Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bainbridge, D."
  • × theme_ss:"Information Gateway"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Bainbridge, D.; Dewsnip, M.; Witten, l.H.: Searching digital music libraries (2005) 0.00
    0.0017568587 = product of:
      0.009662722 = sum of:
        0.0072322977 = weight(_text_:a in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0072322977 = score(doc=997,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    There has been a recent explosion of interest in digital music libraries. In particular, interactive melody retrieval is a striking example of a search paradigm that differs radically from the standard full-text search. Many different techniques have been proposed for melody matching, but the area lacks standard databases that allow them to be compared on common grounds--and copyright issues have stymied attempts to develop such a corpus. This paper focuses on methods for evaluating different symbolic music matching strategies, and describes a series of experiments that compare and contrast results obtained using three dominant paradigms. Combining two of these paradigms yields a hybrid approach which is shown to have the best overall combination of efficiency and effectiveness.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.1, S.41-56
    Type
    a