Diese Datenbank enthält über 40.000 Dokumente zu Themen aus den Bereichen Formalerschließung – Inhaltserschließung – Information Retrieval.
© 2015 W. Gödert, TH Köln, Institut für Informationswissenschaft / Powered by litecat, BIS Oldenburg (Stand: 03. März 2020)
1Kuhagen, J.: RDA content in multiple languages : a new standard not only for libraries.
In: Jlis.it. 7(2016) no.2, S.299-306.
Abstract: A summary of the presence of RDA content in languages other than English in RDA Toolkit, in the RDA Registry, in the RIMMF data editor, and as separate translations is given. Translation policy is explained and the benefits of translation on the content of RDA are noted.
Inhalt: Vgl. unter: http://leo.cineca.it/index.php/jlis/article/view/11705.
Anmerkung: Beitrag in einem Themenheft zu RDA.
Objekt: RDA ; RIMMF
2Belpassi, E.: ¬The application software RIMMF : RDA thinking in action.
In: Jlis.it. 7(2016) no.1, S.207-223.
Abstract: RIMMF software is grew out of the need to visualize and realize records according to the RDA guidelines. The article describes the software structure and features in the creation of a rball, that is a small database populated by recordings of bibliographic and authority resources enriched by relationships between and among entities involved. At first it's introduced the need that led to RIMMF outcome, then starts the software functional analysis. With a description of the main steps of the r-ball building, emphasizing the issues raised. The results highlights some critical aspects, but above all the wide scope of possible developments that open the Cultural Heritage Institutions horizon to the web prospective. Conclusions display the RDF-linkeddata development of the RIMMF incoming future.
Inhalt: Vgl. unter: http://leo.cineca.it/index.php/jlis/article/view/11495.
Objekt: RDA ; RIMMF
3Guerrini, M. ; Possemato, T.: From record management to data management : RDA and new application models BIBFRAME, RIMMF, and OliSuite/WeCat.
In: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.3, S.179-199.
Abstract: The reflection provoked by RDA produced the awareness that the flat format of MARC 21 records is inadequate in expressing the relationships between bibliographic entities that the FRBR model and RDA standard consider fundamental. RIMMF and BIBFRAME indicate to software developers a way to think that is consistent with RDA. In Italy, @Cult, a software house and bibliographic agency working for Casalini Libri, has taken on the charge of following and facilitating the transition: OliSuite/WeCat provides an implementation of RDA that integrates vocabularies and ontologies already present in the Web by structuring the information in linked open data.
Inhalt: Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2016.1144667.
Objekt: RDA ; BIBFRAME ; RIMMF ; OliSuite/WeCat