-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
0.0045800544 = product of:
0.013740162 = sum of:
0.013740162 = product of:
0.027480325 = sum of:
0.027480325 = weight(_text_:of in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027480325 = score(doc=2883,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
- Source
- Online '88. Proceedings of the Online Inc., Conference, New York, 11-12 October 1988
-
Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989)
0.00
0.00436691 = product of:
0.01310073 = sum of:
0.01310073 = product of:
0.02620146 = sum of:
0.02620146 = weight(_text_:of in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02620146 = score(doc=207,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
-
Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986)
0.00
0.0027618767 = product of:
0.00828563 = sum of:
0.00828563 = product of:
0.01657126 = sum of:
0.01657126 = weight(_text_:of in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01657126 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06850986 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043811057 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.357-367