Search (3729 results, page 1 of 187)

  1. Kuhlen, R.; Rittberger, M.: Stand und Perspektiven der Informationswissenschaft unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Erfahrungen in Konstanz (1998) 0.17 
    0.17291197 = product of:
  0.34582394 = sum of:
    0.34582394 = sum of:
      0.27881366 = weight(_text_:302 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.27881366 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.7891986 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.0670103 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0670103 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17319745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.285-302
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  2. Dobrowolski, Z.: Étude sur la construction des systèmes de classification (1964) 0.14 
    0.13940683 = product of:
  0.27881366 = sum of:
    0.27881366 = product of:
      0.5576273 = sum of:
        0.5576273 = weight(_text_:302 in 4952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5576273 = score(doc=4952,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.5783972 = fieldWeight in 4952, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=4952)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    302 S
  3. Kiem, C.M.; Middleton, M.: ¬An evaluation of textual storage and retrieval software : CDS/ISIS and InMagic (1998) 0.14 
    0.13832958 = product of:
  0.27665916 = sum of:
    0.27665916 = sum of:
      0.22305092 = weight(_text_:302 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.22305092 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.63135886 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
      0.053608235 = weight(_text_:22 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.053608235 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17319745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:54:49
    Source
    Program. 32(1998) no.3, S.283-302
  4. Huffman, G.D.: Semi-automatic determination of citation relevancy : user evaluation (1990) 0.12 
    0.12103838 = product of:
  0.24207675 = sum of:
    0.24207675 = sum of:
      0.19516955 = weight(_text_:302 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19516955 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.552439 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
      0.046907205 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046907205 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17319745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Online bibiographic, database searches typically produce hundreds of retrieved citations with only about 20-40% relevant to the search topic and/or problem statement. Significant amounts of time are required to categorize and select the relevant citations. A software system-SORT-AIDS/SABRE-has been developes which ranks the citations in terms of relevance. This paper presents the results of a comprehensive user evaluation of the relevance ranking procedures. Test results show that the software generated distributions approach the ideal distribution-all relevant citations at the beginning of the collection-in 22% of the cases, are 23% better than the random distribution-relevant citations distributed uniformly throughout the dcollection-on average and are poorer than the random distribution in 4% of the cae.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 26(1990) no.2, S.295-302
  5. Wissen - Innovation - Netzwerke : Wege zur Zukunftsfähigkeit (2003) 0.12 
    0.12103838 = product of:
  0.24207675 = sum of:
    0.24207675 = sum of:
      0.19516955 = weight(_text_:302 in 1391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19516955 = score(doc=1391,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.552439 = fieldWeight in 1391, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1391)
      0.046907205 = weight(_text_:22 in 1391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.046907205 = score(doc=1391,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17319745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1391, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1391)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:48:44
    Pages
    XVIII, 302 S
  6. Moore, C.W.: User reactions to online catalogs : an exploratory study (1981) 0.11 
    0.11152546 = product of:
  0.22305092 = sum of:
    0.22305092 = product of:
      0.44610184 = sum of:
        0.44610184 = weight(_text_:302 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44610184 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.2627177 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    College and research libraries. 42(1981) no.4, S.295-302
  7. Swanson, D.R.: Requirements study for future catalogs (1972) 0.11 
    0.11152546 = product of:
  0.22305092 = sum of:
    0.22305092 = product of:
      0.44610184 = sum of:
        0.44610184 = weight(_text_:302 in 680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44610184 = score(doc=680,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.2627177 = fieldWeight in 680, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=680)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Library quarterly. 42(1972), S.302-315
  8. Cleverdon, C.W.: Aslib Cranfield research project : report on the testing and analysis of an investigation into the comparative efficiency of indexing systems (1962) 0.11 
    0.11152546 = product of:
  0.22305092 = sum of:
    0.22305092 = product of:
      0.44610184 = sum of:
        0.44610184 = weight(_text_:302 in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44610184 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.2627177 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    302 S
  9. Hypertext und Hypermedia : von theoretischen Konzepten zur praktischen Anwendung (1990) 0.11 
    0.11152546 = product of:
  0.22305092 = sum of:
    0.22305092 = product of:
      0.44610184 = sum of:
        0.44610184 = weight(_text_:302 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44610184 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.2627177 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    IX,302 S
  10. Perreault, J.M.: Some perils of the 'user-friendly' attitude in cataloguing (1986) 0.11 
    0.11152546 = product of:
  0.22305092 = sum of:
    0.22305092 = product of:
      0.44610184 = sum of:
        0.44610184 = weight(_text_:302 in 6177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44610184 = score(doc=6177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.2627177 = fieldWeight in 6177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6177)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Advances in librarianship. 14(1986), S.302-
  11. Fröschner, G.: Zur Weiterentwicklung der Bibliothekarisch-Bibliographischen Klassifikation (BBK) in der Sowjetunion (1979) 0.11 
    0.11152546 = product of:
  0.22305092 = sum of:
    0.22305092 = product of:
      0.44610184 = sum of:
