Search (5788 results, page 1 of 290)

  1. Hockett, C.F.: ¬The problem of universals in language (1963) 0.16
    0.15570943 = product of:
      0.31141886 = sum of:
        0.31141886 = sum of:
          0.19920048 = weight(_text_:language in 5591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19920048 = score(doc=5591,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.9808232 = fieldWeight in 5591, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5591)
          0.11221837 = weight(_text_:22 in 5591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11221837 = score(doc=5591,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5591, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5591)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S. 1-22
    Source
    Universals of language. Ed.: J.H. Greenberg
  2. Agarwal, M.L.; Sharma, S.G.: Classificatory language : an artificial / technical language (1994) 0.13
    0.13349438 = product of:
      0.26698875 = sum of:
        0.26698875 = sum of:
          0.19685227 = weight(_text_:language in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19685227 = score(doc=518,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.96926105 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
          0.07013648 = weight(_text_:22 in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07013648 = score(doc=518,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the unsuitability of natural language for use as a language in classification schemes and notes the advantages of technical and artificial languages. Considers the various aspects of classificatory language and its components such as significant digits, connecting symbols, canons and principles underlying its grammar
    Source
    Annals of library science and documentation. 41(1994) no.1, S.10-22
  3. Kashyap, M.M.: Algorithms for analysis and representation of subject contents in a documentary language (1983) 0.13
    0.12653719 = product of:
      0.25307438 = sum of:
        0.25307438 = sum of:
          0.14085601 = weight(_text_:language in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14085601 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.11221837 = weight(_text_:22 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11221837 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library herald. 22(1983), S.1-29
  4. Evans, R.; Gazdar, G.: DATR: a language for lexical knowledge representation (1996) 0.13
    0.12653719 = product of:
      0.25307438 = sum of:
        0.25307438 = sum of:
          0.14085601 = weight(_text_:language in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14085601 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
          0.11221837 = weight(_text_:22 in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11221837 = score(doc=3965,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.167-216
  5. Warner, A.J.: Natural language processing (1987) 0.13
    0.12653719 = product of:
      0.25307438 = sum of:
        0.25307438 = sum of:
          0.14085601 = weight(_text_:language in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14085601 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.6935467 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
          0.11221837 = weight(_text_:22 in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11221837 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.79-108
  6. Haas, S.W.: Natural language processing : toward large-scale, robust systems (1996) 0.12
    0.12122209 = product of:
      0.24244419 = sum of:
        0.24244419 = sum of:
          0.186335 = weight(_text_:language in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.186335 = score(doc=7415,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.9174761 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
          0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 7415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056109186 = score(doc=7415,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7415, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7415)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of natural language processing updating an earlier review published in ARIST 22(1987). Discusses important developments that have allowed for significant advances in the field of natural language processing: materials and resources; knowledge based systems and statistical approaches; and a strong emphasis on evaluation. Reviews some natural language processing applications and common problems still awaiting solution. Considers closely related applications such as language generation and th egeneration phase of machine translation which face the same problems as natural language processing. Covers natural language methodologies for information retrieval only briefly
  7. McMahon, J.G.; Smith, F.J.: Improved statistical language model performance with automatic generated word hierarchies (1996) 0.11
    0.11072004 = product of:
      0.22144008 = sum of:
        0.22144008 = sum of:
          0.123249 = weight(_text_:language in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.123249 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.60685337 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
          0.098191075 = weight(_text_:22 in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.098191075 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Computational linguistics. 22(1996) no.2, S.217-248
  8. Cronin, B.: Vernacular and vehicular language (2009) 0.11
    0.11072004 = product of:
      0.22144008 = sum of:
        0.22144008 = sum of:
          0.123249 = weight(_text_:language in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.123249 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.60685337 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
          0.098191075 = weight(_text_:22 in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.098191075 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 11:44:11
  9. Tomaiuolo, N.G.; Parker, J.: Maximizing relevant retrieval : keyword and natural language searching (1998) 0.11
    0.11072004 = product of:
      0.22144008 = sum of:
        0.22144008 = sum of:
          0.123249 = weight(_text_:language in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.123249 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.60685337 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
          0.098191075 = weight(_text_:22 in 6418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.098191075 = score(doc=6418,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6418, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.57-58
  10. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.11
    0.10862944 = sum of:
      0.082218945 = product of:
        0.24665684 = sum of:
          0.24665684 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24665684 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43887708 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0264105 = product of:
        0.052821 = sum of:
          0.052821 = weight(_text_:language in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052821 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.26008 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Source
    Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing - proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop (TextGraphs-13): November 4, 2019, Hong Kong : EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. Ed.: Dmitry Ustalov
  11. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.11
    0.10862944 = sum of:
      0.082218945 = product of:
        0.24665684 = sum of:
          0.24665684 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24665684 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43887708 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.0264105 = product of:
        0.052821 = sum of:
          0.052821 = weight(_text_:language in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052821 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.26008 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  12. Morris, V.: Automated language identification of bibliographic resources (2020) 0.11
    0.106795505 = product of:
      0.21359101 = sum of:
        0.21359101 = sum of:
          0.15748182 = weight(_text_:language in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15748182 = score(doc=5749,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.77540886 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
          0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 5749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056109186 = score(doc=5749,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5749, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes experiments in the use of machine learning techniques at the British Library to assign language codes to catalog records, in order to provide information about the language of content of the resources described. In the first phase of the project, language codes were assigned to 1.15 million records with 99.7% confidence. The automated language identification tools developed will be used to contribute to future enhancement of over 4 million legacy records.
