Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bartolucci, F."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Bartolucci, F.: ¬A comparison between the g-index and the h-index based on concentration (2015) 0.04
    0.042591367 = product of:
      0.21295683 = sum of:
        0.21295683 = weight(_text_:index in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21295683 = score(doc=2350,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.94608164 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    I discuss how, given a certain number of articles and citations of these articles, the h-index and the g-index are affected by the level of concentration of the citations. This offers the opportunity for a comparison between these 2 indices from a new perspective.
    Object
    g-index
    h-index
  2. Bartolucci, F.: On a possible decomposition of the h-index. (2012) 0.04
    0.036885202 = product of:
      0.18442601 = sum of:
        0.18442601 = weight(_text_:index in 454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18442601 = score(doc=454,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2250935 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051511593 = queryNorm
            0.8193307 = fieldWeight in 454, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=454)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Object
    h-index