        0.44610184 = weight(_text_:302 in 7370) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44610184 = score(doc=7370,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.2627177 = fieldWeight in 7370, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7370)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen. 93(1979), S.293-302
  12. Buch, H.: ¬Die Koordinierungsstelle der Europäischen Dokumentationszentren in Nordrhein-Westfalen (1994) 0.11 
    0.11152546 = product of:
  0.22305092 = sum of:
    0.22305092 = product of:
      0.44610184 = sum of:
        0.44610184 = weight(_text_:302 in 8181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44610184 = score(doc=8181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.2627177 = fieldWeight in 8181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Mitteilungsblatt. VdB NW. N.F. 44(1994) H.3, S.292-302
  13. Moore, C.: Microcomputer software for library and information work (1991) 0.11 
    0.11152546 = product of:
  0.22305092 = sum of:
    0.22305092 = product of:
      0.44610184 = sum of:
        0.44610184 = weight(_text_:302 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.44610184 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.2627177 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.283-302
  14. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.10 
    0.10374719 = product of:
  0.20749438 = sum of:
    0.20749438 = sum of:
      0.1672882 = weight(_text_:302 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1672882 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.47351915 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.040206175 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040206175 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17319745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.302-310
  15. link: Zeitmaschine im Kopf : Das Auge ist zu schnell für das Gehirn (2001) 0.10 
    0.10374719 = product of:
  0.20749438 = sum of:
    0.20749438 = sum of:
      0.1672882 = weight(_text_:302 in 6889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1672882 = score(doc=6889,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.47351915 = fieldWeight in 6889, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6889)
      0.040206175 = weight(_text_:22 in 6889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040206175 = score(doc=6889,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17319745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6889, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6889)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Schaut man ruckartig auf eine Uhr, so bleibt einen winzigen Moment lang die Zeit stehen - für unser Gehirn. Denn nach schnellen Augenbewegungen nehmen wir ein neues Bild länger wahr, als wir es tatsächlich sehen. Dieses "Chronostasis" genannte Phänomen mag mancher schon bemerkt haben. Jetzt haben englische Forscher herausgefunden, dass seine Dauer von der Augenbewegung abhängt, die zuvor gemacht wurde (Nature, Bd. 414, S. 302, 2001). Die Wissenschaftler ließen Probanden auf einen Zähler blicken. Obwohl dessen erste Ziffer nur 880 Millisekunden erschien, nahmen die Testpersonen sie nach einer Augendrehung von 22 Grad als eine Sekunde wahr. Das Resümee der Versuche: Wir sehen ein neues Bild um genau so viel länger, wie die Augenbewegung zuvor dauerte. Unsere Zeitwahrnehmung spult quasi auf Start zurück. "Drei- bis viermal pro Sekunde bewegen wir blitzartig unsere Augen - für das Gehirn viel zu schnell, um die Umwelt klar abzubilden", erklärt der Psychologe Heiner Deubel von der Universität München. Dadurch entstünden visuelle Lücken im Gehirn, die wieder aufgefüllt werden, indem man danach gesehene Objekte länger wahrnimmt - zum Beispiel eine Uhr. Deubel: "Sonst würden wir die Welt bei jeder Augenbewegung wie wild umherspringen sehen.""
  16. Campos, L.M. de; Fernández-Luna, J.M.; Huete, J.F.: Implementing relevance feedback in the Bayesian network retrieval model (2003) 0.10 
    0.10374719 = product of:
  0.20749438 = sum of:
    0.20749438 = sum of:
      0.1672882 = weight(_text_:302 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.1672882 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.47351915 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
      0.040206175 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040206175 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17319745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2003 19:30:19
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.4, S.302-313
  17. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.10 
    0.098657295 = sum of:
  0.078554206 = product of:
    0.23566261 = sum of:
      0.23566261 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.23566261 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.41931504 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.020103088 = product of:
    0.040206175 = sum of:
      0.040206175 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.040206175 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17319745 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.04945913 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  18. Richmond, P.A.: ¬A thesaurus within a thesaurus : a study in ambiguity (1973) 0.10 
    0.09758478 = product of:
  0.19516955 = sum of:
    0.19516955 = product of:
      0.3903391 = sum of:
        0.3903391 = weight(_text_:302 in 1450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3903391 = score(doc=1450,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.104878 = fieldWeight in 1450, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1450)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.268-302
  19. Gilster, P.: Finding it on the Internet (1994) 0.10 
    0.09758478 = product of:
  0.19516955 = sum of:
    0.19516955 = product of:
      0.3903391 = sum of:
        0.3903391 = weight(_text_:302 in 2138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3903391 = score(doc=2138,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.104878 = fieldWeight in 2138, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2138)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    302 S
  20. Controlling von Informationsressourcen : endlich sind Fortschritte in Theorie und Praxis auszumachen. Eine Nachlese zur KWID-Tagung 'Informationscontrolling' (1995) 0.10 
    0.09758478 = product of:
  0.19516955 = sum of:
    0.19516955 = product of:
      0.3903391 = sum of:
        0.3903391 = weight(_text_:302 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3903391 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.35328707 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04945913 = queryNorm
            1.104878 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.14301 = idf(docFreq=94, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 46(1995) H.5, S.302-317

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3102
  • m 366
  • el 162
  • s 146
  • b 39
  • x 35
  • i 23
  • r 19
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • l 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications