Adam, M.; Musiat, J.; Stöhr, M.; Wenzel, C.: Literaturverwaltungsprogramme im Überblick (2016)
0.03
0.02621891 = product of:
0.15075873 = sum of:
0.06940037 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06940037 = score(doc=3298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13761917 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.024120767 = queryNorm
0.5042929 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
0.029622005 = weight(_text_:und in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029622005 = score(doc=3298,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05346047 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.024120767 = queryNorm
0.55409175 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
0.017036173 = weight(_text_:im in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017036173 = score(doc=3298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06818425 = queryWeight, product of:
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.024120767 = queryNorm
0.24985497 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
0.034700185 = product of:
0.06940037 = sum of:
0.06940037 = weight(_text_:allgemeines in 3298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06940037 = score(doc=3298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13761917 = queryWeight, product of:
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.024120767 = queryNorm
0.5042929 = fieldWeight in 3298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.705423 = idf(docFreq=399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3298)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.17391305 = coord(4/23)
- Abstract
- Das Dokument enthält einen Vergleich von sechs Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen - Zotero, Citavi, Mendeley, RefWorks, EndNote und JabRef. Es wurden Versionen mit Stand 11/2016 getestet. Folgende Kriterien wurden berücksichtigt: Allgemeines und Installation, Import- / Exportmöglichkeiten, Dateneingabe und -bearbeitung, Anzeige und Suche, Kooperation, Zitieren und Literaturlisten, weitere Funktionen und Benutzung. Der Vergleich schließt mit einer Gesamtbewertung der Stärken und Schwächen und gibt zielgruppenspezifische Auswahlempfehlungen.
