-
Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.; Leide, J.E.: Tensions in cataloging : observations on standards and implementation (1998)
0.09
0.08947014 = product of:
0.17894028 = sum of:
0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 1034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024031956 = score(doc=1034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1034)
0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 1034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15490833 = score(doc=1034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 1034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1034)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Journal of information ethics. 17(2008) no.1, S.28-42
-
Arsenault, C.; Leide, J.E.: Format integration and the design of cataloging and classification curricula (2002)
0.07
0.0734481 = product of:
0.0979308 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 5456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=5456,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5456, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5456)
0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 5456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066389285 = score(doc=5456,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 5456, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5456)
0.021242103 = product of:
0.042484205 = sum of:
0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 5456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042484205 = score(doc=5456,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 5456, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5456)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Cataloging is a dynamic and ever changing activity. Developments in codes and standards create a need for continuing reconsideration of the design of our curricula. Format integration, in particular, raises questions about the structure of curricula for cataloging and classification. The issues relating to differing formats of materials are not new, but the process of standardization of treatment, which was begun quite tentatively in the development of the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (AACR) has blossomed to the fore in the ensuing years. This paper examines the historical context of the integration of formats before addressing the continuing arguments that maintain that all types of materials should be treated in an introductory course as opposed to those that assert that format issues should not be covered in any depth in an introductory course. A design for an integrated, but not exhaustive, treatment of formats in an introductory course with more detailed coverage included in advanced courses is proposed.
- Footnote
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum; Part I
-
Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Arsenault, C.: Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization : from one conference to another: Toronto 2000, Lille 2011 (2012)
0.03
0.031032179 = product of:
0.062064357 = sum of:
0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014565565 = score(doc=321,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 321, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=321)
0.047498792 = product of:
0.094997585 = sum of:
0.094997585 = weight(_text_:organization in 321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.094997585 = score(doc=321,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.5284991 = fieldWeight in 321, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=321)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Since its creation in 1996, the French chapter of ISKO has been concerned with knowledge organization issues. This topic has been dealt with from different angles: knowledge organization structures, tools for mediation, forms and mechanisms for knowledge sharing. Given that these issues are at the center of information production and access as well as knowledge dissemination, the 8 th edition of the ISKO-France conference aimed to focus specifically on the subject of stability and dynamism in the concepts and paradigms underlying knowledge organization research. Eleven years after the sixth International ISKO Conference organized by the Faculty of Information Studies at the University of Toronto on this very theme, the French ISKO chapter, convinced of the importance of this theme, proposed to revisit it.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.4, S.255-258
-
Arsenault, C.: Testing the impact of syllable aggregation in romanized fields of Chinese language bibliographic records (2000)
0.02
0.01680845 = product of:
0.0336169 = sum of:
0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008582841 = score(doc=87,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
0.025034059 = product of:
0.050068118 = sum of:
0.050068118 = weight(_text_:organization in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050068118 = score(doc=87,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.27854347 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Today, two Romanization systems for Chinese data are in use in most libraries in the Western world: 1) Wade-Giles, and 2) Hanyu pinyin (simply referred to as pinyin). In 1997, the Library of Congress finally officially announced the adoption of pinyin for Romanizing Chinese data in its bibliographic records. One of the main problems in implementing the pinyin standard for library use is that pinyin, as opposed to Wade-Giles, aggregates Chinese "words" into single linguistic units. Chinese characters represent monosyllabic morphemes rather than words and are equally spaced from one another, and the Chinese text, in its original form, does not provide visual cues as to where a word starts or ends. When the script is romanized it is however essential that syllables or words be separated from one another, since, in most information retrieval techniques, the identification of "visual words" is required. In this respect, the Romanized strings could be divided either in monosyllables or in polysyllable words. This study aims to explore the impact of using either unaggregated pinyin (monosyllabic) or aggregated pinyin (polysyllabic) Romanization in Chinese-language bibliographic records. An experiment, using transaction log analysis, was carried out to observe variations in the retrieval performance of title searches-both phrase and keyword-in a large OPAC of Chinese language records. General results are presented and a summary of the pros and cons of using either method is given
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.7
- Source
- Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
-
Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007)
0.01
0.0051229675 = product of:
0.02049187 = sum of:
0.02049187 = product of:
0.04098374 = sum of:
0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04098374 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
