Search (3658 results, page 1 of 183)

0.0952493 = sum of:
  0.07584065 = product of:
    0.22752194 = sum of:
      0.22752194 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22752194 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4048303 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047750622 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.019408649 = product of:
    0.038817298 = sum of:
      0.038817298 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.038817298 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047750622 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.08525524 = product of:
  0.17051049 = sum of:
    0.17051049 = product of:
      0.34102097 = sum of:
        0.34102097 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 8069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34102097 = score(doc=8069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.79450846 = fieldWeight in 8069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8069)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

TrueBase 2.6

0.07937442 = sum of:
  0.06320054 = product of:
    0.18960162 = sum of:
      0.18960162 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.18960162 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4048303 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047750622 = queryNorm
          0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.016173875 = product of:
    0.03234775 = sum of:
      0.03234775 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03234775 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047750622 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968

0.07584065 = product of:
  0.1516813 = sum of:
    0.1516813 = product of:
      0.45504388 = sum of:
        0.45504388 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45504388 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4048303 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.

0.074598335 = product of:
  0.14919667 = sum of:
    0.14919667 = product of:
      0.29839334 = sum of:
        0.29839334 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 3949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29839334 = score(doc=3949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.6951949 = fieldWeight in 3949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3949)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Enthält folgende Abschnitte: 1. Interne Terminologie; darin: "Die von der Klassifikationstheorie vorgegebenen ... Begriffe 'Klasse', 'Hauptklasse' und 'Unterklasse' werden nicht verwendet, da sie in den Öffentlichen Bibliotheken wenig gebräuchlich sind. Die Verwendung ungewohnter Bezeichnungen soll keine Barriere bei der Einführung der überarbeiteten ASB sein. In der Vergangenheit, zum Beispiel im Vorwort der 81er Ausgabe der ASB, wurden bereits die Begriffe 'Hauptgruppe', 'Gruppe' und 'Untergruppe' benutzt". - "Ergebnisse der Systematisierung sind 'Hauptsystemort (HSO)' und 'Nebensystemort/e (NSO)'". // 2. Gliederung (2.1 Schriftbild - 2.2 Notationssystem - 2.3 Sachgruppenbezeichnungen - 2.4 Normierte Begriffe - 2.5 Erläuternde Zusätze - 2.6 Verweisungen - 2.7 Besondere Sachgruppen) // (3) Schlagwortregister // (4) Systematisierung (4.1 Das Zuordnungsverfahren - 4.2 Verwendung von Normierten begriffen - 4.3 Spezielle Zuordnungsverfahren)

0.06404528 = product of:
  0.12809056 = sum of:
    0.12809056 = product of:
      0.25618112 = sum of:
        0.25618112 = weight(_text_:22 in 219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25618112 = score(doc=219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.06404528 = product of:
  0.12809056 = sum of:
    0.12809056 = product of:
      0.25618112 = sum of:
        0.25618112 = weight(_text_:22 in 1386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25618112 = score(doc=1386,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 1386, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=1386)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.06404528 = product of:
  0.12809056 = sum of:
    0.12809056 = product of:
      0.25618112 = sum of:
        0.25618112 = weight(_text_:22 in 2102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25618112 = score(doc=2102,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16721454 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            1.5320505 = fieldWeight in 2102, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2102)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 5.1998 20:02:22

0.063941434 = product of:
  0.12788287 = sum of:
    0.12788287 = product of:
      0.25576574 = sum of:
        0.25576574 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25576574 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.59588134 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The data re-collection for tweets from data snapshots is a common methodological step in Twitter-based research. Understanding better the volatility of tweets over time is important for validating the reliability of metrics based on Twitter data. We tracked a set of 37,918 original scholarly tweets mentioning COVID-19-related research daily for 56 days and captured the reasons for the changes in their availability over time. Results show that the proportion of unavailable tweets increased from 1.6 to 2.6% in the time window observed. Of the 1,323 tweets that became unavailable at some point in the period observed, 30.5% became available again afterwards. "Revived" tweets resulted mainly from the unprotecting, reactivating, or unsuspending of users' accounts. Our findings highlight the importance of noting this dynamic nature of Twitter data in altmetric research and testify to the challenges that this poses for the retrieval, processing, and interpretation of Twitter data about scientific papers.

