Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bates, M.J."
  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Bates, M.J.: Subject access in online catalogs: a design model (1986) 0.02
    0.01707061 = product of:
      0.09104325 = sum of:
        0.031633206 = product of:
          0.06326641 = sum of:
            0.06326641 = weight(_text_:online in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06326641 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.6638847 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0149678625 = weight(_text_:information in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0149678625 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055122808 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
        0.044442184 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044442184 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
      0.1875 = coord(3/16)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986), S.357-367
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  2. Bates, M.J.: Rethinking subject cataloging in the online environment (1989) 0.01
    0.010867912 = product of:
      0.0869433 = sum of:
        0.036152236 = product of:
          0.07230447 = sum of:
            0.07230447 = weight(_text_:online in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07230447 = score(doc=119,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.75872535 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.050791066 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050791066 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  3. Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989) 0.01
    0.006724178 = product of:
      0.053793423 = sum of:
        0.022368053 = product of:
          0.044736106 = sum of:
            0.044736106 = weight(_text_:online in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044736106 = score(doc=2883,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.031425368 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031425368 = score(doc=2883,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
    Source
    Online '88. Proceedings of the Online Inc., Conference, New York, 11-12 October 1988
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  4. Bates, M.J.: How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching (1989) 0.01
    0.006349584 = product of:
      0.050796673 = sum of:
        0.019371305 = product of:
          0.03874261 = sum of:
            0.03874261 = weight(_text_:online in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03874261 = score(doc=207,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.09529729 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031400457 = queryNorm
                0.4065447 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.031425368 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031425368 = score(doc=207,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09498371 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031400457 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 207, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=207)
      0.125 = coord(2/16)
    
    Abstract
    Optimal retrieval in on-line searching can be achieved through combined use of both natural language and controlled vocabularies. However, there is a large variety of types of controlled vocabulary in data bases and often more than one in a single data base. Optimal use of these vocabularies requires understanding what types of languages are involved, and taking advantage of the particular mix of vocabularies in a given data base. Examples 4 major types of indexing and classification used in data bases and puts these 4 in the context of 3 other approaches to subject access. Discusses how to evaluate a new data base for various forms of subject access.
    Source
    Online. 11(1988), S.45-56
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval