-
Ashman, H.; Verbyla, J.: Externalising hypermedia structures with the functional model of the link (1993)
0.01
0.008627858 = product of:
0.021569645 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 7116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=7116,freq=2.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 7116, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7116)
0.013396261 = product of:
0.026792523 = sum of:
0.026792523 = weight(_text_:information in 7116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026792523 = score(doc=7116,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 7116, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7116)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Imprint
- Oxford : Learned Information
- Source
- Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al
- Type
- a
-
Ashman, H.; Garrido, A.; Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Hand-made and computed links, precomputed and dynamic links (1997)
0.01
0.008412599 = product of:
0.021031497 = sum of:
0.01155891 = weight(_text_:a in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01155891 = score(doc=736,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
0.009472587 = product of:
0.018945174 = sum of:
0.018945174 = weight(_text_:information in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018945174 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Hypertext - Information Retrieval - Multimedia '97: Theorien, Modelle und Implementierungen integrierter elektronischer Informationssysteme. Proceedings HIM '97. Hrsg.: N. Fuhr u.a
- Type
- a
-
Truran, M.; Schmakeit, J.-F.; Ashman, H.: ¬The effect of user intent on the stability of search engine results (2011)
0.01
0.0060245167 = product of:
0.015061291 = sum of:
0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 4478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009535614 = score(doc=4478,freq=8.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4478, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4478)
0.005525676 = product of:
0.011051352 = sum of:
0.011051352 = weight(_text_:information in 4478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011051352 = score(doc=4478,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4478, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4478)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Previous work has established that search engine queries can be classified according to the intent of the searcher (i.e., why is the user searching, what specifically do they intend to do). In this article, we describe an experiment in which four sets of queries, each set representing a different user intent, are repeatedly submitted to three search engines over a period of 60 days. Using a variety of measurements, we describe the overall stability of the search engine results recorded for each group. Our findings suggest that search engine results for informational queries are significantly more stable than the results obtained using transactional, navigational, or commercial queries.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1276-1287
- Type
- a
-
Smith, G.; Brien, C.; Ashman, H.: Evaluating implicit judgments from image search clickthrough data (2012)
0.01
0.0050555216 = product of:
0.012638804 = sum of:
0.008173384 = weight(_text_:a in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008173384 = score(doc=518,freq=18.0), product of:
0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
0.0044654203 = product of:
0.0089308405 = sum of:
0.0089308405 = weight(_text_:information in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0089308405 = score(doc=518,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046368346 = queryNorm
0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The interactions of users with search engines can be seen as implicit relevance feedback by the user on the results offered to them. In particular, the selection of results by users can be interpreted as a confirmation of the relevance of those results, and used to reorder or prioritize subsequent search results. This collection of search/result pairings is called clickthrough data, and many uses for it have been proposed. However, the reliability of clickthrough data has been challenged and it has been suggested that clickthrough data are not a completely accurate measure of relevance between search term and results. This paper reports on an experiment evaluating the reliability of clickthrough data as a measure of the mutual relevance of search term and result. The experiment comprised a user study involving over 67 participants and determines the reliability of image search clickthrough data, using factors identified in previous similar studies. A major difference in this work to previous work is that the source of clickthrough data comes from image searches, rather than the traditional text page searches. Image search clickthrough data were rarely examined in prior works but has differences that impact the accuracy of clickthrough data. These differences include a more complete representation of the results in image search, allowing users to scrutinize the results more closely before selecting them, as well as presenting the results in a less obviously ordered way. The experiment reported here demonstrates that image clickthrough data can be more reliable as a relevance feedback measure than has been the case with traditional text-based search. There is also evidence that the precision of the search system influences the accuracy of click data when users make searches in an information-seeking capacity.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.12, S.2451-2462
- Type
- a
