-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: What do we know about the h index? (2007)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.D.: What do citation counts measure? : a review of studies on citing behavior (2008)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 1729, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1729)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.; Daniel, H.D.: Do we need the h index and its variants in addition to standard bibliometric measures? (2009)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Universality of citation distributions : a validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator cf = c/c0 at the micro level using data from chemistry (2009)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Schier, H.; Marx, W.; Daniel, H.-D.: Is interactive open access publishing able to identify high-impact submissions? : a study on the predictive validity of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics by using percentile rank classes (2011)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Leydesdorff, L.: Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? : a new mapping approach, using Google Maps, based on statistical significance testing (2011)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 4767, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4767)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Integrated impact indicators compared with impact factors : an alternative research design with policy implications (2011)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Zhou, P.; Bornmann, L.: How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? : An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts (2013)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.: How to analyze percentile citation impact data meaningfully in bibliometrics : the statistical analysis of distributions, percentile rank classes, and top-cited papers (2013)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 656, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=656)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.: Lässt sich die Qualität von Forschung messen? (2013)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 928, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=928)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Radicchi, F.; Bornmann, L.; Castellano, C.; Nooy, W. de: Field-normalized impact factors (IFs) : a comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs (2013)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Mutz, R.: Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings? (2013)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 1109, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1109)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.: On the function of university rankings (2014)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Marx, W.: Distributions instead of single numbers : percentiles and beam plots for the assessment of single researchers (2014)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 1190, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1190)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.: Is there currently a scientific revolution in Scientometrics? (2014)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 1206, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1206)
- Theme
- Informetrie
-
Bornmann, L.; Moya Anegón, F.de: What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? : Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking (2014)
4.45
4.4476724 = weight(theme_ss:Informetrie in 1235) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
4.4476724 = fieldWeight in 1235, product of:
1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
4.4476724 = idf(docFreq=1406, maxDocs=44218)
1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=1235)
- Theme
- Informetrie