0.06320054 = product of:
  0.12640108 = sum of:
    0.12640108 = product of:
      0.37920323 = sum of:
        0.37920323 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.37920323 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4048303 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.060284562 = product of:
  0.120569125 = sum of:
    0.120569125 = product of:
      0.24113825 = sum of:
        0.24113825 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 3216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24113825 = score(doc=3216,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.5618023 = fieldWeight in 3216, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3216)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

"BOND erweitert mit zwei Updates erneut den Funktionsumfang seiner etab lierten Bibliothekssoftware und passt diese an neue Trends und Kundenwünsche an. Mehr als 400 Anregungen von Anwendern wurden im BIBLIOTHECA2000-Update, Version 2.6 und dem Web-OPAC-Update, Version 2.3 umgesetzt. Mit den Updates ist die Software nun noch benutzerfreundlicher und stabiler. Folgende Verbesserungen wurden, neben vielen weiteren, in der neuen BIBLIOTHECA2000-Version 2.6 umgesetzt: Künftig können Mahnungen, Erinnerungen und Vormerkungen noch differenzierter per Brief oder E-Mail versendet werden. Eine Plausibilitätsprüfung bei der Erfassung der Mailadresse (muss ein "@-Zeichen" enthalten etc.) stellt sicher, dass die Nachrichten auch beim Empfänger ankommen. Unter bestimmten technischen Voraussetzungen können E-Mails nun auch über SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) verschickt werden. Der neue Hilfe-Assistent mit Such- und Indexfunktion findet noch besser aktuelle Lösungen und Antworten zu BIBLIOTHECA2000. In der Periodika-Verwaltung können Daten und Inhalte sowohl zu Aboaufnahmen als auch zu aktuellen Heften von Pressekatalog (www.pressekatalog.de) automa tisch übernommen werden. Leser können dadurch im (Web-)OPAC, recherchieren, ob z.B. in einer Ausgabe von Stiftung Warentest Digitalkameras getestet wurden. Auch das Web-OPAC-Update enthält wieder zahlreiche Erweiterungen. Ab sofort können BOND-Anwender zwischen drei Designs des Web-OPAC auswählen. Neben dem klassischen Design gibt es jetzt zwei weitere, neue Designs: Summertime-Orange und Freshblue. Das Design kann je nach Wunsch eingestellt werden. Die Hilfetexte im Web-OPAC wurden vollständig überarbeitet und ergänzt. Die speziell für die Bibliotheksnutzer konzipierten Hilfen machen die Recherche noch einfacher und verständlicher. Für die Recherche sind jetzt bis zu 99 Suchtipps einstellbar. Auf diese kann auch extern verlinkt werden, z.B. von der Homepage der Stadt. Für eine noch ansprechendere Detailanzeige können den Mediengruppen bis zu 99 Symbole zugeordnet und die Exemplare optisch gegeneinander abgegrenzt werden. Die im Leserkonto angezeigten Informationen sind frei wählbar. Individuell definierte Hinweistexte (z.B. zu potentiellen Gebühren o.ä.) können im Konto angezeigt werden. Alle auf ein Konto entliehenen Medien sind über einen Mausklick sofort und ohne Bestätigung verlängerbar. Für statistische Auswertungen wird der Web-OPAC als Ausleihort behandelt. Mozilla in der Version 1.6.1 kann als alternativer Browser eingesetzt werden. Viele weitere Informationen zu den Updates erhalten Sie bei BOND unter Tel.: 063 24 / 96 12-311 oder per E-Mail an: bond@bond-online.de"

0.060284562 = product of:
  0.120569125 = sum of:
    0.120569125 = product of:
      0.24113825 = sum of:
        0.24113825 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24113825 = score(doc=3254,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.5618023 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

