Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.017923556 = product of:
  0.08961778 = sum of:
    0.08961778 = product of:
      0.17923556 = sum of:
        0.17923556 = weight(_text_:index in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17923556 = score(doc=2350,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.94608164 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

I discuss how, given a certain number of articles and citations of these articles, the h-index and the g-index are affected by the level of concentration of the citations. This offers the opportunity for a comparison between these 2 indices from a new perspective.

Object

g-index
h-index

0.015522254 = product of:
  0.07761127 = sum of:
    0.07761127 = product of:
      0.15522254 = sum of:
        0.15522254 = weight(_text_:index in 454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15522254 = score(doc=454,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18945041 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04335484 = queryNorm
            0.8193307 = fieldWeight in 454, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=454)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Object

h-index