Search (3651 results, page 1 of 183)

  1. Kramer, A.: Datendetektive : Volltextsuchmaschinen trotzen dem Chaos auf der Festplatte (2004) 0.10
    0.09632044 = product of:
      0.19264089 = sum of:
        0.19264089 = product of:
          0.38528177 = sum of:
            0.38528177 = weight(_text_:1.7 in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.38528177 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.45323527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.8500701 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    SERglobalBrain 1.7
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.09
    0.09400407 = sum of:
      0.07484916 = product of:
        0.22454746 = sum of:
          0.22454746 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.22454746 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.39953783 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047126364 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.019154916 = product of:
        0.03830983 = sum of:
          0.03830983 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03830983 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047126364 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Torra, V.; Miyamoto, S.; Lanau, S.: Exploration of textual document archives using a fuzzy hierarchical clustering algorithm in the GAMBAL system (2005) 0.08
    0.08428039 = product of:
      0.16856077 = sum of:
        0.16856077 = product of:
          0.33712155 = sum of:
            0.33712155 = weight(_text_:1.7 in 1028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.33712155 = score(doc=1028,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.45323527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.74381137 = fieldWeight in 1028, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1028)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet, together with the large amount of textual information available in document archives, has increased the relevance of information retrieval related tools. In this work we present an extension of the Gambal system for clustering and visualization of documents based on fuzzy clustering techniques. The tool allows to structure the set of documents in a hierarchical way (using a fuzzy hierarchical structure) and represent this structure in a graphical interface (a 3D sphere) over which the user can navigate. Gambal allows the analysis of the documents and the computation of their similarity not only on the basis of the syntactic similarity between words but also based on a dictionary (Wordnet 1.7) and latent semantics analysis.
  4. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.08
    0.07833673 = sum of:
      0.0623743 = product of:
        0.1871229 = sum of:
          0.1871229 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1871229 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.39953783 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047126364 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.01596243 = product of:
        0.03192486 = sum of:
          0.03192486 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03192486 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047126364 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  5. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.07
    0.07484916 = product of:
      0.14969832 = sum of:
        0.14969832 = product of:
          0.44909492 = sum of:
            0.44909492 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.44909492 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39953783 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  6. Suchanek, F.M.; Kasneci, G.; Weikum, G.: YAGO: a large ontology from Wikipedia and WordNet (2008) 0.07
    0.07224033 = product of:
      0.14448066 = sum of:
        0.14448066 = product of:
          0.28896132 = sum of:
            0.28896132 = weight(_text_:1.7 in 3404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28896132 = score(doc=3404,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.45323527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.6375526 = fieldWeight in 3404, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3404)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents YAGO, a large ontology with high coverage and precision. YAGO has been automatically derived from Wikipedia and WordNet. It comprises entities and relations, and currently contains more than 1.7 million entities and 15 million facts. These include the taxonomic Is-A hierarchy as well as semantic relations between entities. The facts for YAGO have been extracted from the category system and the infoboxes of Wikipedia and have been combined with taxonomic relations from WordNet. Type checking techniques help us keep YAGO's precision at 95%-as proven by an extensive evaluation study. YAGO is based on a clean logical model with a decidable consistency. Furthermore, it allows representing n-ary relations in a natural way while maintaining compatibility with RDFS. A powerful query model facilitates access to YAGO's data.
