Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

Egghe, L.: ¬The influence of transformations on the h-index and the g-index (2008) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)

Object: g-index

Egghe, L.: Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship (2008) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)

Object: g-index

Schreiber, M.: Fractionalized counting of publications for the g-Index (2009) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 3125, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3125)

Object: g-index

Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3313) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 3313, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3313)

Object: g-index

Zhang, C.-T.: Relationship of the h-index, g-index, and e-index (2010) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 3418, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3418)

Object: g-index

Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.; Viel, F.: ¬A robust benchmark for the h- and g-indexes (2010) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 3470, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3470)

Object: g-index

Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=463)

Object: g-index

Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.; Viel, F.: Assessing the accuracy of the h- and g-indexes for measuring researchers' productivity (2013) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 957, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=957)

Object: g-index

Visscher, A. De: Response to "remarks on the paper by a. De Visscher, 'what does the g-index really measure?' " (2013) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 1052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 1052, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1052)

Object: g-index

Visscher, A. De: What does the g-index really measure? (2011) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)

Object: g-index

Hovden, R.: Bibliometrics for Internet media : applying the h-index to YouTube (2013) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 1111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 1111, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1111)

Object: g-index

Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 1113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 1113, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1113)

Object: g-index

Prathap, G.: Measures for impact, consistency, and the h- and g-indices (2014) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)

Object: g-index

Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 1508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 1508, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1508)

Object: g-index

Rousseau, R.: Egghe's g-index is not a proper concentration measure (2015) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)

Object: g-index

Bartolucci, F.: ¬A comparison between the g-index and the h-index based on concentration (2015) 8.86

8.863674 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
  8.863674 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
    1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
      1.0 = termFreq=1.0
    8.863674 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44218)
    1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)

Object: g-index

Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years