Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Abramo, G."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.; Costa, F. Di: Identifying interdisciplinarity through the disciplinary classification of coauthors of scientific publications (2012) 0.02 
    0.015128995 = product of:
  0.03025799 = sum of:
    0.03025799 = product of:
      0.06051598 = sum of:
        0.06051598 = weight(_text_:2004 in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06051598 = score(doc=491,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.27880776 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The growing complexity of challenges involved in scientific progress demands ever more frequent application of competencies and knowledge from different scientific fields. The present work analyzes the degree of collaboration among scientists from different disciplines to identify the most frequent "combinations of knowledge" in research activity. The methodology adopts an innovative bibliometric approach based on the disciplinary affiliation of publication coauthors. The field of observation includes all publications (167,179) indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded for the years 2004-2008, authored by all scientists in the hard sciences (43,223) at Italian universities (68). The analysis examines 205 research fields grouped in 9 disciplines. Identifying the fields with the highest potential of interdisciplinary collaboration is useful to inform research polices at the national and regional levels, as well as management strategies at the institutional level.
  2. Abramo, G.; D'Angelo, C.A.: ¬The VQR, Italy's second national research assessment : methodological failures and ranking distortions (2015) 0.02 
    0.015128995 = product of:
  0.03025799 = sum of:
    0.03025799 = product of:
      0.06051598 = sum of:
        0.06051598 = weight(_text_:2004 in 2256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06051598 = score(doc=2256,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.27880776 = fieldWeight in 2256, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2256)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The 2004-2010 VQR (Research Quality Evaluation), completed in July 2013, was Italy's second national research assessment exercise. The VQR performance evaluation followed a pattern also seen in other nations, as it was based on a selected subset of products. In this work, we identify the exercise's methodological weaknesses and measure the distortions that result from them in the university performance rankings. First, we create a scenario in which we assume the efficient selection of the products to be submitted by the universities and, from this, simulate a set of rankings applying the precise VQR rating criteria. Next, we compare these "VQR rankings" with those that would derive from the application of more-appropriate bibliometrics. Finally, we extend the comparison to university rankings based on the entire scientific production for the period, as indexed in the Web of Science.
  3. D'Angelo, C.A.; Giuffrida, C.; Abramo, G.: ¬A heuristic approach to author name disambiguation in bibliometrics databases for large-scale research assessments (2011) 0.01 
    0.0104882475 = product of:
  0.020976495 = sum of:
    0.020976495 = product of:
      0.04195299 = sum of:
        0.04195299 = weight(_text_:22 in 4190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04195299 = score(doc=4190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:06:52

Authors

Themes