  7. #220 0.06
    0.063208 = product of:
      0.126416 = sum of:
        0.126416 = product of:
          0.252832 = sum of:
            0.252832 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.252832 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  8. #1387 0.06
    0.063208 = product of:
      0.126416 = sum of:
        0.126416 = product of:
          0.252832 = sum of:
            0.252832 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.252832 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  9. #2103 0.06
    0.063208 = product of:
      0.126416 = sum of:
        0.126416 = product of:
          0.252832 = sum of:
            0.252832 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.252832 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 20:02:22
  10. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.06
    0.0623743 = product of:
      0.1247486 = sum of:
        0.1247486 = product of:
          0.3742458 = sum of:
            0.3742458 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3742458 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39953783 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  11. Lisée, C.; Larivière, V.; Archambault, E.: Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information : a bibliometric analysis (2008) 0.06
    0.060200274 = product of:
      0.12040055 = sum of:
        0.12040055 = product of:
          0.2408011 = sum of:
            0.2408011 = weight(_text_:1.7 in 2356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2408011 = score(doc=2356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.45323527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.5312938 = fieldWeight in 2356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2356)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    While several authors have argued that conference proceedings are an important source of scientific knowledge, the extent of their importance has not been measured in a systematic manner. This article examines the scientific impact and aging of conference proceedings compared to those of scientific literature in general. It shows that the relative importance of proceedings is diminishing over time and currently represents only 1.7% of references made in the natural sciences and engineering, and 2.5% in the social sciences and humanities. Although the scientific impact of proceedings is losing ground to other types of scientific literature in nearly all fields, it has grown from 8% of the references in engineering papers in the early 1980s to its current 10%. Proceedings play a particularly important role in computer sciences, where they account for close to 20% of the references. This article also shows that not unexpectedly, proceedings age faster than cited scientific literature in general. The evidence thus shows that proceedings have a relatively limited scientific impact, on average representing only about 2% of total citations, that their relative importance is shrinking, and that they become obsolete faster than the scientific literature in general.
  12. Zhu, Y.; Quan, L.; Chen, P.-Y.; Kim, M.C.; Che, C.: Predicting coauthorship using bibliographic network embedding (2023) 0.06
    0.060200274 = product of:
      0.12040055 = sum of:
        0.12040055 = product of:
          0.2408011 = sum of:
            0.2408011 = weight(_text_:1.7 in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2408011 = score(doc=917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.45323527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.5312938 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Coauthorship prediction applies predictive analytics to bibliographic data to predict authors who are highly likely to be coauthors. In this study, we propose an approach for coauthorship prediction based on bibliographic network embedding through a graph-based bibliographic data model that can be used to model common bibliographic data, including papers, terms, sources, authors, departments, research interests, universities, and countries. A real-world dataset released by AMiner that includes more than 2 million papers, 8 million citations, and 1.7 million authors were integrated into a large bibliographic network using the proposed bibliographic data model. Translation-based methods were applied to the entities and relationships to generate their low-dimensional embeddings while preserving their connectivity information in the original bibliographic network. We applied machine learning algorithms to embeddings that represent the coauthorship relationships of the two authors and achieved high prediction results. The reference model, which is the combination of a network embedding size of 100, the most basic translation-based method, and a gradient boosting method achieved an F1 score of 0.9 and even higher scores are obtainable with different embedding sizes and more advanced embedding methods. Thus, the strengths of the proposed approach lie in its customizable components under a unified framework.
  13. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.05
    0.04989944 = product of:
      0.09979888 = sum of:
        0.09979888 = product of:
          0.29939663 = sum of:
            0.29939663 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29939663 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39953783 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  14. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.05
    0.04989944 = product of:
      0.09979888 = sum of:
        0.09979888 = product of:
