Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Assem, M. van"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Assem, M. van; Rijgersberg, H.; Wigham, M.; Top, J.: Converting and annotating quantitative data tables (2010) 0.01
    0.0050526154 = product of:
      0.04547354 = sum of:
        0.04547354 = weight(_text_:data in 4705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04547354 = score(doc=4705,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.39059696 = fieldWeight in 4705, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4705)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Companies, governmental agencies and scientists produce a large amount of quantitative (research) data, consisting of measurements ranging from e.g. the surface temperatures of an ocean to the viscosity of a sample of mayonnaise. Such measurements are stored in tables in e.g. spreadsheet files and research reports. To integrate and reuse such data, it is necessary to have a semantic description of the data. However, the notation used is often ambiguous, making automatic interpretation and conversion to RDF or other suitable format diffiult. For example, the table header cell "f(Hz)" refers to frequency measured in Hertz, but the symbol "f" can also refer to the unit farad or the quantities force or luminous flux. Current annotation tools for this task either work on less ambiguous data or perform a more limited task. We introduce new disambiguation strategies based on an ontology, which allows to improve performance on "sloppy" datasets not yet targeted by existing systems.
  2. Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004) 0.00
    0.0027115175 = product of:
      0.024403658 = sum of:
        0.024403658 = weight(_text_:data in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024403658 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11642061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036818076 = queryNorm
            0.2096163 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies will play a central role in the development of the Semantic Web. It is unrealistic to assume that such ontologies will be developed from scratch. Rather, we assume that existing resources such as thesauri and lexical data bases will be reused in the development of ontologies for the Semantic Web. In this paper we describe a method for converting existing source material to a representation that is compatible with Semantic Web languages such as RDF(S) and OWL. The method is illustrated with three case studies: converting Wordnet, AAT and MeSH to RDF(S) and OWL.