Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Barry, C.I."
  • × author_ss:"Schamber, L."
  • × theme_ss:"Retrievalstudien"
  1. Barry, C.I.; Schamber, L.: User-defined relevance criteria : a comparison of 2 studies (1995) 0.00
    0.00270615 = product of:
      0.0054123 = sum of:
        0.0054123 = product of:
          0.0108246 = sum of:
            0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0108246 = score(doc=3850,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046056706 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Aims to determine the extent to which there is a core of relevance criteria that soans such factors as information need situations, user environments, and types of information. 2 recent empirical studies have identified and described user defined relevance criteria. Synthesizes the findings of the 2 studies as a 1st step toward identifying criteria that seem to span information environments and criteria that may be more situationally specific
    Type
    a