Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Armstrong, C.J."
  1. Armstrong, C.J.; Medawar, K.: Investigation into the quality of databases in general use in the UK (1996) 0.04
    0.03621646 = product of:
      0.07243292 = sum of:
        0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03790077 = score(doc=6768,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
        0.034532152 = product of:
          0.069064304 = sum of:
            0.069064304 = weight(_text_:project in 6768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069064304 = score(doc=6768,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21156175 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050121464 = queryNorm
                0.32644984 = fieldWeight in 6768, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.220981 = idf(docFreq=1764, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6768)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) BLRRD funded project which investigated the quality of databases in general use in the UK. Gives a literature review of quality in library and information services. Reports the results of a CIQM questionnaire survey on the quality problems of databases and their affect on users. Carries out databases evaluations of: INSPEC on ESA-IRS, INSPEC on KR Data-Star, INSPEC on UMI CD-ROM, BNB on CD-ROM, and Information Science Abstracts Plus CD-ROM. Sets out a methodology for evaluation of bibliographic databases
    Imprint
    London : British Library
  2. Armstrong, C.J.; Keen, E.M.: Workbook for NEPHIS and KWAC : Microcomputer printed subject indexes teaching package, Pt.1 (1982) 0.02
    0.018950384 = product of:
      0.07580154 = sum of:
        0.07580154 = weight(_text_:library in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07580154 = score(doc=439,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.57517654 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    London : British Library
    Series
    British Library research and development report; 5710
  3. Armstrong, C.J.; Keen, E.M.: Manual for teaching NEPHIS and KWAC : Microcomputer printed subject indexes teaching package, Pt.2 (1982) 0.02
    0.018950384 = product of:
      0.07580154 = sum of:
        0.07580154 = weight(_text_:library in 440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07580154 = score(doc=440,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.57517654 = fieldWeight in 440, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=440)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    London : British Library
    Series
    British Library research and development report: 5711
  4. Armstrong, C.J.: Database information quality (1995) 0.01
    0.00957139 = product of:
      0.03828556 = sum of:
        0.03828556 = weight(_text_:library in 3383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03828556 = score(doc=3383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.29050803 = fieldWeight in 3383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3383)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Library and information briefings. 1995, no.62, S.1-14
  5. Armstrong, C.J.: ¬The quality of publicly available databases : WYSIWYG of what? (1996) 0.01
    0.009475192 = product of:
      0.03790077 = sum of:
        0.03790077 = weight(_text_:library in 7264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03790077 = score(doc=7264,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.28758827 = fieldWeight in 7264, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7264)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the issue of quality as applied to databases. Describes the role of the Centre for Information Quality Management (CIQM) set up by the Library Association and the UK Online User Group (UKOLUG), in acting as a clearing house to which database users could report problems relating to the quality of any aspect of a database being used. The Centre compiles statistics on database quality issues which can then be forwarded to the database producers and hosts. Champions the use of standardized database labels which include not only basic information about the database but also a quality assurance statement
    Imprint
    Bournemouth : University Library and Information Services
  6. Armstrong, C.J.: Database labelling : CIQM proposes changes (1995) 0.01
    0.0076571116 = product of:
      0.030628446 = sum of:
        0.030628446 = weight(_text_:library in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030628446 = score(doc=3384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.23240642 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a meeting held on 4 May 95 with the Library Association and members of the information industry which was organised to report on the work of the Centre for Information Quality Management, UK, on a database labelling methodology for assuring database quality to users. Describes database labelling, reports on a survey of database user satisfaction and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of database labelling
  7. Armstrong, C.J.; Wheatley, A.: Writing abstracts for online databases : results of database producers' guidelines (1998) 0.01
    0.006699973 = product of:
      0.026799891 = sum of:
        0.026799891 = weight(_text_:library in 3295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026799891 = score(doc=3295,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1317883 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050121464 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 3295, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3295)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on one area of research in an Electronic Libraries Programme (eLib) MODELS (MOving to Distributed Environments for Library Services) supporting study in 3 investigative areas: examination of current database producers' guidelines for their abstract writers; a brief survey of abstracts in some traditional online databases; and a detailed survey of abstracts from 3 types of electronic database (print sourced online databases, Internet subject trees or directories, and Internet gateways). Examination of database producers' guidelines, reported here, gave a clear view of the intentions behind professionally produced traditional (printed index based) database abstracts and provided a benchmark against which to judge the conclusions of the larger investigations into abstract style, readability and content