Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014) 0.03

0.028118761 = product of:
  0.09841566 = sum of:
    0.082511574 = weight(_text_:i in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.082511574 = score(doc=1296,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.65227187 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
    0.015904086 = product of:
      0.03180817 = sum of:
        0.03180817 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03180817 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11744665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033538654 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract: I analyze the text of an article that appeared in this journal in 2007 that published the results of a questionnaire in which a number of experts were asked to define the concepts of data, information, and knowledge. I apply standard information retrieval techniques to build a list of the most frequent terms in each set of definitions. I then apply information extraction techniques to analyze how the top terms are used in the definitions. As a result, I draw data-driven conclusions about the aggregate opinion of the experts. I contrast this with the original analysis of the data to provide readers with an alternative viewpoint on what the data tell us.
Date: 16. 6.2014 19:22:57

Badia, A.: ¬The information manifold : why computers cannot solve algorithmic bias and fake news (2019) 0.00
```
0.003012269 = product of:
  0.021085883 = sum of:
    0.021085883 = weight(_text_:i in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021085883 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12649874 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.033538654 = queryNorm
        0.16668847 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
```
Content

Introduction -- Information as codes : Shannon, Kolmogorov and the start of it all -- Information as content : semantics, possible worlds and all that jazz -- Information as pragmatics : impact and consequences -- Information as communication : networks and the phenomenon of emergence -- Will the real information please stand up? -- Is Shannon's theory a theory of information? -- Computers and information I : what can computers do? -- Computers and information II : machine learning, big data and algorithic bias -- Humans and information --Conclusions : where from here?

Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Types

Subjects

Classifications