"BOND erweitert mit zwei Updates erneut den Funktionsumfang seiner Bibliothekssoftware und passt sie damit an neue Trends und Kundenwünsche an. Mehr als vierhundert Anregungen von Anwendern wurden im Bibliotheca2000Update, Version 2.6, und dem Web-Opac-Update, Version 2.3, umgesetzt. Mit den Updates ist die Software nun noch benutzerfreundlicher und stabiler. Neu integrierte Funktionen und erweiterte Möglichkeiten sorgen für zeitsparende Abläufe und Arbeitserleichterungen bei den insgesamt über 3000 Anwen-dern aus öffentlichen, wissenschaftlichen, Hochschul-, Firmen-, Schul- und Spezialbibliotheken. Mit Bibliotheca2000 erledigen Bibliotheken alle Arbeitsbereiche ihrer Bibliothek einfach und zeitsparend: Katalog, Ausleihe, Erwerbung, Statistik, Recherche, Periodika-Verwaltung, Web-Opac und vieles mehr. Folgende Verbesserungen wurden unter anderem in der neuen Bibliotheca2000-Version 2.6 umgesetzt: Künftig können Mahnungen, Erinnerungen und Vormerkungen noch differenzierter per Brief oder E-Mail versendet werden. Eine Plausibilitätsprüfung bei der Erfassung der Mailadresse (muss ein @-Zeichen enthalten etc.) stellt sicher, dass die Nachrichten auch beim Empfänger ankommen. Unter bestimmten technischen Voraussetzungen können E-Mails nun auch über SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) verschickt werden. Der neue Hilfe-Assistent mit Such- und Indexfunktion findet noch besser aktuelle Lösungen und Antworten zu Bibliotheca2000. In der Periodika-Verwaltung können Daten und Inhalte sowohl zu Aboaufnahmen als auch zu aktuellen Heften von Pressekatalog (www.pressekatalog.de) automatisch übernommen werden. Leser können dadurch im (Web-)Opac recherchieren, ob zum Beispiel in einer Ausgabe von Stiftung Warentest Digitalkameras getestet wurden. Auch das Web- Opac-Update ...enthält wieder zahlreiche Erweiterungen mit folgenden Highlights: Ab sofort können BONDAnwender zwischen drei attraktiven Designs des Web-Opac auswählen. Neben dem klassischen gibt es jetzt zwei weitere, neue Designs: SummertimeOrange und Freshblue. Die Hilfetexte im Web-Opac wurden vollständig überarbeitet und ergänzt. Die speziell für die Bibliotheksnutzer konzipierten Hilfen machen die Recherche noch einfacher und verständlicher. Für die Recherche sind jetzt bis zu 99 Suchtipps einstellbar. Auf diese kann auch extern verlinkt werden, etwa von der Homepage der Stadt. Für eine noch ansprechendere Detailanzeige können den Mediengruppen bis zu 99 Symbole zugeordnet und die Exemplare optisch gegeneinander abgegrenzt werden. Die im Leserkonto angezeigten Informationen sind frei wählbar. Individuell definierte Hinweistexte (beispielsweise zu potentiellen Gebühren) können im Konto angezeigt werden. Alle auf ein Konto entliehenen Medien sind über einen Mausklick sofort und ohne Bestätigung verlängerbar. Für statistische Auswertungen wird der Web-Opac als Ausleihort behandelt. Mozilla in der Version 1.6.1 kann als alternativer Browser eingesetzt werden. Weitere Informationen zu den Updates bei BOND unter Telefon 06324/9612-311 oder per E-Mail an <bond@Bond-online."

0.053284526 = product of:
  0.10656905 = sum of:
    0.10656905 = product of:
      0.2131381 = sum of:
        0.2131381 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2131381 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The DBpedia project is a community effort to extract structured information from Wikipedia and to make this information accessible on the Web. The resulting DBpedia knowledge base currently describes over 2.6 million entities. For each of these entities, DBpedia defines a globally unique identifier that can be dereferenced over the Web into a rich RDF description of the entity, including human-readable definitions in 30 languages, relationships to other resources, classifications in four concept hierarchies, various facts as well as data-level links to other Web data sources describing the entity. Over the last year, an increasing number of data publishers have begun to set data-level links to DBpedia resources, making DBpedia a central interlinking hub for the emerging Web of data. Currently, the Web of interlinked data sources around DBpedia provides approximately 4.7 billion pieces of information and covers domains suc as geographic information, people, companies, films, music, genes, drugs, books, and scientific publications. This article describes the extraction of the DBpedia knowledge base, the current status of interlinking DBpedia with other data sources on the Web, and gives an overview of applications that facilitate the Web of Data around DBpedia.

0.053284526 = product of:
  0.10656905 = sum of:
    0.10656905 = product of:
      0.2131381 = sum of:
        0.2131381 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 3244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2131381 = score(doc=3244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 3244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This chapter discusses OIL and DAML1OIL, currently the most prominent ontology languages for the Semantic Web. The chapter starts by discussing the pyramid of languages that underlie the architecture of the Semantic Web (XML, RDF, RDFS). In section 2.2, we briefly describe XML, RDF and RDFS. We then discuss in more detail OIL and DAML1OIL, the first proposals for languages at the ontology layer of the semantic pyramid. For OIL (and to some extent DAML1OIL) we discuss the general design motivations (Section 2.3), describe the constructions in the language (Section 2.4), and the various syntactic forms of these languages (Section 2.5). Section 2.6 discusses the layered architecture of the language, section 2.7 briefly mentions the formal semantics, section 2.8 discusses the transition from OIL to DAML+OIL, and section 2.9 concludes with our experience with the language to date and future development in the context of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). This chapter is not intended to give full and formal definitions of either the syntax or the semantics of OIL or DAML1OIL. Such definitions are already available elsewhere: http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/ for OIL and http://www.w3.org/submission/2001/12/ for DAML1OIL.

