Search (3932 results, page 8 of 197)

  1. Chae, G.; Park, J.; Park, J.; Yeo, W.S.; Shi, C.: Linking and clustering artworks using social tags : revitalizing crowd-sourced information on cultural collections (2016) 0.05 
    0.048587844 = product of:
  0.09717569 = sum of:
    0.09717569 = product of:
      0.19435138 = sum of:
        0.19435138 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2852) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19435138 = score(doc=2852,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.652292 = fieldWeight in 2852, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2852)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Social tagging is one of the most popular methods for collecting crowd-sourced information in galleries, libraries, archives, and museums (GLAMs). However, when the number of social tags grows rapidly, using them becomes problematic and, as a result, they are often left as simply big data that cannot be used for practical purposes. To revitalize the use of this crowd-sourced information, we propose using social tags to link and cluster artworks based on an experimental study using an online collection at the Gyeonggi Museum of Modern Art (GMoMA). We view social tagging as a folksonomy, where artworks are classified by keywords of the crowd's various interpretations and one artwork can belong to several different categories simultaneously. To leverage this strength of social tags, we used a clustering method called "link communities" to detect overlapping communities in a network of artworks constructed by computing similarities between all artwork pairs. We used this framework to identify semantic relationships and clusters of similar artworks. By comparing the clustering results with curators' manual classification results, we demonstrated the potential of social tagging data for automatically clustering artworks in a way that reflects the dynamic perspectives of crowds.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  2. Bruhn, C.; Syn, S.Y.: Pragmatic thought as a philosophical foundation for collaborative tagging and the Semantic Web (2018) 0.05 
    0.048587844 = product of:
  0.09717569 = sum of:
    0.09717569 = product of:
      0.19435138 = sum of:
        0.19435138 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19435138 = score(doc=4245,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.652292 = fieldWeight in 4245, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4245)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to use ideas drawn from two founders of American pragmatism, William James and Charles Sanders Peirce, in order to propose a philosophical foundation that supports the value of collaborative tagging and reinforces the structure and goals of the Semantic Web. Design/methodology/approach The study employs a close analysis of key literature by James and Peirce to answer recent calls for a philosophy of the Web and to respond to research in the LIS literature that has assessed the value and limitations of folksonomy. Moreover, pragmatic views are applied to illustrate the relationships among collaborative tagging, linked data, and the Semantic Web. Findings With a philosophical foundation in place, the study highlights the value of the minority tags that fall within the so-called "long tail" of the power law graph, and the importance of granting sufficient time for the full value of folksonomy to be revealed. The discussion goes further to explore how "collaborative tagging" could evolve into "collaborative knowledge" in the form of linked data. Specifically, Peirce's triadic architectonic is shown to foster an understanding of the construction of linked data through the functional requirements for bibliographic records entity-relation model and resource description framework triples, and James's image of the multiverse anticipates the goals Tim Berners-Lee has articulated for the Semantic Web. Originality/value This study is unique in using Jamesian and Peircean thinking to argue for the value of folksonomy and to suggest implications for the Semantic Web.
