Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bade, D."
  1. Bade, D.: ¬The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs : language and subject knowledge in a technological era (2002) 0.00
    0.0024714202 = product of:
      0.012357101 = sum of:
        0.012357101 = product of:
          0.018535651 = sum of:
            0.009309699 = weight(_text_:29 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009309699 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11976871 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03404757 = queryNorm
                0.07773064 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
            0.0092259515 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0092259515 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11922879 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03404757 = queryNorm
                0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Footnote
    Arguing that catalogers need to work both quickly and accurately, Bade maintains that employing specialists is the most efficient and effective way to achieve this outcome. Far less compelling than these arguments are Bade's concluding remarks, in which he offers meager suggestions for correcting the problems as he sees them. Overall, this essay is little more than a curmudgeon's diatribe. Addressed primarily to catalogers and library administrators, the analysis presented is too superficial to assist practicing catalogers or cataloging managers in developing solutions to any systemic problems in current cataloging practice, and it presents too little evidence of pervasive problems to convince budget-conscious library administrators of a need to alter practice or to increase their investment in local cataloging operations. Indeed, the reliance upon anecdotal evidence and the apparent nit-picking that dominate the essay might tend to reinforce a negative image of catalogers in the minds of some. To his credit, Bade does provide an important reminder that it is the intellectual contributions made by thousands of erudite catalogers that have made shared cataloging a successful strategy for improving cataloging efficiency. This is an important point that often seems to be forgotten in academic libraries when focus centers an cutting costs. Had Bade focused more narrowly upon the issue of deintellectualization of cataloging and written a carefully structured essay to advance this argument, this essay might have been much more effective." - KO 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.236-237 (A. Sauperl)
  2. Bade, D.: Rapid cataloging : three models for addressing timeliness as an issue of quality in library catalogs (2007) 0.00
    0.0021851677 = product of:
      0.010925839 = sum of:
        0.010925839 = product of:
          0.032777514 = sum of:
            0.032777514 = weight(_text_:w in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032777514 = score(doc=778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12974867 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03404757 = queryNorm
                0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper analyses the presuppositions, goals, and implementations of policies for rapid cataloging in three large academic libraries in the United States. In the first model, The University of Chicago's W-Collection, there was no attempt to catalog materials; the order record alone is used and the items are shelved in a publicly accessible area by accession number. The second model, Princeton's ATA Procedure, made cataloging the initial activity upon receipt, the purpose of which was "to give the future librarians enough information to know if the item is already in the collection or not" and also to serve (with subject headings and classification) the library's users. Finally, Cornell's COR Procedure in which all information in the records is assumed to be temporary and therefore unimportant; the necessary information is expected to be acquired later from commercial sources.
  3. Bade, D.: Jakobsonian library science? A response to Jonathan Tuttle's article "The aphasia of modern subject access". (2013) 0.00
    0.002172263 = product of:
      0.010861315 = sum of:
        0.010861315 = product of:
          0.032583944 = sum of:
            0.032583944 = weight(_text_:29 in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032583944 = score(doc=1949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11976871 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03404757 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 16:00:58