Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Beall, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Beall, J.: Publishers' errors make catalogers [sic] : an analysis of the error indicators [sic] and [i.e.] in cataloging (2001) 0.02
    0.023724673 = product of:
      0.11071514 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
        0.056881975 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056881975 = score(doc=5426,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 5426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=5426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 5426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5426)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    In bibliographic records, catalogers use the error indicators [sic] or [i.e.] with a correction to indicate that a preexisting error was noted on the item being cataloged that did occur not during the cataloging process. This article analyzes this practice and provides examples of the recent use of the error indicators. The article also suggests how the use of the error indicators in bibliographic records might be improved and describes aspects of their use that merit further study.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 32(2001) no.3, S.87-108
  2. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: Measuring typographical errors' impact on retrieval in bibliographic databases (2007) 0.02
    0.01511595 = product of:
      0.0705411 = sum of:
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
        0.030166224 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030166224 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.2580748 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
        0.02018744 = weight(_text_:classification in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02018744 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 44(2007) nos.3/4, S.197-211
  3. Beall, J.: Describing the foreign language skills of catalogers in academic libraries (1991) 0.01
    0.013458293 = product of:
      0.09420805 = sum of:
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 3673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=3673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 3673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3673)
        0.047104023 = weight(_text_:classification in 3673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047104023 = score(doc=3673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.49260917 = fieldWeight in 3673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3673)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 14(1991) no.1, S.39-47
  4. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004) 0.01
    0.01208941 = product of:
      0.08462586 = sum of:
        0.070387855 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070387855 = score(doc=4849,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.6021745 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
        0.014238005 = product of:
          0.02847601 = sum of:
            0.02847601 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02847601 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10514317 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03002521 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Beall, J.: Cataloging World Wide Web sites consisting mainly of links (1997) 0.01
    0.011353812 = product of:
      0.079476684 = sum of:
        0.029704956 = weight(_text_:subject in 3408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029704956 = score(doc=3408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10738805 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 3408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3408)
        0.04977173 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04977173 = score(doc=3408,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11688946 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.4258017 = fieldWeight in 3408, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3408)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    WWW sites, consisting mainly of links to other Internet resources, have begun to proliferate and these sites are valuable to library users and researchers because they bring together in a single Web site links to a comprehensive array of information resources. Because libraries may elect to include bibliographic records for these sites in their online catalogues, cataloguers should be aware of some of the main aspects of cataloguing this new type of resource. Concludes that cataloguers should be aware of the main types and different characteristics of these Web sites, how to describe them in bibliographic records and how to assign appropriate subject headings for them
  6. Beall, J.: Abbreviations, full spellings, and searchers' preferences (2011) 0.01
    0.007690453 = product of:
      0.053833168 = sum of:
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 4166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=4166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 4166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4166)
        0.026916584 = weight(_text_:classification in 4166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026916584 = score(doc=4166,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09562149 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03002521 = queryNorm
            0.28149095 = fieldWeight in 4166, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4166)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 49(2011) no.6, S.443-456