  3. Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Flickr and democratic indexing : disciplining desire lines (2006) 0.05 
    0.048099514 = product of:
  0.09619903 = sum of:
    0.09619903 = product of:
      0.19239806 = sum of:
        0.19239806 = weight(_text_:tagging in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19239806 = score(doc=119,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.64573616 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In this paper, we consider three models of subject indexing, and compare and contrast two indexing approaches, the theoretically based democratic indexing project, and Flickr, a working system for describing photographs. We argue that, despite Shirky's (2005) claim of philosophical paradigm shifting for social tagging, there is a residing doubt amongst information professionals that self-organising systems can work without there being some element of control and some form of 'representative authority'.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  4. Tonkin, E.; Baptista, A.A.; Hooland, S. van; Resmini, A.; Mendéz, E.; Neville, L.: Kinds of Tags : a collaborative research study on tag usage and structure (2007) 0.05 
    0.048099514 = product of:
  0.09619903 = sum of:
    0.09619903 = product of:
      0.19239806 = sum of:
        0.19239806 = weight(_text_:tagging in 531) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19239806 = score(doc=531,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.64573616 = fieldWeight in 531, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=531)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    KoT (Kinds of Tags) is an ongoing joint collaborative research effort with many participants worldwide, including the University of Minho, UKOLN, the University of Bologna, the Université Libre de Bruxelles and La Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. It is focused on the analysis of tags that are in common use in the practice of social tagging, with the aim of discovering how easily tags can be 'normalised' for interoperability with standard metadata environments such as the DC Metadata Terms.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  5. Abreu, A.: "Every bit informs another" : framework analysis for descriptive practice and linked information (2008) 0.05 
    0.048099514 = product of:
  0.09619903 = sum of:
    0.09619903 = product of:
      0.19239806 = sum of:
        0.19239806 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19239806 = score(doc=2249,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.64573616 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    The independent traditions of description in bibliographic and archival environments are rich and continually evolving. Recognizing this, how can Libraries, Archives and Museums seek convergence in describing materials on the web? In order to seek better description for materials and cross-institutional alignment, we can first reconceptualize where description may fit into work practices. I examine subject cataloging and archival practice alongside social tagging as a means of drawing conclusions for possible new paths in integration.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  6. Feinberg, M.: Expressive bibliography : personal collections in public space (2011) 0.05 
    0.048099514 = product of:
  0.09619903 = sum of:
    0.09619903 = product of:
      0.19239806 = sum of:
        0.19239806 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19239806 = score(doc=4561,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.64573616 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This paper examines collections of citations that individual users contribute to social tagging systems such as Delicious and LibraryThing. I characterize these personal collections, furnished with various forms of metadata and arranged for Web display, as a means of communication, where a particular sensibility molds guiding principles for resource selection, description, and categorization. Using several analytic frameworks from museum studies, I present three brief case studies that interrogate both the substance and the means of expression achieved in such collections, which I term "expressive bibliographies." In considering these case studies, I explore how an explicit rhetorical perspective might inform purposeful design of expressive bibliography.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  7. Blumauer, A.; Hochmeister, M.: Tag-Recommender gestützte Annotation von Web-Dokumenten (2009) 0.05 
    0.048099514 = product of:
  0.09619903 = sum of:
    0.09619903 = product of:
      0.19239806 = sum of:
        0.19239806 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19239806 = score(doc=4866,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.64573616 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In diesem Kapitel wird die zentrale Bedeutung der Annotation von Webdokumenten bzw. von Ressourcen in einem Semantischen Web diskutiert. Es wird auf aktuelle Methoden und Techniken in diesem Gebiet eingegangen, insbesondere wird das Phänomen "Social Tagging" als zentrales Element eines "Social Semantic Webs" beleuchtet. Weiters wird der Frage nachgegangen, welchen Mehrwert "Tag Recommender" beim Annotationsvorgang bieten, sowohl aus Sicht des End-Users aber auch im Sinne eines kollaborativen Ontologieerstellungsprozesses. Schließlich wird ein Funktionsprinzip für einen semi-automatischen Tag-Recommender vorgestellt unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Anwendbarkeit in einem Corporate Semantic Web.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  8. Peters, I.; Schumann, L.; Terliesner, J.: Folksonomy-basiertes Information Retrieval unter der Lupe (2012) 0.05 
    0.048099514 = product of:
  0.09619903 = sum of:
    0.09619903 = product of:
      0.19239806 = sum of:
        0.19239806 = weight(_text_:tagging in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19239806 = score(doc=406,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.64573616 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Social Tagging ist eine weitverbreitete Methode, um nutzergenerierte Inhalte in Webdiensten zu indexieren. Dieser Artikel fasst die aktuelle Forschung zu Folksonomies und Effektivität von Tags in Retrievalsystemen zusammen. Es wurde ein TREC-ähnlicher Retrievaltest mit Tags und Ressourcen aus dem Social Bookmarking-Dienst delicious durchgeführt, welcher in Recall- und Precisionwerten für ausschließlich Tag-basierte Suchen resultierte. Außerdem wurden Tags in verschiedenen Stufen bereinigt und auf ihre Retrieval-Effektivität getestet. Testergebnisse zeigen, dass Retrieval in Folksonomies am besten mit kurzen Anfragen funktioniert. Hierbei sind die Recallwerte hoch, die Precisionwerte jedoch eher niedrig. Die Suchfunktion "power tags only" liefert verbesserte Precisionwerte.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  9. Toutanova, K.; Klein, D.; Manning, C.D.; Singer, Y.: Feature-rich Part-of-Speech Tagging with a cyclic dependency network (2003) 0.05 
    0.048099514 = product of:
  0.09619903 = sum of:
    0.09619903 = product of:
      0.19239806 = sum of:
        0.19239806 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19239806 = score(doc=1059,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.64573616 = fieldWeight in 1059, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1059)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    We present a new part-of-speech tagger that demonstrates the following ideas: (i) explicit use of both preceding and following tag contexts via a dependency network representation, (ii) broad use of lexical features, including jointly conditioning on multiple consecutive words, (iii) effective use of priors in conditional loglinear models, and (iv) fine-grained modeling of unknown word features. Using these ideas together, the resulting tagger gives a 97.24%accuracy on the Penn TreebankWSJ, an error reduction of 4.4% on the best previous single automatically learned tagging result.
