7630)
    0.039990224 = product of:
      0.07998045 = sum of:
        0.07998045 = weight(_text_:classification in 7630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07998045 = score(doc=7630,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16072905 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046903 = queryNorm
            0.49761042 = fieldWeight in 7630, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7630)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract

The Library of Congress maintains the DDC and updates the system in the interest of its national and international relationships to 200.000 libraries in 135 countries despite of the fact that it has its own classification system