    Date
    2. 3.2020 19:04:22
  13. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10
    0.10325989 = sum of:
      0.082218945 = product of:
        0.24665684 = sum of:
          0.24665684 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24665684 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43887708 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.021040944 = product of:
        0.04208189 = sum of:
          0.04208189 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04208189 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  14. Yazdani, M.; Maeling, S.: Communicating through pictures (1995) 0.10
    0.097318396 = product of:
      0.19463679 = sum of:
        0.19463679 = sum of:
          0.124500304 = weight(_text_:language in 3676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.124500304 = score(doc=3676,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.6130145 = fieldWeight in 3676, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3676)
          0.07013648 = weight(_text_:22 in 3676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07013648 = score(doc=3676,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3676, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3676)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents desing consideration for a visual language which may allow users with different linguistic backgrounds to communicate freely. This cross language communication uses icons which are graphically clear, semantically unambiguous, adaptable and, above all, simple
    Date
    30. 3.1996 19:22:06
  15. Jascó, P.: Don't kiss Boolean goodbye : it's AND not OR, let alone XOR (1994) 0.09
    0.09490289 = product of:
      0.18980578 = sum of:
        0.18980578 = sum of:
          0.105642 = weight(_text_:language in 7159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.105642 = score(doc=7159,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.52016 = fieldWeight in 7159, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7159)
          0.08416378 = weight(_text_:22 in 7159) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08416378 = score(doc=7159,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7159, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7159)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Gently criticizes the recent trend away from Boolean searching and towards natural language searching in online systems
    Source
    Information today. 11(1994) no.2, S.22-24
  16. Schubert, K.: Parameters for the design of an intermediate language for multilingual thesauri (1995) 0.09
    0.09344607 = product of:
      0.18689214 = sum of:
        0.18689214 = sum of:
          0.1377966 = weight(_text_:language in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1377966 = score(doc=2092,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.6784828 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
          0.049095538 = weight(_text_:22 in 2092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049095538 = score(doc=2092,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2092, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The architecture of multilingual software systems is sometimes centred around an intermediate language. The question is analyzed to what extent this approach can be useful for multilingual thesauri, in particular regarding the functionality the thesaurus is designed to fulfil. Both the runtime use, and the construction and maintenance of the system is taken into consideration. Using the perspective of general language technology enables to draw on experience from a broader range of fields beyond thesaurus design itself as well as to consider the possibility of using a thesaurus as a knowledge module in various systems which process natural language. Therefore the features which thesauri and other natural-language processing systems have in common are emphasized, especially at the level of systems design and their core functionality
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) nos.3/4, S.136-140
  17. Levergood, B.; Farrenkopf, S.; Frasnelli, E.: ¬The specification of the language of the field and interoperability : cross-language access to catalogues and online libraries (CACAO) (2008) 0.09
    0.09091657 = product of:
      0.18183313 = sum of:
        0.18183313 = sum of:
          0.13975124 = weight(_text_:language in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13975124 = score(doc=2646,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.6881071 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
          0.04208189 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04208189 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The CACAO Project (Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries) has been designed to implement natural language processing and cross-language information retrieval techniques to provide cross-language access to information in libraries, a critical issue in the linguistically diverse European Union. This project report addresses two metadata-related challenges for the library community in this context: "false friends" (identical words having different meanings in different languages) and term ambiguity. The possible solutions involve enriching the metadata with attributes specifying language or the source authority file, or associating potential search terms to classes in a classification system. The European Library will evaluate an early implementation of this work in late 2008.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  18. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.09
    0.089047045 = product of:
      0.17809409 = sum of:
        0.17809409 = sum of:
          0.1219849 = weight(_text_:language in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1219849 = score(doc=4685,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.60062915 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.056109186 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056109186 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This document contains and presents test cases for the Web Ontology Language (OWL) approved by the Web Ontology Working Group. Many of the test cases illustrate the correct usage of the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and the formal meaning of its constructs. Other test cases illustrate the resolution of issues considered by the Working Group. Conformance for OWL documents and OWL document checkers is specified.
