Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  1. Egghe, L.: ¬The influence of transformations on the h-index and the g-index (2008) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
    
    Object
    g-index
  2. Egghe, L.: Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship (2008) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 4005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 4005, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4005)
    
    Object
    g-index
  3. Schreiber, M.: Fractionalized counting of publications for the g-Index (2009) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
    
    Object
    g-index
  4. Schreiber, M.: Revisiting the g-index : the average number of citations in the g-core (2009) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 314, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=314)
    
    Object
    g-index
  5. Zhang, C.-T.: Relationship of the h-index, g-index, and e-index (2010) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
    
    Object
    g-index
  6. Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.; Viel, F.: ¬A robust benchmark for the h- and g-indexes (2010) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
    
    Object
    g-index
  7. Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
    
    Object
    g-index
  8. Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.; Viel, F.: Assessing the accuracy of the h- and g-indexes for measuring researchers' productivity (2013) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 2958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 2958, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2958)
    
    Object
    g-index
  9. Visscher, A. De: Response to "remarks on the paper by a. De Visscher, 'what does the g-index really measure?' " (2013) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
    
    Object
    g-index
  10. Visscher, A. De: What does the g-index really measure? (2011) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
    
    Object
    g-index
  11. Hovden, R.: Bibliometrics for Internet media : applying the h-index to YouTube (2013) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
    
    Object
    g-index
  12. Schreiber, M.: Do we need the g-index? (2013) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 3114, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3114)
    
    Object
    g-index
  13. Prathap, G.: Measures for impact, consistency, and the h- and g-indices (2014) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
    
    Object
    g-index
  14. Egghe, L.: ¬A good normalized impact and concentration measure (2014) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 3509, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3509)
    
    Object
    g-index
  15. Rousseau, R.: Egghe's g-index is not a proper concentration measure (2015) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 3865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 3865, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3865)
    
    Object
    g-index
  16. Bartolucci, F.: ¬A comparison between the g-index and the h-index based on concentration (2015) 8.82
    8.81947 = weight(object_ss:g-index in 4351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      8.81947 = fieldWeight in 4351, product of:
        1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
          1.0 = termFreq=1.0
        8.81947 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=42306)
        1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4351)
    
    Object
    g-index