Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
-
×
author_ss:"Batty, D."
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeinen %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f firmen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesign %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesigns %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
-
Batty, D.: ¬The future of DDC in the perspective of current classification research (1989)
0.00
3.531705E-4 = product of: 0.00706341 = sum of: 0.00706341 = weight(_text_:in in 2070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.00706341 = score(doc=2070,freq=8.0), product of: 0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.02879306 = queryNorm 0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2070, product of: 2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of: 8.0 = termFreq=8.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2070) 0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Abstract
- One by one, the noble characteristics that we have chosen in the past to set us apart from other species have fallen before the march of zoological research - othe species can laugh, grieve, use tools, communicate by sound alone, and analyze and respond to complex stimulis well as we. But one trait is ours. We are lisvmakers - eben when we do not use the lists we make. The development of classification has been long and full of false starts, reflective of contemporary intellectual persuasions; from a desire to classify the entire universe, to a conviction that classification is pointless beyond an extemely small universe of discourse. Yet we have achieved an impressive body of theory. We have expressed what Melvil Dewey and his contemporaries only felt. Should we ever use it in a practical way? The upward curve has not been smooth, but for most of those involved, it was and has been fun, and sometimes funny. Only by retaining a sense of perspective can we view the future.
- Source
- Classification theory in the computer age: conversations across the disciplines. Proc. from the Conf. 18.-19.11.1988, Albany, NY
-
Batty, D.: ¬An introduction to the twentieth edition of the Dewey Decimal Classification (1992)
0.00
2.35447E-4 = product of: 0.00470894 = sum of: 0.00470894 = weight(_text_:in in 7026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.00470894 = score(doc=7026,freq=2.0), product of: 0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.02879306 = queryNorm 0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 7026, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7026) 0.05 = coord(1/20)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 20(1993) no.4, S.232-233 (M.P. Satija)