Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Beall, J."
  1. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: Measuring typographical errors' impact on retrieval in bibliographic databases (2007) 0.05
    0.054726195 = product of:
      0.10945239 = sum of:
        0.10945239 = product of:
          0.21890478 = sum of:
            0.21890478 = weight(_text_:word in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21890478 = score(doc=261,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.7772181 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Typographical errors can block access to records in online catalogs; but, when a word contains a typo and is also spelled correctly elsewhere in the same record, access may not be blocked. To quantify the effect of typographical errors in records on information retrieval, we conducted a study to measure the proportion of records that contain a typographical error but that do not also contain a correct spelling of the same word. This article presents the experimental design, results of the study, and a statistical analysis of the results.We find that the average proportion of records that are blocked by the presence of a typo (that is, records in which a correct spelling of the word does not also occur) ranges from 35% to 99%, depending upon the frequency of the word being searched and the likelihood of the word being misspelled.
  2. Beall, J.: Abbreviations, full spellings, and searchers' preferences (2011) 0.05
    0.046149176 = product of:
      0.09229835 = sum of:
        0.09229835 = product of:
          0.1845967 = sum of:
            0.1845967 = weight(_text_:word in 4166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1845967 = score(doc=4166,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.6554078 = fieldWeight in 4166, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4166)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study examined ten, selected word pairs, each containing a word's full spelling and its abbreviation, to determine which form search engine users preferred in searching. Using seven search logs gathered from several Internet search engines with approximately 608 MB of data, the study measured the occurrences of the twenty terms. The selected words are important in library cataloging, for some are prescribed abbreviations in metadata content standards. The study found that in eight of the ten word pairs users preferred to search full spellings over the abbreviations, often by a high margin.'
  3. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Beall, J.: Using literary warrant to define a version of the DDC for automated classification services (2004) 0.01
    0.012736317 = product of:
      0.025472634 = sum of:
        0.025472634 = product of:
          0.050945267 = sum of:
            0.050945267 = weight(_text_:22 in 2645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050945267 = score(doc=2645,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2645, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2645)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    DDC-22
  4. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004) 0.01
    0.012736317 = product of:
      0.025472634 = sum of:
        0.025472634 = product of:
          0.050945267 = sum of:
            0.050945267 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050945267 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Beall, J.: Approaches to expansions : case studies from the German and Vietnamese translations (2003) 0.01
    0.009097369 = product of:
      0.018194739 = sum of:
        0.018194739 = product of:
          0.036389478 = sum of:
            0.036389478 = weight(_text_:22 in 1748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036389478 = score(doc=1748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Object
    DDC-22