Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bar-Ilan, J."
  1. Bar-Ilan, J.: Information hub blogs (2005) 0.07
    0.07457832 = product of:
      0.14915664 = sum of:
        0.14915664 = product of:
          0.44746992 = sum of:
            0.44746992 = weight(_text_:blogs in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.44746992 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3654632 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052765302 = queryNorm
                1.2243912 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Shema, H.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Thelwall, M.: How is research blogged? : A content analysis approach (2015) 0.04
    0.04036671 = product of:
      0.08073342 = sum of:
        0.08073342 = product of:
          0.24220024 = sum of:
            0.24220024 = weight(_text_:blogs in 1863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24220024 = score(doc=1863,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.3654632 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052765302 = queryNorm
                0.6627213 = fieldWeight in 1863, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1863)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Blogs that cite academic articles have emerged as a potential source of alternative impact metrics for the visibility of the blogged articles. Nevertheless, to evaluate more fully the value of blog citations, it is necessary to investigate whether research blogs focus on particular types of articles or give new perspectives on scientific discourse. Therefore, we studied the characteristics of peer-reviewed references in blogs and the typical content of blog posts to gain insight into bloggers' motivations. The sample consisted of 391 blog posts from 2010 to 2012 in Researchblogging.org's health category. The bloggers mostly cited recent research articles or reviews from top multidisciplinary and general medical journals. Using content analysis methods, we created a general classification scheme for blog post content with 10 major topic categories, each with several subcategories. The results suggest that health research bloggers rarely self-cite and that the vast majority of their blog posts (90%) include a general discussion of the issue covered in the article, with more than one quarter providing health-related advice based on the article(s) covered. These factors suggest a genuine attempt to engage with a wider, nonacademic audience. Nevertheless, almost 30% of the posts included some criticism of the issues being discussed.
  3. Shema, H.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Thelwall, M.: Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? : Research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics (2014) 0.04
    0.03955113 = product of:
      0.07910226 = sum of:
        0.07910226 = product of:
          0.23730677 = sum of:
            0.23730677 = weight(_text_:blogs in 1258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23730677 = score(doc=1258,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.3654632 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052765302 = queryNorm
                0.6493315 = fieldWeight in 1258, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1258)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Journal-based citations are an important source of data for impact indices. However, the impact of journal articles extends beyond formal scholarly discourse. Measuring online scholarly impact calls for new indices, complementary to the older ones. This article examines a possible alternative metric source, blog posts aggregated at ResearchBlogging.org, which discuss peer-reviewed articles and provide full bibliographic references. Articles reviewed in these blogs therefore receive "blog citations." We hypothesized that articles receiving blog citations close to their publication time receive more journal citations later than the articles in the same journal published in the same year that did not receive such blog citations. Statistically significant evidence for articles published in 2009 and 2010 support this hypothesis for seven of 12 journals (58%) in 2009 and 13 of 19 journals (68%) in 2010. We suggest, based on these results, that blog citations can be used as an alternative metric source.
  4. Bar-Ilan, J.: Web links and search engine ranking : the case of Google and the query "Jew" (2006) 0.02
    0.023305725 = product of:
      0.04661145 = sum of:
        0.04661145 = product of:
          0.13983434 = sum of:
            0.13983434 = weight(_text_:blogs in 6104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13983434 = score(doc=6104,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3654632 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052765302 = queryNorm
                0.38262224 = fieldWeight in 6104, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6104)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web has become one of our more important information sources, and commercial search engines are the major tools for locating information; however, it is not enough for a Web page to be indexed by the search engines-it also must rank high on relevant queries. One of the parameters involved in ranking is the number and quality of links pointing to the page, based on the assumption that links convey appreciation for a page. This article presents the results of a content analysis of the links to two top pages retrieved by Google for the query "jew" as of July 2004: the "jew" entry on the free online encyclopedia Wikipedia, and the home page of "Jew Watch," a highly anti-Semitic site. The top results for the query "jew" gained public attention in April 2004, when it was noticed that the "Jew Watch" homepage ranked number 1. From this point on, both sides engaged in "Googlebombing" (i.e., increasing the number of links pointing to these pages). The results of the study show that most of the links to these pages come from blogs and discussion links, and the number of links pointing to these pages in appreciation of their content is extremely small. These findings have implications for ranking algorithms based on link counts, and emphasize the huge difference between Web links and citations in the scientific community.
  5. Bronstein, J.; Gazit, T.; Perez, O.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Aharony, N.; Amichai-Hamburger, Y.: ¬An examination of the factors contributing to participation in online social platforms (2016) 0.01
    0.008936212 = product of:
      0.017872425 = sum of:
        0.017872425 = product of:
          0.03574485 = sum of:
            0.03574485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03574485 = score(doc=3364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052765302 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.: Towards maximal unification of semantically diverse ontologies for controversial domains (2014) 0.01
    0.00714897 = product of:
      0.01429794 = sum of:
        0.01429794 = product of:
          0.02859588 = sum of:
            0.02859588 = weight(_text_:22 in 1634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02859588 = score(doc=1634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052765302 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1634)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  7. Zhitomirsky-Geffet, M.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Levene, M.: Testing the stability of "wisdom of crowds" judgments of search results over time and their similarity with the search engine rankings (2016) 0.01
    0.00714897 = product of:
      0.01429794 = sum of:
        0.01429794 = product of:
          0.02859588 = sum of:
            0.02859588 = weight(_text_:22 in 3071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02859588 = score(doc=3071,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1847751 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052765302 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3071, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22