  10. Fox, M.J.; Reece, A.: ¬The impossible decision : social tagging and Derrida's deconstructed hospitality (2013) 0.05 
    0.048099514 = product of:
  0.09619903 = sum of:
    0.09619903 = product of:
      0.19239806 = sum of:
        0.19239806 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1067) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19239806 = score(doc=1067,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.64573616 = fieldWeight in 1067, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1067)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Social tagging
  11. Stuart, E.: Flickr: organizing and tagging images online (2019) 0.05 
    0.048099514 = product of:
  0.09619903 = sum of:
    0.09619903 = product of:
      0.19239806 = sum of:
        0.19239806 = weight(_text_:tagging in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19239806 = score(doc=5233,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.64573616 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Theme
    Social tagging
  12. #2434 0.05 
    0.047863185 = product of:
  0.09572637 = sum of:
    0.09572637 = product of:
      0.19145274 = sum of:
        0.19145274 = weight(_text_:22 in 2433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19145274 = score(doc=2433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2433)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 9.2011 12:28:22
  13. #2819 0.05 
    0.047863185 = product of:
  0.09572637 = sum of:
    0.09572637 = product of:
      0.19145274 = sum of:
        0.19145274 = weight(_text_:22 in 2818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19145274 = score(doc=2818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 2818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=2818)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  14. #4316 0.05 
    0.047863185 = product of:
  0.09572637 = sum of:
    0.09572637 = product of:
      0.19145274 = sum of:
        0.19145274 = weight(_text_:22 in 4315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19145274 = score(doc=4315,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 4315, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=4315)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  15. #7401 0.05 
    0.047863185 = product of:
  0.09572637 = sum of:
    0.09572637 = product of:
      0.19145274 = sum of:
        0.19145274 = weight(_text_:22 in 7400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19145274 = score(doc=7400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            1.0833232 = fieldWeight in 7400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.21875 = fieldNorm(doc=7400)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 5.1998 19:49:25
  16. Price, L.; Robinson, L.: Tag analysis as a tool for investigating information behaviour : comparing fan-tagging on Tumblr, Archive of Our Own and Etsy (2021) 0.05 
    0.047606166 = product of:
  0.09521233 = sum of:
    0.09521233 = product of:
      0.19042467 = sum of:
        0.19042467 = weight(_text_:tagging in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19042467 = score(doc=339,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.639113 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Purpose This article describes the third part of a three-stage study investigating the information behaviour of fans and fan communities, the first stage of which is described in the study by Price and Robinson (2017). Design/methodology/approach Using tag analysis as a method, a comparative case study was undertaken to explore three aspects of fan information behaviour: information gatekeeping; classifying and tagging and entrepreneurship and economic activity. The case studies took place on three sites used by fans-Tumblr, Archive of Our Own (AO3) and Etsy. Supplementary semi-structured interviews with site users were used to augment the findings with qualitative data. Findings These showed that fans used tags in a variety of ways quite apart from classification purposes. These included tags being used on Tumblr as meta-commentary and a means of dialogue between users, as well as expressors of emotion and affect towards posts. On AO3 in particular, fans had developed a practice called "tag wrangling" to mitigate the inherent "messiness" of tagging. Evidence was also found of a "hybrid market economy" on Etsy fan stores. From the study findings, a taxonomy of fan-related tags was developed. Research limitations/implications Findings are limited to the tagging practices on only three sites used by fans during Spring 2016, and further research on other similar sites are recommended. Longitudinal studies of these sites would be beneficial in understanding how or whether tagging practices change over time. Testing of the fan-tag taxonomy developed in this paper is also recommended. Originality/value This research develops a method for using tag analysis to describe information behaviour. It also develops a fan-tag taxonomy, which may be used in future research on the tagging practices of fans, which heretofore have been a little-studied section of serious leisure information users.
