Bates, M.E.: Finding the question behind the question (1998)
0.03
0.028787265 = product of:
0.05757453 = sum of:
0.05757453 = sum of:
0.007654148 = weight(_text_:a in 3048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007654148 = score(doc=3048,freq=4.0), product of:
0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3048, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3048)
0.04992038 = weight(_text_:22 in 3048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04992038 = score(doc=3048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046056706 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the art of the reference interview, suggesting that although it may be possible that the ability to conduct a good reference interview can only be learned through experience, there are some useful pointers that can help librarians hone their skills and identify possible problem areas: these are discussed. Points out that time invested in the primary reference interview is time that does not have to be spent later on when it turns out the client really wanted something different
- Date
- 22. 2.1999 19:19:54
- Type
- a