          0.29939663 = sum of:
            0.29939663 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29939663 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39953783 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  15. Corporate Semantic Web : wie semantische Anwendungen in Unternehmen Nutzen stiften (2015) 0.05
    0.04816022 = product of:
      0.09632044 = sum of:
        0.09632044 = product of:
          0.19264089 = sum of:
            0.19264089 = weight(_text_:1.7 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19264089 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.45323527 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.42503506 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.617446 = idf(docFreq=7, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Kapitel 1; Corporate Semantic Web; 1.1 Das Semantic Web; 1.2 Semantische Anwendungen im Unternehmenseinsatz; 1.3 Bereitstellen von Linked Data reicht nicht; 1.4 Eine global vernetzte Wissensbasis -- Fiktion oder Realität?; 1.5 Semantik)=)RDF?; 1.6 Richtig vorgehen; 1.7 Modellieren ist einfach (?!); 1.8 Juristische Fragen; 1.9 Semantische Anwendungen stiften Nutzen in Unternehmen -- nachweislich!; 1.10 Fazit; Literatur; Kapitel 2; Einordnung und Abgrenzung des Corporate Semantic Webs; 2.1 Grundlegende Begriffe; 2.2 Corporate Semantic Web 2.3 Public Semantic Web2.4 Social Semantic Web 3.0; 2.5 Pragmatic Web; 2.6 Zusammenfassung und Ausblick "Ubiquitous Pragmatic Web 4.0"; Literatur; Kapitel 3; Marktstudie: Welche Standards und Tools werden in Unternehmen eingesetzt?; 3.1 Einleitung; 3.2 Semantische Suche in Webarchiven (Quantinum AG); 3.2.1 Kundenanforderungen; 3.2.2 Technische Umsetzung; 3.2.3 Erfahrungswerte; 3.3 Semantische Analyse und Suche in Kundenspezifikationen (Ontos AG); 3.3.1 Kundenanforderungen; 3.3.2 Technische Umsetzung; 3.3.3 Erfahrungswerte 3.4 Sicherheit für Banken im Risikomanagement (VICO Research & Consulting GmbH)3.4.1 Kundenanforderungen; 3.4.2 Technische Umsetzung; 3.4.3 Erfahrungswerte; 3.5 Interaktive Fahrzeugdiagnose (semafora GmbH); 3.5.1 Kundenanforderungen; 3.5.2 Technische Umsetzung; 3.5.3 Erfahrungswerte; 3.6 Quo Vadis?; 3.7 Umfrage-Ergebnisse; 3.8 Semantic Web Standards & Tools; 3.9 Ausblick; Literatur; Kapitel 4; Modellierung des Sprachraums von Unternehmen; 4.1 Hintergrund; 4.2 Eine Frage der Bedeutung; 4.3 Bedeutung von Begriffen im Unternehmenskontext; 4.3.1 Website-Suche bei einem Industrieunternehmen 4.3.2 Extranet-Suche bei einem Marktforschungsunternehmen4.3.3 Intranet-Suche bei einem Fernsehsender; 4.4 Variabilität unserer Sprache und unseres Sprachgebrauchs; 4.4.1 Konsequenzen des Sprachgebrauchs; 4.5 Terminologiemanagement und Unternehmensthesaurus; 4.5.1 Unternehmensthesaurus; 4.5.2 Mut zur Lücke: Arbeiten mit unvollständigen Terminologien; 4.6 Pragmatischer Aufbau von Unternehmensthesauri; 4.6.1 Begriffsanalyse des Anwendungsbereichs; 4.6.2 Informationsquellen; 4.6.3 Häufigkeitsverteilung; 4.6.4 Aufwand und Nutzen; Literatur; Kapitel 5 Schlendern durch digitale Museen und Bibliotheken5.1 Einleitung; 5.2 Anwendungsfall 1: Schlendern durch das Digitale Museum; 5.3 Anwendungsfall 2: Literatur in Bibliotheken finden; 5.4 Herausforderungen; 5.5 Die Anforderungen treiben die Architektur; 5.5.1 Semantic ETL; 5.5.2 Semantic Logic; 5.5.3 Client; 5.6 Diskussion; 5.7 Empfehlungen und Fazit; Literatur; Kapitel 6; Semantische Suche im Bereich der Energieforschungsförderung; 6.1 Das Projekt EnArgus®; 6.2 Die Fachontologie; 6.2.1 Semantische Suche; 6.2.2 Repräsentation der semantischen Relationen in der Fachontologie
  16. #2434 0.04
    0.0446948 = product of:
      0.0893896 = sum of:
        0.0893896 = product of:
          0.1787792 = sum of:
            0.1787792 = weight(_text_:22 in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1787792 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 9.2011 12:28:22
  17. #2819 0.04
    0.0446948 = product of:
      0.0893896 = sum of:
        0.0893896 = product of:
          0.1787792 = sum of:
            0.1787792 = weight(_text_:22 in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1787792 = score(doc=2818,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  18. #4316 0.04
    0.0446948 = product of:
      0.0893896 = sum of:
        0.0893896 = product of:
          0.1787792 = sum of:
            0.1787792 = weight(_text_:22 in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1787792 = score(doc=4315,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  19. #7401 0.04
    0.0446948 = product of:
      0.0893896 = sum of:
        0.0893896 = product of:
          0.1787792 = sum of:
            0.1787792 = weight(_text_:22 in 7400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1787792 = score(doc=7400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1650285 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 7400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=7400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  20. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.04
    0.04366201 = product of:
      0.08732402 = sum of:
        0.08732402 = product of:
          0.26197207 = sum of:
            0.26197207 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.26197207 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39953783 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047126364 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.

Languages

Types

  • a 3050
  • m 345
  • el 161
  • s 140
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 17
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications