Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bates, M.J."
  • × type_ss:"el"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Bates, M.J.: ¬The nature of browsing (2019) 0.00
    0.00424829 = product of:
      0.01699316 = sum of:
        0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 2265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01699316 = score(doc=2265,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2265, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2265)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The recent article by McKay et al. on browsing (2019) provides a valuable addition to the empirical literature of information science on this topic, and I read the descriptions of the various browsing cases with interest. However, the authors refer to my article on browsing (Bates, 2007) in ways that do not make sense to me and which do not at all conform to what I actually said.
    Content
    Bezug (Letter to the editor) zu: McKay, D., Chang, S.,, Smith, W., Buchanan, G.: The things we talk about when we talk about browsing: an empirical typology of library browsing behavior. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2019).