Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeinen%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierungs im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahmen%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierungs %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierung im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
-
Tudhope, D.; Alani, H.; Jones, C.: Augmenting thesaurus relationships : possibilities for retrieval (2001)
0.00
0.001039214 = product of: 0.01195096 = sum of: 0.0063955644 = weight(_text_:und in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0063955644 = score(doc=1520,freq=2.0), product of: 0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of: 2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218) 0.023567878 = queryNorm 0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218) 0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520) 0.0055553955 = product of: 0.011110791 = sum of: 0.011110791 = weight(_text_:1 in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.011110791 = score(doc=1520,freq=4.0), product of: 0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of: 2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218) 0.023567878 = queryNorm 0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218) 0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/181. Vgl. auch: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/viewArticle/181/160. Vgl. auch: http://oro.open.ac.uk/20065/1/Tudhope_JoDI.pdf.
- Source
- Journal of digital information. 1(2001) no.8
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
-
Saif, H.; He, Y.; Fernandez, M.; Alani, H.: Contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of Twitter (2016)
0.00
2.4153895E-4 = product of: 0.0055553955 = sum of: 0.0055553955 = product of: 0.011110791 = sum of: 0.011110791 = weight(_text_:1 in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.011110791 = score(doc=2667,freq=4.0), product of: 0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of: 2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218) 0.023567878 = queryNorm 0.19191428 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218) 0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2667) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- Sentiment analysis on Twitter has attracted much attention recently due to its wide applications in both, commercial and public sectors. In this paper we present SentiCircles, a lexicon-based approach for sentiment analysis on Twitter. Different from typical lexicon-based approaches, which offer a fixed and static prior sentiment polarities of words regardless of their context, SentiCircles takes into account the co-occurrence patterns of words in different contexts in tweets to capture their semantics and update their pre-assigned strength and polarity in sentiment lexicons accordingly. Our approach allows for the detection of sentiment at both entity-level and tweet-level. We evaluate our proposed approach on three Twitter datasets using three different sentiment lexicons to derive word prior sentiments. Results show that our approach significantly outperforms the baselines in accuracy and F-measure for entity-level subjectivity (neutral vs. polar) and polarity (positive vs. negative) detections. For tweet-level sentiment detection, our approach performs better than the state-of-the-art SentiStrength by 4-5% in accuracy in two datasets, but falls marginally behind by 1% in F-measure in the third dataset.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 52(2016) no.1, S.5-19
Authors
- Fernandez, M. 1
- He, Y. 1
- Jones, C. 1
- Saif, H. 1
- Tudhope, D. 1