Document (#22622)

Author
Mao, C.-C.
Title
¬The compatibility of CMARC
Source
Journal of educational media and library sciences. 35(1998) no.4, S.310-337
Year
1998
Abstract
Chinese MARC (CMARC) adopts the UNIMARC approach rather than the USMARC tradition. The 4th edition of CMARC was published in 1997 and completely abandons the Linking Entry Block feature in favour of USMARC features. Concludes that CMARC has lost its compatibility with UNIMARC and this may cause chaos in the near future
Footnote
In Chinesisch
Theme
Datenformate
Object
CMARC
Location
China

Similar documents (content)

  1. Davis, S.P.: Format integration : handling serials and mixed media (1990) 0.16
    0.15826748 = sum of:
      0.15826748 = product of:
        0.7913374 = sum of:
          0.04628628 = weight(abstract_txt:rather in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04628628 = score(doc=3543,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.09663099 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.3117391 = boost
                5.1093373 = idf(docFreq=725, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.4790004 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                5.1093373 = idf(docFreq=725, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
          0.05122837 = weight(abstract_txt:concludes in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05122837 = score(doc=3543,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.10339239 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.3568553 = boost
                5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.49547523 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                5.285069 = idf(docFreq=608, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
          0.07130133 = weight(abstract_txt:feature in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07130133 = score(doc=3543,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.12888825 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5149417 = boost
                5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.55320275 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                5.9008293 = idf(docFreq=328, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
          0.118845776 = weight(abstract_txt:cause in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.118845776 = score(doc=3543,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.18119133 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7962134 = boost
                6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.6559132 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                6.996407 = idf(docFreq=109, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
          0.50367564 = weight(abstract_txt:usmarc in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.50367564 = score(doc=3543,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.37662187 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.662326 = boost
                7.132539 = idf(docFreq=95, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              1.3373511 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                7.132539 = idf(docFreq=95, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
        0.2 = coord(5/25)
    
  2. MacCallum, S.H.: Harmonization of USMARC, CANMARC, and UKMARC (2000) 0.12
    0.12273184 = sum of:
      0.12273184 = product of:
        0.6136592 = sum of:
          0.01367158 = weight(abstract_txt:than in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.01367158 = score(doc=185,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.05615928 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8950868 = idf(docFreq=2444, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.24344292 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                3.8950868 = idf(docFreq=2444, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
          0.03085752 = weight(abstract_txt:rather in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03085752 = score(doc=185,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.09663099 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.3117391 = boost
                5.1093373 = idf(docFreq=725, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.31933358 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                5.1093373 = idf(docFreq=725, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
          0.10889433 = weight(abstract_txt:marc in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10889433 = score(doc=185,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.11199087 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.4121491 = boost
                5.500443 = idf(docFreq=490, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.9723501 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                5.500443 = idf(docFreq=490, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
          0.048986327 = weight(abstract_txt:1997 in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048986327 = score(doc=185,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.13149998 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5302136 = boost
                5.9603148 = idf(docFreq=309, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.37251967 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                5.9603148 = idf(docFreq=309, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
          0.41124946 = weight(abstract_txt:usmarc in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.41124946 = score(doc=185,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.37662187 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.662326 = boost
                7.132539 = idf(docFreq=95, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              1.0919425 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                7.132539 = idf(docFreq=95, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
        0.2 = coord(5/25)
    
  3. McKercher, B.; Chang, P.X.: ¬A comparison of USMARC and UNIMARC for system design (1995) 0.12
    0.12055883 = sum of:
      0.12055883 = product of:
        0.7534927 = sum of:
          0.057749946 = weight(abstract_txt:marc in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057749946 = score(doc=2627,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.11199087 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.4121491 = boost
                5.500443 = idf(docFreq=490, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.51566654 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                5.500443 = idf(docFreq=490, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
          0.07842283 = weight(abstract_txt:linking in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07842283 = score(doc=2627,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.13733353 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5637867 = boost
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.5710392 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                6.091085 = idf(docFreq=271, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
          0.35615247 = weight(abstract_txt:usmarc in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.35615247 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.37662187 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.662326 = boost
                7.132539 = idf(docFreq=95, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.94565 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.132539 = idf(docFreq=95, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
          0.26116744 = weight(abstract_txt:unimarc in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.26116744 = score(doc=2627,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.38586694 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7070038 = boost
                7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.67683285 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
        0.16 = coord(4/25)
    
  4. Merwe, H.C.J. van der: SAMARC versus USMARC and UNIMARC : a position paper (1997) 0.10
    0.10359508 = sum of:
      0.10359508 = product of:
        0.86329234 = sum of:
          0.057749946 = weight(abstract_txt:marc in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.057749946 = score(doc=890,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.11199087 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.4121491 = boost
                5.500443 = idf(docFreq=490, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.51566654 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                5.500443 = idf(docFreq=490, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
          0.43619588 = weight(abstract_txt:usmarc in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.43619588 = score(doc=890,freq=3.0), product of:
              0.37662187 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.662326 = boost
                7.132539 = idf(docFreq=95, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              1.1581799 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                  3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                7.132539 = idf(docFreq=95, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
          0.36934653 = weight(abstract_txt:unimarc in 890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.36934653 = score(doc=890,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.38586694 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7070038 = boost
                7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.9571862 = fieldWeight in 890, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=890)
        0.12 = coord(3/25)
    
  5. Matsubayashi, M.: ¬The German cataloging rules (RAK) : an introduction and annotated bibliography (1996) 0.09
    0.09246495 = sum of:
      0.09246495 = product of:
        0.57790595 = sum of:
          0.04376403 = weight(abstract_txt:future in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04376403 = score(doc=497,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.066668175 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.0895534 = boost
                4.243905 = idf(docFreq=1724, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.65644556 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.243905 = idf(docFreq=1724, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
          0.0889417 = weight(abstract_txt:edition in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0889417 = score(doc=497,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.13476817 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.5491123 = boost
                6.033927 = idf(docFreq=287, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.65996075 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                6.033927 = idf(docFreq=287, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
          0.13758488 = weight(abstract_txt:near in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13758488 = score(doc=497,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.18025923 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.7915874 = boost
                6.9783883 = idf(docFreq=111, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.7632612 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                6.9783883 = idf(docFreq=111, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
          0.30761534 = weight(abstract_txt:compatibility in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.30761534 = score(doc=497,freq=1.0), product of:
              0.38832828 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.718808 = boost
                7.24254 = idf(docFreq=85, maxDocs=44218)
                0.014417979 = queryNorm
              0.7921528 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
                1.0 = tf(freq=1.0), with freq of:
                  1.0 = termFreq=1.0
                7.24254 = idf(docFreq=85, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
        0.16 = coord(4/25)