Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Barnes, C.S."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Barnes, C.S.: ¬The construct validity of the h-index (2016) 0.00
    0.0040019182 = product of:
      0.02000959 = sum of:
        0.02000959 = product of:
          0.04001918 = sum of:
            0.04001918 = weight(_text_:h in 3165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04001918 = score(doc=3165,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.10309036 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041494254 = queryNorm
                0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 3165, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3165)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this paper is to show how bibliometrics would benefit from a stronger programme of construct validity. Design/methodology/approach The value of the construct validity concept is demonstrated by applying this approach to the evaluation of the h-index, a widely used metric. Findings The paper demonstrates that the h-index comprehensively fails any test of construct validity. In simple terms, the metric does not measure what it purports to measure. This conclusion suggests that the current popularity of the h-index as a topic for bibliometric research represents wasted effort, which might have been avoided if researchers had adopted the approach suggested in this paper. Research limitations/implications This study is based on the analysis of a single bibliometric concept. Practical implications The conclusion that the h-index fails any test in terms of construct validity implies that the widespread use of this metric within the higher education sector as a management tool represents poor practice, and almost certainly results in the misallocation of resources. Social implications This paper suggests that the current enthusiasm for the h-index within the higher education sector is misplaced. The implication is that universities, grant funding bodies and faculty administrators should abandon the use of the h-index as a management tool. Such a change would have a significant effect on current hiring, promotion and tenure practices within the sector, as well as current attitudes towards the measurement of academic performance. Originality/value The originality of the paper lies in the systematic application of the concept of construct validity to bibliometric enquiry.
    Object
    h-index