Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Balakrishnan, V."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Rajagopal, P.; Ravana, S.D.; Koh, Y.S.; Balakrishnan, V.: Evaluating the effectiveness of information retrieval systems using effort-based relevance judgment (2019) 0.02 
    0.021423629 = product of:
  0.064270884 = sum of:
    0.055643205 = weight(_text_:propose in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055643205 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.2836406 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
    0.008627683 = product of:
      0.025883049 = sum of:
        0.025883049 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025883049 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Purpose The effort in addition to relevance is a major factor for satisfaction and utility of the document to the actual user. The purpose of this paper is to propose a method in generating relevance judgments that incorporate effort without human judges' involvement. Then the study determines the variation in system rankings due to low effort relevance judgment in evaluating retrieval systems at different depth of evaluation. Design/methodology/approach Effort-based relevance judgments are generated using a proposed boxplot approach for simple document features, HTML features and readability features. The boxplot approach is a simple yet repeatable approach in classifying documents' effort while ensuring outlier scores do not skew the grading of the entire set of documents. Findings The retrieval systems evaluation using low effort relevance judgments has a stronger influence on shallow depth of evaluation compared to deeper depth. It is proved that difference in the system rankings is due to low effort documents and not the number of relevant documents. Originality/value Hence, it is crucial to evaluate retrieval systems at shallow depth using low effort relevance judgments.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  2. Ravana, S.D.; Rajagopal, P.; Balakrishnan, V.: Ranking retrieval systems using pseudo relevance judgments (2015) 0.00 
    0.0020335645 = product of:
  0.0122013865 = sum of:
    0.0122013865 = product of:
      0.03660416 = sum of:
        0.03660416 = weight(_text_:22 in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03660416 = score(doc=2591,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    18. 9.2018 18:22:56
  3. Balakrishnan, V.; Ahmadi, K.; Ravana, S.D.: Improving retrieval relevance using users' explicit feedback (2016) 0.00 
    0.0014379472 = product of:
  0.008627683 = sum of:
    0.008627683 = product of:
      0.025883049 = sum of:
        0.025883049 = weight(_text_:22 in 2921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025883049 = score(doc=2921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2921)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Authors

Themes