Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Badia, A."
  1. Badia, A.: Data, information, knowledge : an information science analysis (2014) 0.02
    0.01634611 = product of:
      0.06538444 = sum of:
        0.05131233 = weight(_text_:data in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05131233 = score(doc=1296,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.5468357 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
        0.014072108 = product of:
          0.028144216 = sum of:
            0.028144216 = weight(_text_:22 in 1296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028144216 = score(doc=1296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103918076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029675366 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    I analyze the text of an article that appeared in this journal in 2007 that published the results of a questionnaire in which a number of experts were asked to define the concepts of data, information, and knowledge. I apply standard information retrieval techniques to build a list of the most frequent terms in each set of definitions. I then apply information extraction techniques to analyze how the top terms are used in the definitions. As a result, I draw data-driven conclusions about the aggregate opinion of the experts. I contrast this with the original analysis of the data to provide readers with an alternative viewpoint on what the data tell us.
    Date
    16. 6.2014 19:22:57
  2. Badia, A.: ¬The information manifold : why computers cannot solve algorithmic bias and fake news (2019) 0.00
    0.0016391122 = product of:
      0.013112898 = sum of:
        0.013112898 = weight(_text_:data in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013112898 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029675366 = queryNorm
            0.1397442 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    Introduction -- Information as codes : Shannon, Kolmogorov and the start of it all -- Information as content : semantics, possible worlds and all that jazz -- Information as pragmatics : impact and consequences -- Information as communication : networks and the phenomenon of emergence -- Will the real information please stand up? -- Is Shannon's theory a theory of information? -- Computers and information I : what can computers do? -- Computers and information II : machine learning, big data and algorithic bias -- Humans and information --Conclusions : where from here?