0.053284526 = product of:
  0.10656905 = sum of:
    0.10656905 = product of:
      0.2131381 = sum of:
        0.2131381 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 3182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2131381 = score(doc=3182,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 3182, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3182)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Contents: 1. Introduction; 2. Theoretical views: 2.1 Charles Ammi Cutter (1837-1903), 2.2 S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972), 2.3 Patrick Wilson (1927-2003), 2.4 "Content oriented" versus "request oriented" views, 2.5 Issues of subjectivity and objectivity, 2.6 The subject knowledge view, 2.7 Other views and definitions; 3. Related concepts: 3.1 Words versus concepts versus subjects, 3.2 Aboutness, 3.3 Topic, 3.4 Isness, 3.5 Ofness, 3.6 Theme.

0.053284526 = product of:
  0.10656905 = sum of:
    0.10656905 = product of:
      0.2131381 = sum of:
        0.2131381 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 4225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2131381 = score(doc=4225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 4225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4225)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

National governments would like to preside over an expanding and increasingly high-impact science system but are these two goals largely independent or closely linked? This article investigates the relationship between changes in the share of the world's scientific output and changes in relative citation impact for 2.6 million articles from 26 fields in the 25 countries with the most Scopus-indexed journal articles from 1996 to 2015. There is a negative correlation between expansion and relative citation impact, but their relationship varies. China, Spain, Australia, and Poland were successful overall across the 26 fields, expanding both their share of the world's output and its relative citation impact, whereas Japan, France, Sweden, and Israel had decreased shares and relative citation impact. In contrast, the USA, UK, Germany, Italy, Russia, The Netherlands, Switzerland, Finland, and Denmark all enjoyed increased relative citation impact despite a declining share of publications. Finally, India, South Korea, Brazil, Taiwan, and Turkey all experienced sustained expansion but a recent fall in relative citation impact. These results may partly reflect changes in the coverage of Scopus and the selection of fields.

0.053284526 = product of:
  0.10656905 = sum of:
    0.10656905 = product of:
      0.2131381 = sum of:
        0.2131381 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2131381 = score(doc=35,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This study investigated the stability of Twitter counts of scientific publications over time. For this, we conducted an analysis of the availability statuses of over 2.6 million Twitter mentions received by the 1,154 most tweeted scientific publications recorded by Altmetric.com up to October 2017. The results show that of the Twitter mentions for these highly tweeted publications, about 14.3% had become unavailable by April 2019. Deletion of tweets by users is the main reason for unavailability, followed by suspension and protection of Twitter user accounts. This study proposes two measures for describing the Twitter dissemination structures of publications: Degree of Originality (i.e., the proportion of original tweets received by an article) and Degree of Concentration (i.e., the degree to which retweets concentrate on a single original tweet). Twitter metrics of publications with relatively low Degree of Originality and relatively high Degree of Concentration were observed to be at greater risk of becoming unstable due to the potential disappearance of their Twitter mentions. In light of these results, we emphasize the importance of paying attention to the potential risk of unstable Twitter counts, and the significance of identifying the different Twitter dissemination structures when studying the Twitter metrics of scientific publications.

0.053284526 = product of:
  0.10656905 = sum of:
    0.10656905 = product of:
      0.2131381 = sum of:
        0.2131381 = weight(_text_:2.6 in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2131381 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42922258 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.4965678 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.988837 = idf(docFreq=14, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

With the growth of open access (OA), the financial flows in scholarly journal publishing have become increasingly complex, but comprehensive data on and transparency of these flows are still lacking. The opacity is especially concerning for hybrid OA, where subscription-based journals publish individual articles as OA if an optional fee is paid. This study addresses the lack of transparency by leveraging Elsevier article metadata and provides the first publisher-level study of hybrid OA uptake and invoicing. Our results show that Elsevier's hybrid OA uptake has grown steadily but slowly from 2015 to 2019, doubling the number of hybrid OA articles published per year and increasing the share of OA articles in Elsevier's hybrid journals from 2.6 to 3.7% of all articles. Further, we find that most hybrid OA articles were invoiced directly to authors, followed by articles invoiced through agreements with research funders, institutions, or consortia, with only a few funding bodies driving hybrid OA uptake. As such, our findings point to the role of publishing agreements and OA policies in hybrid OA publishing. Our results further demonstrate the value of publisher-provided metadata to improve the transparency in scholarly publishing.

0.05056043 = product of:
  0.10112086 = sum of:
    0.10112086 = product of:
      0.30336258 = sum of:
        0.30336258 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30336258 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4048303 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.

0.05056043 = product of:
  0.10112086 = sum of:
    0.10112086 = product of:
      0.30336258 = sum of:
        0.30336258 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30336258 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4048303 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047750622 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H