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
  19. Fachsystematik Bremen nebst Schlüssel 1970 ff. (1970 ff) 0.09
    0.086049914 = sum of:
      0.06851579 = product of:
        0.20554736 = sum of:
          0.20554736 = weight(_text_:3a in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20554736 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.43887708 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.01753412 = product of:
        0.03506824 = sum of:
          0.03506824 = weight(_text_:22 in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03506824 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Agrarwissenschaften 1981. - 3. Allgemeine Geographie 2.1972. - 3a. Allgemeine Naturwissenschaften 1.1973. - 4. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Allgemeine Literaturwissenschaft 2.1971. - 6. Allgemeines. 5.1983. - 7. Anglistik 3.1976. - 8. Astronomie, Geodäsie 4.1977. - 12. bio Biologie, bcp Biochemie-Biophysik, bot Botanik, zoo Zoologie 1981. - 13. Bremensien 3.1983. - 13a. Buch- und Bibliothekswesen 3.1975. - 14. Chemie 4.1977. - 14a. Elektrotechnik 1974. - 15 Ethnologie 2.1976. - 16,1. Geowissenschaften. Sachteil 3.1977. - 16,2. Geowissenschaften. Regionaler Teil 3.1977. - 17. Germanistik 6.1984. - 17a,1. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hil. - 17a,2. Geschichte. Teilsystematik his Neuere Geschichte. - 17a,3. Geschichte. Teilsystematik hit Neueste Geschichte. - 18. Humanbiologie 2.1983. - 19. Ingenieurwissenschaften 1974. - 20. siehe 14a. - 21. klassische Philologie 3.1977. - 22. Klinische Medizin 1975. - 23. Kunstgeschichte 2.1971. - 24. Kybernetik. 2.1975. - 25. Mathematik 3.1974. - 26. Medizin 1976. - 26a. Militärwissenschaft 1985. - 27. Musikwissenschaft 1978. - 27a. Noten 2.1974. - 28. Ozeanographie 3.1977. -29. Pädagogik 8.1985. - 30. Philosphie 3.1974. - 31. Physik 3.1974. - 33. Politik, Politische Wissenschaft, Sozialwissenschaft. Soziologie. Länderschlüssel. Register 1981. - 34. Psychologie 2.1972. - 35. Publizistik und Kommunikationswissenschaft 1985. - 36. Rechtswissenschaften 1986. - 37. Regionale Geograpgie 3.1975. - 37a. Religionswissenschaft 1970. - 38. Romanistik 3.1976. - 39. Skandinavistik 4.1985. - 40. Slavistik 1977. - 40a. Sonstige Sprachen und Literaturen 1973. - 43. Sport 4.1983. - 44. Theaterwissenschaft 1985. - 45. Theologie 2.1976. - 45a. Ur- und Frühgeschichte, Archäologie 1970. - 47. Volkskunde 1976. - 47a. Wirtschaftswissenschaften 1971 // Schlüssel: 1. Länderschlüssel 1971. - 2. Formenschlüssel (Kurzform) 1974. - 3. Personenschlüssel Literatur 5. Fassung 1968
  20. Devadason, F.J.: Postulate-Based Permuted Subject Indexing Language as a metalanguage for computer-aided generation of information retrieval thesaurus (1983) 0.09
    0.085733205 = product of:
      0.17146641 = sum of:
        0.17146641 = sum of:
          0.12938452 = weight(_text_:language in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12938452 = score(doc=1637,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.2030952 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.6370634 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.9232929 = idf(docFreq=2376, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
          0.04208189 = weight(_text_:22 in 1637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04208189 = score(doc=1637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18127751 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051766515 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The development of the general theory of subject indexing language and of POPSI for organisation, storage and retrieval of subjects embodies in documents has a striking parallel in the search for and development of 'universal forms' and 'deep structure' in language and linguistic studies. This paper briefly traces the development of POPSI language as a metalanguage for information organisation and for generating information retrieval thesaurus. Also a computer-based system for generating an information retrieval thesaurus from modulated subject headings formulated according to POPSI which are enriched with certain codes for relating the terms in the subject headings is described. It is also mentioned that, if it is possible to form a table of equivalent terms in another language for the terms already used to generate the thesaurus, then it is possible to translate the thesaurus automatically into the other language
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.22-29

Languages

Types

  • a 4796
  • m 577
  • el 313
  • s 237
  • x 51
  • b 48
  • i 31
  • r 31
  • n 16
  • p 11
  • ? 9
  • d 4
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • v 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications