Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bates, M.J."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989) 0.00 
    0.002730383 = product of:
  0.024573447 = sum of:
    0.024573447 = weight(_text_:of in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024573447 = score(doc=2883,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
    Source
    Online '88. Proceedings of the Online Inc., Conference, New York, 11-12 October 1988
  2. Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989) 0.00 
    0.0026033178 = product of:
  0.023429861 = sum of:
    0.023429861 = weight(_text_:of in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023429861 = score(doc=207,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
  3. Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986) 0.00 
    0.0016464829 = product of:
  0.014818345 = sum of:
    0.014818345 = weight(_text_:of in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014818345 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.061262865 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03917671 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.357-367