  17. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.05 
    0.046757184 = product of:
  0.09351437 = sum of:
    0.09351437 = product of:
      0.2805431 = sum of:
        0.2805431 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2805431 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4278608 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  18. Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019) 0.05 
    0.046757184 = product of:
  0.09351437 = sum of:
    0.09351437 = product of:
      0.2805431 = sum of:
        0.2805431 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2805431 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4278608 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05046712 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
  19. Wissenschaftskommunikation der Zukunft (WissKom 2007) : 4. Konferenz der Zentralbibliothek Forschungszentrum Jülich : 6. - 8. November 2007 ; Beiträge und Poster / [WissKom 2007]. Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Zentralbibliothek. Rafael Ball (Hrsg.). [Mit einem Festvortrag von Ernst Pöppel] (2007) 0.05 
    0.046444073 = product of:
  0.09288815 = sum of:
    0.09288815 = sum of:
      0.06871359 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06871359 = score(doc=4064,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046712 = queryNorm
          0.23062006 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
      0.024174558 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024174558 = score(doc=4064,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046712 = queryNorm
          0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Ernst Pöppel: Wissen - und wie es kommuniziert werden kann. - Anne-Katharina Weilenmann: Von Cyberscience zu e-Science. - Katrin Weller, Indra Mainz, Ingo Paulsen, Dominic Mainz: Semantisches und vernetztes Wissensmanagement für Forschung und Wissenschaft. - Ute Rusnak, Matthias Razum, Leni Helmes: Wissensvernetzung im Forschungsprozess. - Elena Semenova, Martin Stricker: Eine Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen. Entwicklung eines Instrumentariums für die Wissenskommunikation. - Peter Haber, Jan Hodel: Historische Fachkommunikation im Wandel. Analysen und Trends. - Lydia Bauer, Nadja Böller, Josef Herget, Sonja Hierl: Konzepte zur Förderung der Wissenschaftskommunikation: Der Churer Ansatz zur Vermittlung von kollaborativen Kompetenzen. - Susanne von liter: Wissenschaftskommunikation in der Entwicklungsforschung/Entwicklungszusammenarbeit Web2.0 und Communities of Practice - ein Beitrag aus der Praxis. - Steffen Leich-Nienhaus: Wissenschaftliche Informationsversorgung am modernen digitalen Arbeitsplatz. - Christian Hänger, Christine Krätzsch: Collaborative Tagging als neuer Service von Hochschulbibliotheken. - Christoph Bläsi: Mobile IT in kleinen und mittleren Medienunternehmen zur Prozess- und Serviceverbesserung. - Michael Diepenbroek, Hannes Grobe: PANGAEA® als vernetztes Verlags- und Bibliothekssystem für wissenschaftliche Daten. - Jan Brase, Jens Klump: Zitierfähige Datensätze: Primärdaten-Management durch DOls. - Harald Krottmaier: Die Systemarchitektur von PROBADO: Der allgemeine Zugriff auf Repositorien mit nicht-textuellen Inhalten. - Annette Holtkamp: Open Access Publishing in der Hochenergiephysik: Das SCOAP3 Projekt. - Wiebke Oeltjen: Metadaten-Management mit MyCoRe. - Karin Weishaupt: Open-Access-Zeitschriften als neue Form wissenschaftlicher Kommunikation: Vorbehalte und Vorschläge für Maßnahmen zur Akzeptanzsteigerung. - Wolfgang Glänzel, Koenraad Debackere: Bibliometrie zwischen Forschung und Dienstleistung. - Patrick Vanouplines, Ronald Beullens: Merging information sources to obtain the impact factor of open access journals. - Dirk Tunger: Bibliometrie als Teil eines Trenderkennungs-Systems in der Naturwissenschaft. - Milos Jovanovic: Indicators for Footprints through science - Designing the Journal Application Level (JAL). - James Pringle: The ISl Web of Knowledge as a Management Tool. - Show-Ling Lee-Müller, Gerd Schumacher: Einsatz bibliometrischer Analysen im EU-Projekt zur Technologiefrüherkennung SMART. - Henning Möller: Messen, Steuern, Regeln - zum Controlling der Helmhoitz-Forschung
    Date
    20. 1.2018 20:22:16
    Footnote
    Dennoch enthält der Band viele Beiträge, die für jene, die auf dem Feld der Wissenschaftskommunikation tätig sind, als fruchtbare Denkvorlage oder brauchbares praktisches Beispiel nützlich sind. Kommunikation in »Communities« Im Teil eScience (wobei das »e« für »enhanced« gleich »erweitert, verbessert« steht) werden in mehreren Beiträgen Projekte und Programme vorgestellt, welche die Bildung von und Kommunikation in »Communities« unterstützen und die kontrolliertes Vokabular (sogenannte »Ontologien«) für die Erschließung der unterschiedlichsten Medien bieten. Im Teil zur wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation hat dem Rezensenten besonders der Beitrag zu wandelnden Anforderungen von Historikern an einen virtuellen Arbeitsplatz und eine sich wandelnde Fachkommunikation gefallen, der darauf folgende Artikel aus Chur, der ein integriertes Modell von Maßnahmen zur Informations-, Medien- und Methodenkompetenz vorschlägt, ist für jeden hilfreich, die/der InformationskompetenzVeranstaltungen plant und durchführt. Bei den Praxisbeispielen zu Web 2.0 gefielen sowohl die Schilderung der Kommunikation innerhalb verschiedener Institutionen der Entwicklungsforschung, was die Bedeutung von RSS als Technik der kollektiven Information hervorhob, als auch der eher auf die Informationsversorgung abgestellte Bericht aus einem Unternehmen. Aber auch der Artikel zum »Collaborative Tagging» als einem neuen Dienst von Hochschulbibliotheken gibt Anhaltspunkte, dass das Verschlagworten nicht nur den Online-Foren vorbehalten bleibt, sondern zunehmend systematisch in den Hochschulen eingeführt wird. Beim Teil zum Primärdatenmanagement behandeln mehrere Beiträge die Praxis von Repositorien und der Erschließung der dort gelagerten Mediendateien, ebenso wird in zwei Beiträgen näher auf Open Access eingegangen, unter anderem auf die Nachweismittel von Open Access Journals wie zum Beispiel das »Directory of Open Access Journals« (DOAJ, www.doaj.org).
    Die letzten beiden Teile des Kongressbandes behandeln die Möglichkeiten der Bibliometrie zum Handling des sich explosionsartig vermehrenden Wissens sowie der Einsatz solcher Technologien als Trenderkennungssystem. Zuletzt behandelt ein Artikel die Evaluation der Helmholtz-Einrichtungen. Am Schluss befindet sich noch ein sechsseitiges Register, das sehr hilfreich und für einen Kongressband keineswegs selbstverständlich ist. Vielleicht sollte noch auf den als Einleitung abgedruckten, überaus lesenswerten Festvortrag von Ernst Pöppel, Professor für medizinische Psychologie aus München, hingewiesen werden, der die verschiedenen Formen des Wissens allgemeinverständlich aus Sicht der Hirnforschung darstellt. Hervorzuheben ist noch, dass die Publikation kostenlos über den Publikationsserver des FZ Jülich bezogen werden kann, eine Tatsache, die sich offensichtlich nicht herumgesprochen hat, da bei einer Suche über den Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalog (Stand: 22. April 2008) dieses »Exemplar« nicht gefunden wurde. Als höchstes der Gefühle bietet der Südwestverbund bei »elektronische Referenz« einen Link auf das Inhaltsverzeichnis. Vielleicht erbarmt sich pro Verbund jemand und nimmt die elektronische Version auf."
  20. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.05 
    0.045977287 = product of:
  0.091954574 = sum of:
    0.091954574 = sum of:
      0.06802298 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06802298 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2979515 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046712 = queryNorm
          0.2283022 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.023931593 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023931593 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17672725 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05046712 = queryNorm
          0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 3275
  • m 379
  • el 187
  • s 154
  • x 40
  • b 39
  • i 23
  • r 18
  • ? 8
  • p 4
  • d 3
  • n 3
  • u 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications